Cargando…

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations (PCE) are widely used and advocated in guidelines for predicting 10-year risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. Over the past few decades, these models have been ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Damen, Johanna A., Pajouheshnia, Romin, Heus, Pauline, Moons, Karel G. M., Reitsma, Johannes B., Scholten, Rob J. P. M., Hooft, Lotty, Debray, Thomas P. A.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6563379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31189462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1340-7

Ejemplares similares

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
por: Debray, Thomas PA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Accounting for treatment use when validating a prognostic model: a simulation study
por: Pajouheshnia, Romin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Treatment use in prognostic model research: a systematic review of cardiovascular prognostic studies
por: Pajouheshnia, Romin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
por: Damen, Johanna A.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Re-estimation improved the performance of two Framingham cardiovascular risk equations and the Pooled Cohort equations: A nationwide registry analysis
por: Wallisch, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols
por: van der Braak, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical trial registration was associated with lower risk of bias compared with non-registered trials among trials included in systematic reviews
por: Lindsley, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Publisher Correction: Re-estimation improved the performance of two Framingham cardiovascular risk equations and the Pooled Cohort equations: A nationwide registry analysis
por: Wallisch, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative performance of pooled cohort equations and Framingham risk scores in cardiovascular disease risk classification in a slum setting in Nairobi Kenya
por: Wekesah, Frederick M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Small-study effects and time trends in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, Wynanda Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

What did we learn in 35 years of research on nutrition and supplements for age‐related macular degeneration: a systematic review
por: Pameijer, Els M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
por: Damen, Johanna A. A. G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling Studies: Guidance on Their Use
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Identification of Additional Trials in Prospective Trial Registers for Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: van Enst, Wynanda A., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Data sources and methods used to determine pretest probabilities in a cohort of Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
por: Oerbekke, Michiel S., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement
por: Vinkers, Christiaan H., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
por: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Framingham risk prediction equations for incidence of cardiovascular disease using detailed measures for smoking
por: Mannan, Haider, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Comparison of Framingham risk score and pooled cohort equations for the prediction of coronary atherosclerosis in patients who meet the target LDL-C level of Korean dyslipidemia guideline
por: Kim, Su Bin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
por: Verkerk, Eva W, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Invited Commentary: Treatment Drop-in—Making the Case for Causal Prediction
por: Sperrin, Matthew, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Developing more generalizable prediction models from pooled studies and large clustered data sets
por: de Jong, Valentijn M. T., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
por: Ochodo, Eleanor A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: A Comparison of the Framingham, PROCAM, and DAD Equations in HIV-Infected Persons
por: Nery, Max Weyler, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Developing and validating risk prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis
por: Ahmed, Ikhlaaq, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications
por: van de Wetering, Fleur T., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Barriers and facilitators to reduce low-value care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
por: van Dulmen, SA, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology
por: Debray, Thomas P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease by the Framingham‐REGICOR Equation in the High‐Risk PREDIMED Cohort: Impact of the Mediterranean Diet Across Different Risk Strata
por: Amor, Antonio J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Performance of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine and the Framingham Risk Equations in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease in the EPIC- Norfolk Cohort
por: Simmons, Rebecca K., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies
por: Naaktgeboren, Christiana A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_f44rtd47ect6abtvb866o4v890