Cargando…

Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Preference tests allow the study of some aspects of the feeding behavior of domestic dogs. However, besides sensorial proprieties of food, intrinsic characteristics of dogs may play a role in diet selection. The aim of this study was to describe the feeding behavior of dogs in relati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alegría-Morán, Raúl A., Guzmán-Pino, Sergio A., Egaña, Juan Ignacio, Muñoz, Carem, Figueroa, Jaime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9050219
_version_ 1783426411024875520
author Alegría-Morán, Raúl A.
Guzmán-Pino, Sergio A.
Egaña, Juan Ignacio
Muñoz, Carem
Figueroa, Jaime
author_facet Alegría-Morán, Raúl A.
Guzmán-Pino, Sergio A.
Egaña, Juan Ignacio
Muñoz, Carem
Figueroa, Jaime
author_sort Alegría-Morán, Raúl A.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Preference tests allow the study of some aspects of the feeding behavior of domestic dogs. However, besides sensorial proprieties of food, intrinsic characteristics of dogs may play a role in diet selection. The aim of this study was to describe the feeding behavior of dogs in relation to diet composition and their intrinsic variables (age, breed, sex, and body weight) by using a ten-year database of two-feeder food preference tests (2007–2017). The content of less digestible fractions like crude fiber and dry matter negatively affected dogs’ food preferences. In addition, animals’ weight and breed influenced dogs’ intake of the most preferred diets, where heaviest dogs presented lower intakes as did the Beagle breed in relation with both Boxer and Labrador Retrievers. Moreover, the hot season of the year decreased dogs’ intake of preferred diets. In terms of preferences, Boxers presented a lower preference for selected diets compared to the other breeds. Finally, age and sex did not affect dogs’ preference or intake of the foods selected. The understanding of the relationships between food composition and intrinsic variables of dogs with their diet selection could improve specific pet food formulation in order to satisfy animals’ physiological and hedonic needs. ABSTRACT: A ten-year food preference database (2007–2017) was used to relate food selection in dogs to the nutritional components of diets by doing a principal component analysis (PCA) and a linear regression between components obtained and dogs’ preferences. Intake and preference of preferred diets were analyzed by dogs’ sex, breed, age, body weight, and the season of the year (hot or cold). The fourth component after PCA presented a relation with food preferences (OR = −2.699, p = 0.026), showing negative correlations with crude fiber (rho = −0.196; P = 0.038) and dry matter (rho = −0.184; p = 0.049). Weight (OR = −1.35; p < 0.001), breed, both Boxer (OR = 10.62; p = 0.003) and Labrador Retriever (OR = 26.30; p < 0.001), and season (hot season) (OR = −5.27; p < 0.001) all influenced animals’ intake. Boxers presented a lower food preference compared to the other breeds (OR = −44.3; p < 0.001), while animals’ weight influenced preferences only in Boxers (OR = 2.02; p < 0.001). Finally, age and sex did not affect dogs’ preference or intake of preferred diets. Thus dry matter and fiber content have a negative impact on dogs’ food choices. Dogs’ weight, breed, and season affected food intake, but only breed affected dogs’ preferences, which is probably explained by adaptive changes in the detection, metabolization, and learning of nutritive food cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6562821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65628212019-06-17 Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection Alegría-Morán, Raúl A. Guzmán-Pino, Sergio A. Egaña, Juan Ignacio Muñoz, Carem Figueroa, Jaime Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Preference tests allow the study of some aspects of the feeding behavior of domestic dogs. However, besides sensorial proprieties of food, intrinsic characteristics of dogs may play a role in diet selection. The aim of this study was to describe the feeding behavior of dogs in relation to diet composition and their intrinsic variables (age, breed, sex, and body weight) by using a ten-year database of two-feeder food preference tests (2007–2017). The content of less digestible fractions like crude fiber and dry matter negatively affected dogs’ food preferences. In addition, animals’ weight and breed influenced dogs’ intake of the most preferred diets, where heaviest dogs presented lower intakes as did the Beagle breed in relation with both Boxer and Labrador Retrievers. Moreover, the hot season of the year decreased dogs’ intake of preferred diets. In terms of preferences, Boxers presented a lower preference for selected diets compared to the other breeds. Finally, age and sex did not affect dogs’ preference or intake of the foods selected. The understanding of the relationships between food composition and intrinsic variables of dogs with their diet selection could improve specific pet food formulation in order to satisfy animals’ physiological and hedonic needs. ABSTRACT: A ten-year food preference database (2007–2017) was used to relate food selection in dogs to the nutritional components of diets by doing a principal component analysis (PCA) and a linear regression between components obtained and dogs’ preferences. Intake and preference of preferred diets were analyzed by dogs’ sex, breed, age, body weight, and the season of the year (hot or cold). The fourth component after PCA presented a relation with food preferences (OR = −2.699, p = 0.026), showing negative correlations with crude fiber (rho = −0.196; P = 0.038) and dry matter (rho = −0.184; p = 0.049). Weight (OR = −1.35; p < 0.001), breed, both Boxer (OR = 10.62; p = 0.003) and Labrador Retriever (OR = 26.30; p < 0.001), and season (hot season) (OR = −5.27; p < 0.001) all influenced animals’ intake. Boxers presented a lower food preference compared to the other breeds (OR = −44.3; p < 0.001), while animals’ weight influenced preferences only in Boxers (OR = 2.02; p < 0.001). Finally, age and sex did not affect dogs’ preference or intake of preferred diets. Thus dry matter and fiber content have a negative impact on dogs’ food choices. Dogs’ weight, breed, and season affected food intake, but only breed affected dogs’ preferences, which is probably explained by adaptive changes in the detection, metabolization, and learning of nutritive food cues. MDPI 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6562821/ /pubmed/31064159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9050219 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alegría-Morán, Raúl A.
Guzmán-Pino, Sergio A.
Egaña, Juan Ignacio
Muñoz, Carem
Figueroa, Jaime
Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection
title Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection
title_full Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection
title_fullStr Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection
title_full_unstemmed Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection
title_short Food Preferences in Dogs: Effect of Dietary Composition and Intrinsic Variables on Diet Selection
title_sort food preferences in dogs: effect of dietary composition and intrinsic variables on diet selection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6562821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9050219
work_keys_str_mv AT alegriamoranraula foodpreferencesindogseffectofdietarycompositionandintrinsicvariablesondietselection
AT guzmanpinosergioa foodpreferencesindogseffectofdietarycompositionandintrinsicvariablesondietselection
AT eganajuanignacio foodpreferencesindogseffectofdietarycompositionandintrinsicvariablesondietselection
AT munozcarem foodpreferencesindogseffectofdietarycompositionandintrinsicvariablesondietselection
AT figueroajaime foodpreferencesindogseffectofdietarycompositionandintrinsicvariablesondietselection