Cargando…
Objecting to experiments that compare two unobjectionable policies or treatments
Randomized experiments have enormous potential to improve human welfare in many domains, including healthcare, education, finance, and public policy. However, such “A/B tests” are often criticized on ethical grounds even as similar, untested interventions are implemented without objection. We find r...
Autores principales: | Meyer, Michelle N., Heck, Patrick R., Holtzman, Geoffrey S., Anderson, Stephen M., Cai, William, Watts, Duncan J., Chabris, Christopher F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6561206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820701116 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Objecting to experiments even while approving of the policies or treatments they compare
por: Heck, Patrick R., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
An Unobjectionable Form for the Administration of Medicines
por: French, M. S.
Publicado: (1884) -
An illusion of predictability in scientific results: Even experts confuse inferential uncertainty and outcome variability
por: Zhang, Sam, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
65% of Americans believe they are above average in intelligence: Results of two nationally representative surveys
por: Heck, Patrick R., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Social Shapes Test as a Self-Administered, Online Measure of Social Intelligence: Two Studies with Typically Developing Adults and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder
por: Brown, Matt I., et al.
Publicado: (2023)