Cargando…

Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients

BACKGROUND: A new zero-fluoroscopy technique for electrophysiology catheter navigation relying on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been recently reported (Ice&ICE trial). We investigated potential differences in efficacy, safety or procedural performance between conventional fluoroscopy-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luani, Blerim, Rauwolf, Thomas, Genz, Conrad, Schmeißer, Alexander, Wiemer, Marcus, Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-019-0162-2
_version_ 1783426009465356288
author Luani, Blerim
Rauwolf, Thomas
Genz, Conrad
Schmeißer, Alexander
Wiemer, Marcus
Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger C.
author_facet Luani, Blerim
Rauwolf, Thomas
Genz, Conrad
Schmeißer, Alexander
Wiemer, Marcus
Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger C.
author_sort Luani, Blerim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A new zero-fluoroscopy technique for electrophysiology catheter navigation relying on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been recently reported (Ice&ICE trial). We investigated potential differences in efficacy, safety or procedural performance between conventional fluoroscopy- and ICE-guided cryothermal ablation (CA) in symptomatic AVNRT patients. METHODS: Clinical and electrophysiological data of AVNRT patients included in the Ice&ICE trial (22 patients, 16 females; =zero-fluoroscopy group) were compared to those of consecutive AVNRT patients, who underwent fluoroscopy-guided CA (25 patients, 17 females; = fluoroscopy group) during the last 2 years in our institution. RESULTS: Slow pathway ablation or modulation was successful in all patients. Fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in the fluoroscopy group were 11.2 ± 9.0 min and 20.3 ± 16.2Gycm(2), whereas no fluoroscopy was used in the opposite group (p <  0.001, respectively). EPS duration was not different between the groups (zero-fluoroscopy:101.6 ± 40.2 min, fluoroscopy:99.4 ± 37.2 min, p = n.s.). Catheter placement time was significantly shorter in the fluoroscopy group (2.2 ± 1.6 min vs. 12.0 ± 7.5 min, p <  0.05), whereas cryo-application duration (from the first cryo-mapping to the last CA) was significantly shorter in the zero-fluoroscopy group (27.5 ± 37.0 min vs. 38.1 ± 33.9 min, p <  0.05). Mean cryo-mapping and CA applications were numerically lower in the zero-fluoroscopy group (CM:7.5 ± 5.7 vs. 8.8 ± 6.2; CA:3.1 ± 1.7 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0, p = n.s.). No major adverse events occurred in both groups. After 15.0 ± 4.2 months, arrhythmia recurrence was not different between the groups (4.5% vs. 8.0%, p = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Zero-fluoroscopy ICE-guided EP catheter navigation shows comparable efficacy and safety to fluoroscopic guidance during CA in AVNRT patients. ICE visualization of catheters and endocardial structures within the triangle of Koch shortens the cryo-application duration, though time needed for catheter placement is longer, when compared with conventional fluoroscopic guidance, which results in similar mean EPS duration with both navigation techniques. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00011360; Registration Date 14.12.2016) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12947-019-0162-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65607402019-06-14 Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients Luani, Blerim Rauwolf, Thomas Genz, Conrad Schmeißer, Alexander Wiemer, Marcus Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger C. Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: A new zero-fluoroscopy technique for electrophysiology catheter navigation relying on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been recently reported (Ice&ICE trial). We investigated potential differences in efficacy, safety or procedural performance between conventional fluoroscopy- and ICE-guided cryothermal ablation (CA) in symptomatic AVNRT patients. METHODS: Clinical and electrophysiological data of AVNRT patients included in the Ice&ICE trial (22 patients, 16 females; =zero-fluoroscopy group) were compared to those of consecutive AVNRT patients, who underwent fluoroscopy-guided CA (25 patients, 17 females; = fluoroscopy group) during the last 2 years in our institution. RESULTS: Slow pathway ablation or modulation was successful in all patients. Fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in the fluoroscopy group were 11.2 ± 9.0 min and 20.3 ± 16.2Gycm(2), whereas no fluoroscopy was used in the opposite group (p <  0.001, respectively). EPS duration was not different between the groups (zero-fluoroscopy:101.6 ± 40.2 min, fluoroscopy:99.4 ± 37.2 min, p = n.s.). Catheter placement time was significantly shorter in the fluoroscopy group (2.2 ± 1.6 min vs. 12.0 ± 7.5 min, p <  0.05), whereas cryo-application duration (from the first cryo-mapping to the last CA) was significantly shorter in the zero-fluoroscopy group (27.5 ± 37.0 min vs. 38.1 ± 33.9 min, p <  0.05). Mean cryo-mapping and CA applications were numerically lower in the zero-fluoroscopy group (CM:7.5 ± 5.7 vs. 8.8 ± 6.2; CA:3.1 ± 1.7 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0, p = n.s.). No major adverse events occurred in both groups. After 15.0 ± 4.2 months, arrhythmia recurrence was not different between the groups (4.5% vs. 8.0%, p = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Zero-fluoroscopy ICE-guided EP catheter navigation shows comparable efficacy and safety to fluoroscopic guidance during CA in AVNRT patients. ICE visualization of catheters and endocardial structures within the triangle of Koch shortens the cryo-application duration, though time needed for catheter placement is longer, when compared with conventional fluoroscopic guidance, which results in similar mean EPS duration with both navigation techniques. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00011360; Registration Date 14.12.2016) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12947-019-0162-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6560740/ /pubmed/31186001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-019-0162-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Luani, Blerim
Rauwolf, Thomas
Genz, Conrad
Schmeißer, Alexander
Wiemer, Marcus
Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger C.
Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients
title Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients
title_full Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients
title_fullStr Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients
title_full_unstemmed Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients
title_short Intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT patients
title_sort intracardiac echocardiography versus fluoroscopy for endovascular and endocardial catheter navigation during cryo-ablation of the slow pathway in avnrt patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-019-0162-2
work_keys_str_mv AT luaniblerim intracardiacechocardiographyversusfluoroscopyforendovascularandendocardialcatheternavigationduringcryoablationoftheslowpathwayinavnrtpatients
AT rauwolfthomas intracardiacechocardiographyversusfluoroscopyforendovascularandendocardialcatheternavigationduringcryoablationoftheslowpathwayinavnrtpatients
AT genzconrad intracardiacechocardiographyversusfluoroscopyforendovascularandendocardialcatheternavigationduringcryoablationoftheslowpathwayinavnrtpatients
AT schmeißeralexander intracardiacechocardiographyversusfluoroscopyforendovascularandendocardialcatheternavigationduringcryoablationoftheslowpathwayinavnrtpatients
AT wiemermarcus intracardiacechocardiographyversusfluoroscopyforendovascularandendocardialcatheternavigationduringcryoablationoftheslowpathwayinavnrtpatients
AT braundullaeusrudigerc intracardiacechocardiographyversusfluoroscopyforendovascularandendocardialcatheternavigationduringcryoablationoftheslowpathwayinavnrtpatients