Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Early detection is important for improving the survival rate of patients with gastric cancer (GC). Serum tumor markers have been widely used for detecting GC. However, their clinical values remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the role of serum cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) in the dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Ping-Jen, Chen, Ming-Yao, Wu, Ming-Shun, Lin, Ying-Chin, Shih, Ping-Hsiao, Lai, Chih-Ho, Lin, Hwai-Jeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050733
_version_ 1783426318873919488
author Hu, Ping-Jen
Chen, Ming-Yao
Wu, Ming-Shun
Lin, Ying-Chin
Shih, Ping-Hsiao
Lai, Chih-Ho
Lin, Hwai-Jeng
author_facet Hu, Ping-Jen
Chen, Ming-Yao
Wu, Ming-Shun
Lin, Ying-Chin
Shih, Ping-Hsiao
Lai, Chih-Ho
Lin, Hwai-Jeng
author_sort Hu, Ping-Jen
collection PubMed
description Early detection is important for improving the survival rate of patients with gastric cancer (GC). Serum tumor markers have been widely used for detecting GC. However, their clinical values remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the role of serum cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) in the diagnosis of GC in a healthy population. A total of 7757 adults who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and serum CA72-4 level measurement in multicenters in Taiwan from January 2006 to August 2016 were recruited in this retrospective study. Risk factors for GC, serum tumor markers, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings were evaluated. High serum levels of CA72-4 were found in 7.2% of healthy adults. CA72-4 level showed lower sensitivity (33.3%) but higher specificity (92.8%); however, the positive predictive value was quite low (0.18%). After adjustment of clinical risk factors for GC using EGD findings, gastric ulcer (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.11), gastric polyps (aOR = 1.42), and atrophic gastritis (aOR = 1.27) were significantly associated with high serum CA72-4 levels. Furthermore, both age (OR = 1.01) and Helicobacter pylori infection (OR = 1.44) exhibited a significant association with high serum CA72-4 levels. These results indicate that routine screening of CA72-4 levels for diagnosing GC in asymptomatic patients may be ineffective due to low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The clinical utility of EGD findings along with serum CA72-4 level for screening healthy individuals with GC is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6562516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65625162019-06-17 Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study Hu, Ping-Jen Chen, Ming-Yao Wu, Ming-Shun Lin, Ying-Chin Shih, Ping-Hsiao Lai, Chih-Ho Lin, Hwai-Jeng Cancers (Basel) Article Early detection is important for improving the survival rate of patients with gastric cancer (GC). Serum tumor markers have been widely used for detecting GC. However, their clinical values remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the role of serum cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) in the diagnosis of GC in a healthy population. A total of 7757 adults who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and serum CA72-4 level measurement in multicenters in Taiwan from January 2006 to August 2016 were recruited in this retrospective study. Risk factors for GC, serum tumor markers, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings were evaluated. High serum levels of CA72-4 were found in 7.2% of healthy adults. CA72-4 level showed lower sensitivity (33.3%) but higher specificity (92.8%); however, the positive predictive value was quite low (0.18%). After adjustment of clinical risk factors for GC using EGD findings, gastric ulcer (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.11), gastric polyps (aOR = 1.42), and atrophic gastritis (aOR = 1.27) were significantly associated with high serum CA72-4 levels. Furthermore, both age (OR = 1.01) and Helicobacter pylori infection (OR = 1.44) exhibited a significant association with high serum CA72-4 levels. These results indicate that routine screening of CA72-4 levels for diagnosing GC in asymptomatic patients may be ineffective due to low sensitivity and low positive predictive value. The clinical utility of EGD findings along with serum CA72-4 level for screening healthy individuals with GC is warranted. MDPI 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6562516/ /pubmed/31137895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050733 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hu, Ping-Jen
Chen, Ming-Yao
Wu, Ming-Shun
Lin, Ying-Chin
Shih, Ping-Hsiao
Lai, Chih-Ho
Lin, Hwai-Jeng
Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_full Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_short Clinical Evaluation of CA72-4 for Screening Gastric Cancer in a Healthy Population: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
title_sort clinical evaluation of ca72-4 for screening gastric cancer in a healthy population: a multicenter retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050733
work_keys_str_mv AT hupingjen clinicalevaluationofca724forscreeninggastriccancerinahealthypopulationamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT chenmingyao clinicalevaluationofca724forscreeninggastriccancerinahealthypopulationamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT wumingshun clinicalevaluationofca724forscreeninggastriccancerinahealthypopulationamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT linyingchin clinicalevaluationofca724forscreeninggastriccancerinahealthypopulationamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT shihpinghsiao clinicalevaluationofca724forscreeninggastriccancerinahealthypopulationamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT laichihho clinicalevaluationofca724forscreeninggastriccancerinahealthypopulationamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT linhwaijeng clinicalevaluationofca724forscreeninggastriccancerinahealthypopulationamulticenterretrospectivestudy