Cargando…

Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system

PURPOSE: Although breast density is considered a strong risk factor of breast cancer, its quantitative assessment is difficult. To investigate a quantitative method of measuring breast density using dual‐energy mammographic imaging with central digital breast tomosynthesis in physically uniform and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Kun‐Mu, Yeh, Da‐Ming, Cao, Bi‐Hui, Lin, Chia‐Yi, Liang, Chih‐Yu, Zhou, Yu‐Bo, Tsai, Chia‐Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12618
_version_ 1783425933089177600
author Lu, Kun‐Mu
Yeh, Da‐Ming
Cao, Bi‐Hui
Lin, Chia‐Yi
Liang, Chih‐Yu
Zhou, Yu‐Bo
Tsai, Chia‐Jung
author_facet Lu, Kun‐Mu
Yeh, Da‐Ming
Cao, Bi‐Hui
Lin, Chia‐Yi
Liang, Chih‐Yu
Zhou, Yu‐Bo
Tsai, Chia‐Jung
author_sort Lu, Kun‐Mu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although breast density is considered a strong risk factor of breast cancer, its quantitative assessment is difficult. To investigate a quantitative method of measuring breast density using dual‐energy mammographic imaging with central digital breast tomosynthesis in physically uniform and nonuniform phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dual‐energy imaging unit used a tungsten anode and silver filter with 30 kVp for high‐energy images and 20 kVp for low‐energy images. Uniform glandular‐equivalent phantoms were used to calibrate a dual‐energy based decomposition algorithm. The first study used uniform breast phantoms which ranged in thicknesses from 20 to 70 mm, in 10‐mm increments, and which provided 30%, 50%, and 70% of breast density. The second study used uniform phantoms ranging from 10% to 90% of breast density. The third study used non‐uniform phantoms (at an average density of 50%) with a thickness which ranged from 20 to 90 mm, in 10‐mm increments. RESULTS: The root mean square error of breast density measurements was 2.64–3.34% for the uniform, variable thickness phantoms, 4.17% for the uniform, variable density phantoms, and 4.49% for the nonuniform, variable thickness phantoms. CONCLUSION: The dual‐energy technique could be used to measure breast density with a margin of error of < 10% using digital breast tomosynthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65602442019-06-17 Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system Lu, Kun‐Mu Yeh, Da‐Ming Cao, Bi‐Hui Lin, Chia‐Yi Liang, Chih‐Yu Zhou, Yu‐Bo Tsai, Chia‐Jung J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: Although breast density is considered a strong risk factor of breast cancer, its quantitative assessment is difficult. To investigate a quantitative method of measuring breast density using dual‐energy mammographic imaging with central digital breast tomosynthesis in physically uniform and nonuniform phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dual‐energy imaging unit used a tungsten anode and silver filter with 30 kVp for high‐energy images and 20 kVp for low‐energy images. Uniform glandular‐equivalent phantoms were used to calibrate a dual‐energy based decomposition algorithm. The first study used uniform breast phantoms which ranged in thicknesses from 20 to 70 mm, in 10‐mm increments, and which provided 30%, 50%, and 70% of breast density. The second study used uniform phantoms ranging from 10% to 90% of breast density. The third study used non‐uniform phantoms (at an average density of 50%) with a thickness which ranged from 20 to 90 mm, in 10‐mm increments. RESULTS: The root mean square error of breast density measurements was 2.64–3.34% for the uniform, variable thickness phantoms, 4.17% for the uniform, variable density phantoms, and 4.49% for the nonuniform, variable thickness phantoms. CONCLUSION: The dual‐energy technique could be used to measure breast density with a margin of error of < 10% using digital breast tomosynthesis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6560244/ /pubmed/31106990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12618 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Lu, Kun‐Mu
Yeh, Da‐Ming
Cao, Bi‐Hui
Lin, Chia‐Yi
Liang, Chih‐Yu
Zhou, Yu‐Bo
Tsai, Chia‐Jung
Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
title Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
title_full Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
title_short Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
title_sort quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual‐energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12618
work_keys_str_mv AT lukunmu quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem
AT yehdaming quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem
AT caobihui quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem
AT linchiayi quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem
AT liangchihyu quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem
AT zhouyubo quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem
AT tsaichiajung quantitativeevaluationofbreastdensityusingadualenergytechniqueonadigitalbreasttomosynthesissystem