Cargando…

Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses

One of the greatest challenges of developmental psychology is figuring out what children are thinking. This is particularly difficult in early childhood, for children who are prelinguistic or are just beginning to speak their first words. In this stage, children’s responses are commonly measured by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sumner, Emily, DeAngelis, Erika, Hyatt, Mara, Goodman, Noah, Kidd, Celeste
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6561545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31188864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217207
_version_ 1783426147332128768
author Sumner, Emily
DeAngelis, Erika
Hyatt, Mara
Goodman, Noah
Kidd, Celeste
author_facet Sumner, Emily
DeAngelis, Erika
Hyatt, Mara
Goodman, Noah
Kidd, Celeste
author_sort Sumner, Emily
collection PubMed
description One of the greatest challenges of developmental psychology is figuring out what children are thinking. This is particularly difficult in early childhood, for children who are prelinguistic or are just beginning to speak their first words. In this stage, children’s responses are commonly measured by presenting young children with a limited choice between one of a small number of options (e.g., “Do you want X or Y?”). A tendency to choose one response in these tasks may be taken as an indication of a child’s preference or understanding. Adults’ responses are known to exhibit order biases when they are asked questions. The current set of experiments looks into the following question: do children demonstrate response biases? Together, we show that 1) toddlers demonstrate a robust verbal recency bias when asked “or” questions in a lab-based task and a naturalistic corpus of caretaker-child speech interactions, 2) the recency bias weakens with age, and 3) the recency bias strengthens as the syllable-length of the choices gets longer. Taken together, these results indicate that children show a different type of response bias than adults, recency instead of primacy. Further, the results may suggest that this bias stems from increased constraints on children’s working memory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6561545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65615452019-06-20 Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses Sumner, Emily DeAngelis, Erika Hyatt, Mara Goodman, Noah Kidd, Celeste PLoS One Research Article One of the greatest challenges of developmental psychology is figuring out what children are thinking. This is particularly difficult in early childhood, for children who are prelinguistic or are just beginning to speak their first words. In this stage, children’s responses are commonly measured by presenting young children with a limited choice between one of a small number of options (e.g., “Do you want X or Y?”). A tendency to choose one response in these tasks may be taken as an indication of a child’s preference or understanding. Adults’ responses are known to exhibit order biases when they are asked questions. The current set of experiments looks into the following question: do children demonstrate response biases? Together, we show that 1) toddlers demonstrate a robust verbal recency bias when asked “or” questions in a lab-based task and a naturalistic corpus of caretaker-child speech interactions, 2) the recency bias weakens with age, and 3) the recency bias strengthens as the syllable-length of the choices gets longer. Taken together, these results indicate that children show a different type of response bias than adults, recency instead of primacy. Further, the results may suggest that this bias stems from increased constraints on children’s working memory. Public Library of Science 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6561545/ /pubmed/31188864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217207 Text en © 2019 Sumner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sumner, Emily
DeAngelis, Erika
Hyatt, Mara
Goodman, Noah
Kidd, Celeste
Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses
title Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses
title_full Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses
title_fullStr Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses
title_full_unstemmed Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses
title_short Cake or broccoli? Recency biases children’s verbal responses
title_sort cake or broccoli? recency biases children’s verbal responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6561545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31188864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217207
work_keys_str_mv AT sumneremily cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses
AT deangeliserika cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses
AT hyattmara cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses
AT goodmannoah cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses
AT kiddceleste cakeorbroccolirecencybiaseschildrensverbalresponses