Cargando…

Motion corrected water/fat whole‐heart coronary MR angiography with 100% respiratory efficiency

PURPOSE: To develop a framework for respiratory motion‐corrected 3D whole‐heart water/fat coronary MR angiography (CMRA) at 3T with reduced and predictable scan time. METHODS: A 3D dual‐echo acquisition and respiratory motion‐corrected reconstruction framework for water/fat CMRA imaging was develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munoz, Camila, Cruz, Gastão, Neji, Radhouene, Botnar, Rene M., Prieto, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6563440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27732
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To develop a framework for respiratory motion‐corrected 3D whole‐heart water/fat coronary MR angiography (CMRA) at 3T with reduced and predictable scan time. METHODS: A 3D dual‐echo acquisition and respiratory motion‐corrected reconstruction framework for water/fat CMRA imaging was developed. The acquisition sequence integrates a 2D dual‐echo image navigator (iNAV), enabling 100% respiratory scan efficiency. Respiratory motion estimated from both the 2D iNAVs and the 3D data itself is used to produce nonrigid motion‐corrected water/fat CMRA images. A first study to investigate which iNAV (water, fat, in‐phase or out‐of‐phase) provides the best translational motion estimation was performed in 10 healthy subjects. Subsequently, nonrigid motion‐corrected water/fat images were compared to a diaphragmatic navigator gated and tracked water/fat CMRA acquisition. Image quality metrics included visible vessel length and vessel sharpness for both the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries. RESULTS: Average vessel sharpness achieved with water, fat, in‐phase and out‐of‐phase iNAVs was 33.8%, 29.6%, 32.2%, and 38.5%, respectively. Out‐of‐phase iNAVs were therefore used for estimating translational respiratory motion for the remainder of the study. No statistically significant differences in vessel length and sharpness (P > 0.01) were observed between the proposed nonrigid motion correction approach and the reference images, although data acquisition was significantly shorter (P < 2.6×10(–4)). Motion correction improved vessel sharpness by 60.4% and vessel length by 47.7%, on average, in water CMRA images in comparison with no motion correction. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of a novel motion‐corrected water/fat CMRA approach has been demonstrated at 3T, producing images comparable to a reference gated acquisition, but in a shorter and predictable scan time.