Cargando…
Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
PURPOSE: Although breast density is considered a strong risk factor of breast cancer, its quantitative assessment is difficult. To investigate a quantitative method of measuring breast density using dual‐energy mammographic imaging with central digital breast tomosynthesis in physically uniform and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12618 |
_version_ | 1783425933089177600 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Kun‐Mu Yeh, Da‐Ming Cao, Bi‐Hui Lin, Chia‐Yi Liang, Chih‐Yu Zhou, Yu‐Bo Tsai, Chia‐Jung |
author_facet | Lu, Kun‐Mu Yeh, Da‐Ming Cao, Bi‐Hui Lin, Chia‐Yi Liang, Chih‐Yu Zhou, Yu‐Bo Tsai, Chia‐Jung |
author_sort | Lu, Kun‐Mu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although breast density is considered a strong risk factor of breast cancer, its quantitative assessment is difficult. To investigate a quantitative method of measuring breast density using dual‐energy mammographic imaging with central digital breast tomosynthesis in physically uniform and nonuniform phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dual‐energy imaging unit used a tungsten anode and silver filter with 30 kVp for high‐energy images and 20 kVp for low‐energy images. Uniform glandular‐equivalent phantoms were used to calibrate a dual‐energy based decomposition algorithm. The first study used uniform breast phantoms which ranged in thicknesses from 20 to 70 mm, in 10‐mm increments, and which provided 30%, 50%, and 70% of breast density. The second study used uniform phantoms ranging from 10% to 90% of breast density. The third study used non‐uniform phantoms (at an average density of 50%) with a thickness which ranged from 20 to 90 mm, in 10‐mm increments. RESULTS: The root mean square error of breast density measurements was 2.64–3.34% for the uniform, variable thickness phantoms, 4.17% for the uniform, variable density phantoms, and 4.49% for the nonuniform, variable thickness phantoms. CONCLUSION: The dual‐energy technique could be used to measure breast density with a margin of error of < 10% using digital breast tomosynthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65602442019-06-17 Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system Lu, Kun‐Mu Yeh, Da‐Ming Cao, Bi‐Hui Lin, Chia‐Yi Liang, Chih‐Yu Zhou, Yu‐Bo Tsai, Chia‐Jung J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: Although breast density is considered a strong risk factor of breast cancer, its quantitative assessment is difficult. To investigate a quantitative method of measuring breast density using dual‐energy mammographic imaging with central digital breast tomosynthesis in physically uniform and nonuniform phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dual‐energy imaging unit used a tungsten anode and silver filter with 30 kVp for high‐energy images and 20 kVp for low‐energy images. Uniform glandular‐equivalent phantoms were used to calibrate a dual‐energy based decomposition algorithm. The first study used uniform breast phantoms which ranged in thicknesses from 20 to 70 mm, in 10‐mm increments, and which provided 30%, 50%, and 70% of breast density. The second study used uniform phantoms ranging from 10% to 90% of breast density. The third study used non‐uniform phantoms (at an average density of 50%) with a thickness which ranged from 20 to 90 mm, in 10‐mm increments. RESULTS: The root mean square error of breast density measurements was 2.64–3.34% for the uniform, variable thickness phantoms, 4.17% for the uniform, variable density phantoms, and 4.49% for the nonuniform, variable thickness phantoms. CONCLUSION: The dual‐energy technique could be used to measure breast density with a margin of error of < 10% using digital breast tomosynthesis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6560244/ /pubmed/31106990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12618 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Lu, Kun‐Mu Yeh, Da‐Ming Cao, Bi‐Hui Lin, Chia‐Yi Liang, Chih‐Yu Zhou, Yu‐Bo Tsai, Chia‐Jung Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system |
title | Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system |
title_full | Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system |
title_fullStr | Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system |
title_short | Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system |
title_sort | quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukunmu quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem AT yehdaming quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem AT caobihui quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem AT linchiayi quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem AT liangchihyu quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem AT zhouyubo quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem AT tsaichiajung quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem |