Cargando…
The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?
X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maxim...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819852810 |
_version_ | 1783426026030759936 |
---|---|
author | Oakley, Paul A. Ehsani, Niousha Navid Harrison, Deed E. |
author_facet | Oakley, Paul A. Ehsani, Niousha Navid Harrison, Deed E. |
author_sort | Oakley, Paul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maximum estimated dose of 10 to 25 mGy. Some patients, those getting diagnosed at a younger age and receiving early and ongoing treatments, may receive up to 40 to 50 X-rays, approaching at most 50 mGy. There are concerns that repeated radiographs given to patients are carcinogenic. Some studies have used the linear no-threshold model to derive cancer-risk estimates; however, it is invalid for low-dose irradiation (ie, X-rays); these estimates are untrue. Other studies have calculated cancer-risk ratios from long-term health data of historic scoliosis cohorts. Since data indicate reduced cancer rates in a cohort receiving a total radiation dose between 50 and 300 mGy, it is unlikely that scoliosis patients would get cancer from repeated X-rays. Moreover, since the threshold for leukemia is about 1100 mGy, scoliosis patients will not likely develop cancers from spinal X-rays. Scoliosis patients likely have long-term health consequences, including cancers, from the actual disease entity itself and not from protracted X-ray radiation exposures that are essential and indeed safe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65608082019-06-19 The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? Oakley, Paul A. Ehsani, Niousha Navid Harrison, Deed E. Dose Response Commentary X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maximum estimated dose of 10 to 25 mGy. Some patients, those getting diagnosed at a younger age and receiving early and ongoing treatments, may receive up to 40 to 50 X-rays, approaching at most 50 mGy. There are concerns that repeated radiographs given to patients are carcinogenic. Some studies have used the linear no-threshold model to derive cancer-risk estimates; however, it is invalid for low-dose irradiation (ie, X-rays); these estimates are untrue. Other studies have calculated cancer-risk ratios from long-term health data of historic scoliosis cohorts. Since data indicate reduced cancer rates in a cohort receiving a total radiation dose between 50 and 300 mGy, it is unlikely that scoliosis patients would get cancer from repeated X-rays. Moreover, since the threshold for leukemia is about 1100 mGy, scoliosis patients will not likely develop cancers from spinal X-rays. Scoliosis patients likely have long-term health consequences, including cancers, from the actual disease entity itself and not from protracted X-ray radiation exposures that are essential and indeed safe. SAGE Publications 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6560808/ /pubmed/31217755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819852810 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Oakley, Paul A. Ehsani, Niousha Navid Harrison, Deed E. The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? |
title | The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? |
title_full | The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? |
title_fullStr | The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? |
title_short | The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? |
title_sort | scoliosis quandary: are radiation exposures from repeated x-rays harmful? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819852810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oakleypaula thescoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful AT ehsaninioushanavid thescoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful AT harrisondeede thescoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful AT oakleypaula scoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful AT ehsaninioushanavid scoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful AT harrisondeede scoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful |