Cargando…
Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses
One of the greatest challenges of developmental psychology is figuring out what children are thinking. This is particularly difficult in early childhood, for children who are prelinguistic or are just beginning to speak their first words. In this stage, children’s responses are commonly measured by...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6561545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31188864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217207 |
_version_ | 1783426147332128768 |
---|---|
author | Sumner, Emily DeAngelis, Erika Hyatt, Mara Goodman, Noah Kidd, Celeste |
author_facet | Sumner, Emily DeAngelis, Erika Hyatt, Mara Goodman, Noah Kidd, Celeste |
author_sort | Sumner, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the greatest challenges of developmental psychology is figuring out what children are thinking. This is particularly difficult in early childhood, for children who are prelinguistic or are just beginning to speak their first words. In this stage, children’s responses are commonly measured by presenting young children with a limited choice between one of a small number of options (e.g., “Do you want X or Y?”). A tendency to choose one response in these tasks may be taken as an indication of a child’s preference or understanding. Adults’ responses are known to exhibit order biases when they are asked questions. The current set of experiments looks into the following question: do children demonstrate response biases? Together, we show that 1) toddlers demonstrate a robust verbal recency bias when asked “or” questions in a lab-based task and a naturalistic corpus of caretaker-child speech interactions, 2) the recency bias weakens with age, and 3) the recency bias strengthens as the syllable-length of the choices gets longer. Taken together, these results indicate that children show a different type of response bias than adults, recency instead of primacy. Further, the results may suggest that this bias stems from increased constraints on children’s working memory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6561545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65615452019-06-20 Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses Sumner, Emily DeAngelis, Erika Hyatt, Mara Goodman, Noah Kidd, Celeste PLoS One Research Article One of the greatest challenges of developmental psychology is figuring out what children are thinking. This is particularly difficult in early childhood, for children who are prelinguistic or are just beginning to speak their first words. In this stage, children’s responses are commonly measured by presenting young children with a limited choice between one of a small number of options (e.g., “Do you want X or Y?”). A tendency to choose one response in these tasks may be taken as an indication of a child’s preference or understanding. Adults’ responses are known to exhibit order biases when they are asked questions. The current set of experiments looks into the following question: do children demonstrate response biases? Together, we show that 1) toddlers demonstrate a robust verbal recency bias when asked “or” questions in a lab-based task and a naturalistic corpus of caretaker-child speech interactions, 2) the recency bias weakens with age, and 3) the recency bias strengthens as the syllable-length of the choices gets longer. Taken together, these results indicate that children show a different type of response bias than adults, recency instead of primacy. Further, the results may suggest that this bias stems from increased constraints on children’s working memory. Public Library of Science 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6561545/ /pubmed/31188864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217207 Text en © 2019 Sumner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sumner, Emily DeAngelis, Erika Hyatt, Mara Goodman, Noah Kidd, Celeste Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses |
title | Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses |
title_full | Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses |
title_fullStr | Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses |
title_short | Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses |
title_sort | cake or broccoli? recency biases children’s verbal responses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6561545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31188864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sumneremily cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses AT deangeliserika cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses AT hyattmara cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses AT goodmannoah cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses AT kiddceleste cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses |