Cargando…

(18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Objectives: To evaluate the ability of (18)F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) to predict survivorship of patients with bladder cancer (BC) and/or upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Materials: Data from patients who underwent FDG PET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zattoni, Fabio, Incerti, Elena, Dal Moro, Fabrizio, Moschini, Marco, Castellucci, Paolo, Panareo, Stefano, Picchio, Maria, Fallanca, Federico, Briganti, Alberto, Gallina, Andrea, Fanti, Stefano, Schiavina, Riccardo, Brunocilla, Eugenio, Rambaldi, Ilaria, Lowe, Val, Karnes, R. Jeffrey, Evangelista, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050700
_version_ 1783426294249160704
author Zattoni, Fabio
Incerti, Elena
Dal Moro, Fabrizio
Moschini, Marco
Castellucci, Paolo
Panareo, Stefano
Picchio, Maria
Fallanca, Federico
Briganti, Alberto
Gallina, Andrea
Fanti, Stefano
Schiavina, Riccardo
Brunocilla, Eugenio
Rambaldi, Ilaria
Lowe, Val
Karnes, R. Jeffrey
Evangelista, Laura
author_facet Zattoni, Fabio
Incerti, Elena
Dal Moro, Fabrizio
Moschini, Marco
Castellucci, Paolo
Panareo, Stefano
Picchio, Maria
Fallanca, Federico
Briganti, Alberto
Gallina, Andrea
Fanti, Stefano
Schiavina, Riccardo
Brunocilla, Eugenio
Rambaldi, Ilaria
Lowe, Val
Karnes, R. Jeffrey
Evangelista, Laura
author_sort Zattoni, Fabio
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To evaluate the ability of (18)F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) to predict survivorship of patients with bladder cancer (BC) and/or upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Materials: Data from patients who underwent FDG PET/CT for suspicion of recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively collected in a multicenter study. Disease management after the introduction of FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic algorithm was assessed in all patients. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were computed for survival assessment. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of recurrence and death, for BC, UUTC, and concomitant BC and UUTC. Results: Data from 286 patients were collected. Of these, 212 had a history of BC, 38 of UUTC and 36 of concomitant BC and UUTC. Patient management was changed in 114/286 (40%) UC patients with the inclusion of FDG PET/CT, particularly in those with BC, reaching 74% (n = 90/122). After a mean follow-up period of 21 months (Interquartile range: 4–28 mo.), 136 patients (47.4%) had recurrence/progression of disease. Moreover, 131 subjects (45.6%) died. At Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with BC and positive PET/CT had a worse overall survival than those with a negative scan (log-rank < 0.001). Furthermore, a negative PET/CT scan was associated with a lower recurrence rate than a positive examination, independently from the primary tumor site. At multivariate analysis, in patients with BC and UUTC, a positive FDG PET/CT resulted an independent predictor of disease-free and overall survival (p < 0,01). Conclusions: FDG PET/CT has the potential to change patient management, particularly for patients with BC. Furthermore, it can be considered a valid survival prediction tool after primary treatment in patients with recurrent UC. However, a firm recommendation cannot be made yet. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6562413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65624132019-06-17 (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study Zattoni, Fabio Incerti, Elena Dal Moro, Fabrizio Moschini, Marco Castellucci, Paolo Panareo, Stefano Picchio, Maria Fallanca, Federico Briganti, Alberto Gallina, Andrea Fanti, Stefano Schiavina, Riccardo Brunocilla, Eugenio Rambaldi, Ilaria Lowe, Val Karnes, R. Jeffrey Evangelista, Laura Cancers (Basel) Article Objectives: To evaluate the ability of (18)F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) to predict survivorship of patients with bladder cancer (BC) and/or upper urinary tract carcinoma (UUTC). Materials: Data from patients who underwent FDG PET/CT for suspicion of recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively collected in a multicenter study. Disease management after the introduction of FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic algorithm was assessed in all patients. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were computed for survival assessment. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of recurrence and death, for BC, UUTC, and concomitant BC and UUTC. Results: Data from 286 patients were collected. Of these, 212 had a history of BC, 38 of UUTC and 36 of concomitant BC and UUTC. Patient management was changed in 114/286 (40%) UC patients with the inclusion of FDG PET/CT, particularly in those with BC, reaching 74% (n = 90/122). After a mean follow-up period of 21 months (Interquartile range: 4–28 mo.), 136 patients (47.4%) had recurrence/progression of disease. Moreover, 131 subjects (45.6%) died. At Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with BC and positive PET/CT had a worse overall survival than those with a negative scan (log-rank < 0.001). Furthermore, a negative PET/CT scan was associated with a lower recurrence rate than a positive examination, independently from the primary tumor site. At multivariate analysis, in patients with BC and UUTC, a positive FDG PET/CT resulted an independent predictor of disease-free and overall survival (p < 0,01). Conclusions: FDG PET/CT has the potential to change patient management, particularly for patients with BC. Furthermore, it can be considered a valid survival prediction tool after primary treatment in patients with recurrent UC. However, a firm recommendation cannot be made yet. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings. MDPI 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6562413/ /pubmed/31137599 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050700 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zattoni, Fabio
Incerti, Elena
Dal Moro, Fabrizio
Moschini, Marco
Castellucci, Paolo
Panareo, Stefano
Picchio, Maria
Fallanca, Federico
Briganti, Alberto
Gallina, Andrea
Fanti, Stefano
Schiavina, Riccardo
Brunocilla, Eugenio
Rambaldi, Ilaria
Lowe, Val
Karnes, R. Jeffrey
Evangelista, Laura
(18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_full (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_fullStr (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_short (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Management and Prognosis—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_sort (18)f-fdg pet/ct and urothelial carcinoma: impact on management and prognosis—a multicenter retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050700
work_keys_str_mv AT zattonifabio 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT incertielena 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT dalmorofabrizio 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT moschinimarco 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT castelluccipaolo 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT panareostefano 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT picchiomaria 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT fallancafederico 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT brigantialberto 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT gallinaandrea 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT fantistefano 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT schiavinariccardo 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT brunocillaeugenio 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT rambaldiilaria 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT loweval 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT karnesrjeffrey 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT evangelistalaura 18ffdgpetctandurothelialcarcinomaimpactonmanagementandprognosisamulticenterretrospectivestudy