Cargando…

The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?

X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maxim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oakley, Paul A., Ehsani, Niousha Navid, Harrison, Deed E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819852810
_version_ 1783426026030759936
author Oakley, Paul A.
Ehsani, Niousha Navid
Harrison, Deed E.
author_facet Oakley, Paul A.
Ehsani, Niousha Navid
Harrison, Deed E.
author_sort Oakley, Paul A.
collection PubMed
description X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maximum estimated dose of 10 to 25 mGy. Some patients, those getting diagnosed at a younger age and receiving early and ongoing treatments, may receive up to 40 to 50 X-rays, approaching at most 50 mGy. There are concerns that repeated radiographs given to patients are carcinogenic. Some studies have used the linear no-threshold model to derive cancer-risk estimates; however, it is invalid for low-dose irradiation (ie, X-rays); these estimates are untrue. Other studies have calculated cancer-risk ratios from long-term health data of historic scoliosis cohorts. Since data indicate reduced cancer rates in a cohort receiving a total radiation dose between 50 and 300 mGy, it is unlikely that scoliosis patients would get cancer from repeated X-rays. Moreover, since the threshold for leukemia is about 1100 mGy, scoliosis patients will not likely develop cancers from spinal X-rays. Scoliosis patients likely have long-term health consequences, including cancers, from the actual disease entity itself and not from protracted X-ray radiation exposures that are essential and indeed safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65608082019-06-19 The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? Oakley, Paul A. Ehsani, Niousha Navid Harrison, Deed E. Dose Response Commentary X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maximum estimated dose of 10 to 25 mGy. Some patients, those getting diagnosed at a younger age and receiving early and ongoing treatments, may receive up to 40 to 50 X-rays, approaching at most 50 mGy. There are concerns that repeated radiographs given to patients are carcinogenic. Some studies have used the linear no-threshold model to derive cancer-risk estimates; however, it is invalid for low-dose irradiation (ie, X-rays); these estimates are untrue. Other studies have calculated cancer-risk ratios from long-term health data of historic scoliosis cohorts. Since data indicate reduced cancer rates in a cohort receiving a total radiation dose between 50 and 300 mGy, it is unlikely that scoliosis patients would get cancer from repeated X-rays. Moreover, since the threshold for leukemia is about 1100 mGy, scoliosis patients will not likely develop cancers from spinal X-rays. Scoliosis patients likely have long-term health consequences, including cancers, from the actual disease entity itself and not from protracted X-ray radiation exposures that are essential and indeed safe. SAGE Publications 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6560808/ /pubmed/31217755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819852810 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Commentary
Oakley, Paul A.
Ehsani, Niousha Navid
Harrison, Deed E.
The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?
title The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?
title_full The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?
title_fullStr The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?
title_full_unstemmed The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?
title_short The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?
title_sort scoliosis quandary: are radiation exposures from repeated x-rays harmful?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819852810
work_keys_str_mv AT oakleypaula thescoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful
AT ehsaninioushanavid thescoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful
AT harrisondeede thescoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful
AT oakleypaula scoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful
AT ehsaninioushanavid scoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful
AT harrisondeede scoliosisquandaryareradiationexposuresfromrepeatedxraysharmful