Cargando…

MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reimann, Carolin, Brangsch, Julia, Adams, Lisa Christine, Thöne-Reineke, Christa, Hamm, Bernd, Makowski, Marcus Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5461809
_version_ 1783425949802430464
author Reimann, Carolin
Brangsch, Julia
Adams, Lisa Christine
Thöne-Reineke, Christa
Hamm, Bernd
Makowski, Marcus Richard
author_facet Reimann, Carolin
Brangsch, Julia
Adams, Lisa Christine
Thöne-Reineke, Christa
Hamm, Bernd
Makowski, Marcus Richard
author_sort Reimann, Carolin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was tested. METHODS: All in vivo magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3T clinical system (Siemens). Non-contrast-enhanced (time-of-flight, TOF) and contrast-enhanced angiography (gadofosveset-trisodium, GdT) were performed in C57BL/6J mouse strain. Lumen-to-muscle ratios (LMRs) and area measurements were assessed. Histology was performed as reference standard of all relevant vascular structures. RESULTS: A close correlation between TOF (R (2) = 0.79; p < 0.05) and contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography (R (2) = 0.92; p < 0.05) with histological area measurements was found. LMRs were comparable between both sequences. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to non-contrast-enhanced (TOF) measurements (−0.73–0.89; R (2) = 0.81 vs. −0.55–0.56; R (2) = 0.94). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiographies of the head/neck vasculature of small animals can reliably performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner. Contrast-enhanced angiography enables the visualization of vascular structures with higher intravascular contrast and higher reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65603272019-07-02 MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System Reimann, Carolin Brangsch, Julia Adams, Lisa Christine Thöne-Reineke, Christa Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Richard Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was tested. METHODS: All in vivo magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3T clinical system (Siemens). Non-contrast-enhanced (time-of-flight, TOF) and contrast-enhanced angiography (gadofosveset-trisodium, GdT) were performed in C57BL/6J mouse strain. Lumen-to-muscle ratios (LMRs) and area measurements were assessed. Histology was performed as reference standard of all relevant vascular structures. RESULTS: A close correlation between TOF (R (2) = 0.79; p < 0.05) and contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography (R (2) = 0.92; p < 0.05) with histological area measurements was found. LMRs were comparable between both sequences. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to non-contrast-enhanced (TOF) measurements (−0.73–0.89; R (2) = 0.81 vs. −0.55–0.56; R (2) = 0.94). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiographies of the head/neck vasculature of small animals can reliably performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner. Contrast-enhanced angiography enables the visualization of vascular structures with higher intravascular contrast and higher reproducibility. Hindawi 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6560327/ /pubmed/31275084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5461809 Text en Copyright © 2019 Carolin Reimann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reimann, Carolin
Brangsch, Julia
Adams, Lisa Christine
Thöne-Reineke, Christa
Hamm, Bernd
Makowski, Marcus Richard
MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
title MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
title_full MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
title_fullStr MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
title_full_unstemmed MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
title_short MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
title_sort mr angiography of the head/neck vascular system in mice on a clinical mri system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5461809
work_keys_str_mv AT reimanncarolin mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem
AT brangschjulia mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem
AT adamslisachristine mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem
AT thonereinekechrista mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem
AT hammbernd mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem
AT makowskimarcusrichard mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem