Cargando…
MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5461809 |
_version_ | 1783425949802430464 |
---|---|
author | Reimann, Carolin Brangsch, Julia Adams, Lisa Christine Thöne-Reineke, Christa Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Richard |
author_facet | Reimann, Carolin Brangsch, Julia Adams, Lisa Christine Thöne-Reineke, Christa Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Richard |
author_sort | Reimann, Carolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was tested. METHODS: All in vivo magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3T clinical system (Siemens). Non-contrast-enhanced (time-of-flight, TOF) and contrast-enhanced angiography (gadofosveset-trisodium, GdT) were performed in C57BL/6J mouse strain. Lumen-to-muscle ratios (LMRs) and area measurements were assessed. Histology was performed as reference standard of all relevant vascular structures. RESULTS: A close correlation between TOF (R (2) = 0.79; p < 0.05) and contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography (R (2) = 0.92; p < 0.05) with histological area measurements was found. LMRs were comparable between both sequences. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to non-contrast-enhanced (TOF) measurements (−0.73–0.89; R (2) = 0.81 vs. −0.55–0.56; R (2) = 0.94). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiographies of the head/neck vasculature of small animals can reliably performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner. Contrast-enhanced angiography enables the visualization of vascular structures with higher intravascular contrast and higher reproducibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65603272019-07-02 MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System Reimann, Carolin Brangsch, Julia Adams, Lisa Christine Thöne-Reineke, Christa Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Richard Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was tested. METHODS: All in vivo magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3T clinical system (Siemens). Non-contrast-enhanced (time-of-flight, TOF) and contrast-enhanced angiography (gadofosveset-trisodium, GdT) were performed in C57BL/6J mouse strain. Lumen-to-muscle ratios (LMRs) and area measurements were assessed. Histology was performed as reference standard of all relevant vascular structures. RESULTS: A close correlation between TOF (R (2) = 0.79; p < 0.05) and contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography (R (2) = 0.92; p < 0.05) with histological area measurements was found. LMRs were comparable between both sequences. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to non-contrast-enhanced (TOF) measurements (−0.73–0.89; R (2) = 0.81 vs. −0.55–0.56; R (2) = 0.94). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiographies of the head/neck vasculature of small animals can reliably performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner. Contrast-enhanced angiography enables the visualization of vascular structures with higher intravascular contrast and higher reproducibility. Hindawi 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6560327/ /pubmed/31275084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5461809 Text en Copyright © 2019 Carolin Reimann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reimann, Carolin Brangsch, Julia Adams, Lisa Christine Thöne-Reineke, Christa Hamm, Bernd Makowski, Marcus Richard MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System |
title | MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System |
title_full | MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System |
title_fullStr | MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System |
title_full_unstemmed | MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System |
title_short | MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System |
title_sort | mr angiography of the head/neck vascular system in mice on a clinical mri system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5461809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reimanncarolin mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem AT brangschjulia mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem AT adamslisachristine mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem AT thonereinekechrista mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem AT hammbernd mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem AT makowskimarcusrichard mrangiographyoftheheadneckvascularsysteminmiceonaclinicalmrisystem |