Cargando…

Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain is the largest limiting factor in this technique. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of analgesics for pain management used during ESWL sessions. We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients with urinary lithiasis ju...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daly, Kheireddine Mrad, Chaker, Kays, Rhouma, Sami Ben, Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben, Ouanes, Yassine, Sellami, Ahmed, Nouira, Yassine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The African Field Epidemiology Network 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31223399
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690
_version_ 1783426063795224576
author Daly, Kheireddine Mrad
Chaker, Kays
Rhouma, Sami Ben
Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben
Ouanes, Yassine
Sellami, Ahmed
Nouira, Yassine
author_facet Daly, Kheireddine Mrad
Chaker, Kays
Rhouma, Sami Ben
Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben
Ouanes, Yassine
Sellami, Ahmed
Nouira, Yassine
author_sort Daly, Kheireddine Mrad
collection PubMed
description Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain is the largest limiting factor in this technique. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of analgesics for pain management used during ESWL sessions. We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients with urinary lithiasis justifying ESWL treatment. The patients were randomized to three groups: group I, included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of 2cc of physiological saline solution (placebo), group II included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of ketoprofen 100mg while group III included 100 patients who received lidocaine and prilocaine topical cream. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain 10 minutes after and at the end of the session. Mean VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was 3.7 and 4.91 respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups with respect to: epidemiological data (age, sex, BMI, patient’s history) and the characteristics of the renal stone (side, size, location, presence or not of double-J ureteral catheter). Eleven patients in the Group I terminated treatment early, with a significant difference compared to the other groups (p=0.003). VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was statistically higher in Group I compared to Groups II and III (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESWL session was significantly more effective in Groups (II and III) compared to Group I (p<0.001). Pain treatment is necessary during ESWL sessions. Two painkillers molecules were assessed, which showed good pain control as well as an increase in the effectiveness of lithotripsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6560981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The African Field Epidemiology Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65609812019-06-20 Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle Daly, Kheireddine Mrad Chaker, Kays Rhouma, Sami Ben Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben Ouanes, Yassine Sellami, Ahmed Nouira, Yassine Pan Afr Med J Case Series Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain is the largest limiting factor in this technique. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of analgesics for pain management used during ESWL sessions. We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients with urinary lithiasis justifying ESWL treatment. The patients were randomized to three groups: group I, included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of 2cc of physiological saline solution (placebo), group II included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of ketoprofen 100mg while group III included 100 patients who received lidocaine and prilocaine topical cream. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain 10 minutes after and at the end of the session. Mean VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was 3.7 and 4.91 respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups with respect to: epidemiological data (age, sex, BMI, patient’s history) and the characteristics of the renal stone (side, size, location, presence or not of double-J ureteral catheter). Eleven patients in the Group I terminated treatment early, with a significant difference compared to the other groups (p=0.003). VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was statistically higher in Group I compared to Groups II and III (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESWL session was significantly more effective in Groups (II and III) compared to Group I (p<0.001). Pain treatment is necessary during ESWL sessions. Two painkillers molecules were assessed, which showed good pain control as well as an increase in the effectiveness of lithotripsy. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6560981/ /pubmed/31223399 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690 Text en © Kheireddine Mrad Daly et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Series
Daly, Kheireddine Mrad
Chaker, Kays
Rhouma, Sami Ben
Chehida, Mohamed Ali Ben
Ouanes, Yassine
Sellami, Ahmed
Nouira, Yassine
Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
title Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
title_full Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
title_fullStr Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
title_short Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
title_sort evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31223399
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690
work_keys_str_mv AT dalykheireddinemrad evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle
AT chakerkays evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle
AT rhoumasamiben evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle
AT chehidamohamedaliben evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle
AT ouanesyassine evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle
AT sellamiahmed evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle
AT nouirayassine evaluationdesprotocolesanalgesiquespourlapriseenchargedeladouleuraucoursdelalithotripsieextracorporelle