Cargando…

Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and performance as axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) diagnostic feature of radiographic and MRI lesions ‘typical’ of axSpA of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and spine in a mechanical chronic back pain (CBP) population and in an axSpA cohort. METHODS: Cross-sectional m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molto, Anna, Gossec, Laure, Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine, Foltz, Violaine, Beaufort, Romain, Laredo, Jean-Denis, Richette, Pascal, Dieude, Philippe, Goupille, Philippe, Feydy, Antoine, Dougados, Maxime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000918
_version_ 1783425991658438656
author Molto, Anna
Gossec, Laure
Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine
Foltz, Violaine
Beaufort, Romain
Laredo, Jean-Denis
Richette, Pascal
Dieude, Philippe
Goupille, Philippe
Feydy, Antoine
Dougados, Maxime
author_facet Molto, Anna
Gossec, Laure
Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine
Foltz, Violaine
Beaufort, Romain
Laredo, Jean-Denis
Richette, Pascal
Dieude, Philippe
Goupille, Philippe
Feydy, Antoine
Dougados, Maxime
author_sort Molto, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and performance as axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) diagnostic feature of radiographic and MRI lesions ‘typical’ of axSpA of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and spine in a mechanical chronic back pain (CBP) population and in an axSpA cohort. METHODS: Cross-sectional multicentre study. Patients: (1) recent onset axSpA (DESIR cohort) and (2) mechanical non-axSpA CBP matched for age and gender (ILOS study). Imaging: radiographs and MR scans were performed identically in both groups. All images were centrally read, blinded for diagnosis and for other imaging findings in the same patient. Statistical analysis: prevalence of lesions ‘typical of axSpA’ were compared in both groups. Sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of each lesion (and combination of lesions) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients with CBP were included, and compared with 100 patients with recent onset axSpA. SIJ lesions were consistently more frequent in the axSpA group (35.0% vs 11.8% p<0.001, 35.0% vs 8.4% p<0.001% and 32.0% vs 10.0%. p<0.001 for modified New York criteria, MRI sacroiliitis and ≥3 erosions of the SIJ on MRI, respectively), and performed well (LR+ for ≥3 erosions 3.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.8)). Spine lesions were comparable across groups: radiographic lesions were rare, while all MRI lesions were frequent. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that ‘typical’ lesions can also be observed in patients with non-axSpA CBP but that SIJ lesions by all modalities remain the most valuable for diagnosis, including structural lesions of the SIJ. This suggests the potential interest of adding MRI SIJ structural lesions in the definition of MRI abnormalities for axSpA classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65606612019-06-26 Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study Molto, Anna Gossec, Laure Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine Foltz, Violaine Beaufort, Romain Laredo, Jean-Denis Richette, Pascal Dieude, Philippe Goupille, Philippe Feydy, Antoine Dougados, Maxime RMD Open Spondyloarthritis OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and performance as axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) diagnostic feature of radiographic and MRI lesions ‘typical’ of axSpA of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and spine in a mechanical chronic back pain (CBP) population and in an axSpA cohort. METHODS: Cross-sectional multicentre study. Patients: (1) recent onset axSpA (DESIR cohort) and (2) mechanical non-axSpA CBP matched for age and gender (ILOS study). Imaging: radiographs and MR scans were performed identically in both groups. All images were centrally read, blinded for diagnosis and for other imaging findings in the same patient. Statistical analysis: prevalence of lesions ‘typical of axSpA’ were compared in both groups. Sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of each lesion (and combination of lesions) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients with CBP were included, and compared with 100 patients with recent onset axSpA. SIJ lesions were consistently more frequent in the axSpA group (35.0% vs 11.8% p<0.001, 35.0% vs 8.4% p<0.001% and 32.0% vs 10.0%. p<0.001 for modified New York criteria, MRI sacroiliitis and ≥3 erosions of the SIJ on MRI, respectively), and performed well (LR+ for ≥3 erosions 3.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.8)). Spine lesions were comparable across groups: radiographic lesions were rare, while all MRI lesions were frequent. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that ‘typical’ lesions can also be observed in patients with non-axSpA CBP but that SIJ lesions by all modalities remain the most valuable for diagnosis, including structural lesions of the SIJ. This suggests the potential interest of adding MRI SIJ structural lesions in the definition of MRI abnormalities for axSpA classification. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6560661/ /pubmed/31245053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000918 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Spondyloarthritis
Molto, Anna
Gossec, Laure
Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine
Foltz, Violaine
Beaufort, Romain
Laredo, Jean-Denis
Richette, Pascal
Dieude, Philippe
Goupille, Philippe
Feydy, Antoine
Dougados, Maxime
Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study
title Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study
title_full Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study
title_short Evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ILOS-DESIR study
title_sort evaluation of the performances of ‘typical’ imaging abnormalities of axial spondyloarthritis: results of the cross-sectional ilos-desir study
topic Spondyloarthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000918
work_keys_str_mv AT moltoanna evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT gosseclaure evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT lefevrecolaumariemartine evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT foltzviolaine evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT beaufortromain evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT laredojeandenis evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT richettepascal evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT dieudephilippe evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT goupillephilippe evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT feydyantoine evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy
AT dougadosmaxime evaluationoftheperformancesoftypicalimagingabnormalitiesofaxialspondyloarthritisresultsofthecrosssectionalilosdesirstudy