Cargando…
Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs
BACKGROUND: Porcelain veneers are permanent restorations that combine good aesthetic with functionality by minimal destructive techniques. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the influence of the preparation designs on the fracture localisation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three preparation designs of po...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Republic of Macedonia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.323 |
_version_ | 1783425939136315392 |
---|---|
author | Zlatanovska, Katerina A. Dimova, Cena Gigovski, Nikola Korunoska-Stevkovska, Vesna Longurova, Natasa |
author_facet | Zlatanovska, Katerina A. Dimova, Cena Gigovski, Nikola Korunoska-Stevkovska, Vesna Longurova, Natasa |
author_sort | Zlatanovska, Katerina A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Porcelain veneers are permanent restorations that combine good aesthetic with functionality by minimal destructive techniques. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the influence of the preparation designs on the fracture localisation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three preparation designs of porcelain veneers fabricated by a method of laying on a fireproof abutment on maxillary central incisor were examined in this in vitro study-feather preparation, bevel preparation and incisal overlap – palatal chamfer. The samples from all three groups were loaded into a universal test machine-TRITECH WF 10056 until damage occurred on the porcelain veneer. Fracture localisation was classified as an incisal, gingival or combination. Data were analysed with statistical programs: STATISTICA 7.1; SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: In feather preparation, as a consequence of the mechanical force, the most common is the incisal localisation (66.7%), followed by the combined (33.3%), while the gingival fracture localisation is not registered. In bevel preparation, the most common fracture localisation is combined (53.6%), followed by incisal (35.7%) and subsequent gingival localisation (10.7%). In incisal overlap (palatal chamfer), combined and gingival localisation of the fracture is equally recorded in 14.3% of the samples, while the incisal is the most common localisation and is registered in 72.4%. CONCLUSION: During the study, a statistically significant dependence was found between the localisation of the occurred changes (incisal, gingival and combination) and the three different types of preparation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Republic of Macedonia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65602822019-06-17 Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs Zlatanovska, Katerina A. Dimova, Cena Gigovski, Nikola Korunoska-Stevkovska, Vesna Longurova, Natasa Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science BACKGROUND: Porcelain veneers are permanent restorations that combine good aesthetic with functionality by minimal destructive techniques. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the influence of the preparation designs on the fracture localisation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three preparation designs of porcelain veneers fabricated by a method of laying on a fireproof abutment on maxillary central incisor were examined in this in vitro study-feather preparation, bevel preparation and incisal overlap – palatal chamfer. The samples from all three groups were loaded into a universal test machine-TRITECH WF 10056 until damage occurred on the porcelain veneer. Fracture localisation was classified as an incisal, gingival or combination. Data were analysed with statistical programs: STATISTICA 7.1; SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: In feather preparation, as a consequence of the mechanical force, the most common is the incisal localisation (66.7%), followed by the combined (33.3%), while the gingival fracture localisation is not registered. In bevel preparation, the most common fracture localisation is combined (53.6%), followed by incisal (35.7%) and subsequent gingival localisation (10.7%). In incisal overlap (palatal chamfer), combined and gingival localisation of the fracture is equally recorded in 14.3% of the samples, while the incisal is the most common localisation and is registered in 72.4%. CONCLUSION: During the study, a statistically significant dependence was found between the localisation of the occurred changes (incisal, gingival and combination) and the three different types of preparation. Republic of Macedonia 2019-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6560282/ /pubmed/31210822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.323 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Katerina A. Zlatanovska, Cena Dimova, Nikola Gigovski, Vesna Korunoska-Stevkovska, Natasa Longurova. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Dental Science Zlatanovska, Katerina A. Dimova, Cena Gigovski, Nikola Korunoska-Stevkovska, Vesna Longurova, Natasa Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs |
title | Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs |
title_full | Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs |
title_fullStr | Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs |
title_full_unstemmed | Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs |
title_short | Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs |
title_sort | fracture localisation of porcelain veneers with different preparation designs |
topic | Dental Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zlatanovskakaterinaa fracturelocalisationofporcelainveneerswithdifferentpreparationdesigns AT dimovacena fracturelocalisationofporcelainveneerswithdifferentpreparationdesigns AT gigovskinikola fracturelocalisationofporcelainveneerswithdifferentpreparationdesigns AT korunoskastevkovskavesna fracturelocalisationofporcelainveneerswithdifferentpreparationdesigns AT longurovanatasa fracturelocalisationofporcelainveneerswithdifferentpreparationdesigns |