Cargando…
Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication
Over the last four decades, volcano observatories have adopted a number of different communication strategies for the dissemination of information on changes in volcanic behaviour and potential hazards to a wide range of user groups. These commonly include a standardised volcano alert level system (...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1219-z |
_version_ | 1783425989803507712 |
---|---|
author | Fearnley, C. J. Beaven, S. |
author_facet | Fearnley, C. J. Beaven, S. |
author_sort | Fearnley, C. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the last four decades, volcano observatories have adopted a number of different communication strategies for the dissemination of information on changes in volcanic behaviour and potential hazards to a wide range of user groups. These commonly include a standardised volcano alert level system (VALS), used in conjunction with other uni-valent communication techniques (such as information statements, reports and maps) and multi-directional techniques (such as meetings and telephone calls). This research, based on interviews and observation conducted 2007–2009 at the five US Geological Survey (USGS) volcano observatories, and including some of the key users of the VALS, argues for the importance of understanding how communicating volcanic hazard information takes place as an everyday social practice, focusing on the challenges of working across the boundaries between the scientific and decision-making communities. It is now widely accepted that the effective use, value and deployment of information across science-policy interfaces of this kind depend on three criteria: the scientific credibility of the information, its relevance to the needs of stakeholders and the legitimacy of both the information and the processes that produced it. Translation and two-way communication are required to ensure that all involved understand what information is credible and relevant. Findings indicate that whilst VALS play a role in raising awareness of an unfolding situation, supplementary communication techniques are crucial in facilitating situational understanding of that situation, and the uncertainties inherent to its scientific assessment, as well as in facilitating specific responses. In consequence, ‘best practice’ recommendations eschew further standardisation, and focus on the in situ cultivation of dialogue between scientists and stakeholders as a means of ensuring that information, and the processes through which it is produced are perceived to be legitimate by all involved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65606532019-06-26 Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication Fearnley, C. J. Beaven, S. Bull Volcanol Review Article Over the last four decades, volcano observatories have adopted a number of different communication strategies for the dissemination of information on changes in volcanic behaviour and potential hazards to a wide range of user groups. These commonly include a standardised volcano alert level system (VALS), used in conjunction with other uni-valent communication techniques (such as information statements, reports and maps) and multi-directional techniques (such as meetings and telephone calls). This research, based on interviews and observation conducted 2007–2009 at the five US Geological Survey (USGS) volcano observatories, and including some of the key users of the VALS, argues for the importance of understanding how communicating volcanic hazard information takes place as an everyday social practice, focusing on the challenges of working across the boundaries between the scientific and decision-making communities. It is now widely accepted that the effective use, value and deployment of information across science-policy interfaces of this kind depend on three criteria: the scientific credibility of the information, its relevance to the needs of stakeholders and the legitimacy of both the information and the processes that produced it. Translation and two-way communication are required to ensure that all involved understand what information is credible and relevant. Findings indicate that whilst VALS play a role in raising awareness of an unfolding situation, supplementary communication techniques are crucial in facilitating situational understanding of that situation, and the uncertainties inherent to its scientific assessment, as well as in facilitating specific responses. In consequence, ‘best practice’ recommendations eschew further standardisation, and focus on the in situ cultivation of dialogue between scientists and stakeholders as a means of ensuring that information, and the processes through which it is produced are perceived to be legitimate by all involved. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-04-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6560653/ /pubmed/31258238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1219-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Fearnley, C. J. Beaven, S. Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication |
title | Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication |
title_full | Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication |
title_fullStr | Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication |
title_full_unstemmed | Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication |
title_short | Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication |
title_sort | volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1219-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fearnleycj volcanoalertlevelsystemsmanagingthechallengesofeffectivevolcaniccrisiscommunication AT beavens volcanoalertlevelsystemsmanagingthechallengesofeffectivevolcaniccrisiscommunication |