Cargando…
Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain is the largest limiting factor in this technique. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of analgesics for pain management used during ESWL sessions. We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients with urinary lithiasis ju...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31223399 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690 |
_version_ | 1783426063795224576 |
---|---|
author | Daly, Kheireddine Mrad Chaker, Kays Rhouma, Sami Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben Ouanes, Yassine Sellami, Ahmed Nouira, Yassine |
author_facet | Daly, Kheireddine Mrad Chaker, Kays Rhouma, Sami Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben Ouanes, Yassine Sellami, Ahmed Nouira, Yassine |
author_sort | Daly, Kheireddine Mrad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain is the largest limiting factor in this technique. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of analgesics for pain management used during ESWL sessions. We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients with urinary lithiasis justifying ESWL treatment. The patients were randomized to three groups: group I, included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of 2cc of physiological saline solution (placebo), group II included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of ketoprofen 100mg while group III included 100 patients who received lidocaine and prilocaine topical cream. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain 10 minutes after and at the end of the session. Mean VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was 3.7 and 4.91 respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups with respect to: epidemiological data (age, sex, BMI, patient’s history) and the characteristics of the renal stone (side, size, location, presence or not of double-J ureteral catheter). Eleven patients in the Group I terminated treatment early, with a significant difference compared to the other groups (p=0.003). VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was statistically higher in Group I compared to Groups II and III (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESWL session was significantly more effective in Groups (II and III) compared to Group I (p<0.001). Pain treatment is necessary during ESWL sessions. Two painkillers molecules were assessed, which showed good pain control as well as an increase in the effectiveness of lithotripsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6560981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65609812019-06-20 Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle Daly, Kheireddine Mrad Chaker, Kays Rhouma, Sami Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben Ouanes, Yassine Sellami, Ahmed Nouira, Yassine Pan Afr Med J Case Series Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain is the largest limiting factor in this technique. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of analgesics for pain management used during ESWL sessions. We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients with urinary lithiasis justifying ESWL treatment. The patients were randomized to three groups: group I, included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of 2cc of physiological saline solution (placebo), group II included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of ketoprofen 100mg while group III included 100 patients who received lidocaine and prilocaine topical cream. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain 10 minutes after and at the end of the session. Mean VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was 3.7 and 4.91 respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups with respect to: epidemiological data (age, sex, BMI, patient’s history) and the characteristics of the renal stone (side, size, location, presence or not of double-J ureteral catheter). Eleven patients in the Group I terminated treatment early, with a significant difference compared to the other groups (p=0.003). VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was statistically higher in Group I compared to Groups II and III (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESWL session was significantly more effective in Groups (II and III) compared to Group I (p<0.001). Pain treatment is necessary during ESWL sessions. Two painkillers molecules were assessed, which showed good pain control as well as an increase in the effectiveness of lithotripsy. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6560981/ /pubmed/31223399 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690 Text en © Kheireddine Mrad Daly et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Series Daly, Kheireddine Mrad Chaker, Kays Rhouma, Sami Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben Ouanes, Yassine Sellami, Ahmed Nouira, Yassine Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle |
title | Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle |
title_full | Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle |
title_fullStr | Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle |
title_short | Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle |
title_sort | evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31223399 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalykheireddinemrad evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle AT chakerkays evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle AT rhoumasamiben evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle AT chehidamohamedaliben evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle AT ouanesyassine evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle AT sellamiahmed evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle AT nouirayassine evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle |