Cargando…

Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Doubt is subjective uncertainty about one’s perceptions and recall. It can impair decision-making and is a prominent feature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We propose that evaluation of doubt during decision-making provides a useful endophenotype with which to study the underlying pathophys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marton, Tanya, Samuels, Jack, Nestadt, Paul, Krasnow, Janice, Wang, Ying, Shuler, Marshall, Kamath, Vidyulata, Chib, Vikram S., Bakker, Arnold, Nestadt, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6564001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218182
_version_ 1783426635749392384
author Marton, Tanya
Samuels, Jack
Nestadt, Paul
Krasnow, Janice
Wang, Ying
Shuler, Marshall
Kamath, Vidyulata
Chib, Vikram S.
Bakker, Arnold
Nestadt, Gerald
author_facet Marton, Tanya
Samuels, Jack
Nestadt, Paul
Krasnow, Janice
Wang, Ying
Shuler, Marshall
Kamath, Vidyulata
Chib, Vikram S.
Bakker, Arnold
Nestadt, Gerald
author_sort Marton, Tanya
collection PubMed
description Doubt is subjective uncertainty about one’s perceptions and recall. It can impair decision-making and is a prominent feature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We propose that evaluation of doubt during decision-making provides a useful endophenotype with which to study the underlying pathophysiology of OCD and potentially other psychopathologies. For the current study, we developed a new instrument, the Doubt Questionnaire, to clinically assess doubt. The random dot motion task was used to measure reaction time and subjective certainty, at varying levels of perceptual difficulty, in individuals who scored high and low on doubt, and in individuals with and without OCD. We found that doubt scores were significantly higher in OCD cases than controls. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that high doubt scores predicted slower evidence accumulation than did low doubt scores; and OCD diagnosis lower than controls. At higher levels of dot coherence, OCD participants exhibited significantly slower drift rates than did controls (q<0.05 for 30%, and 45% coherence; q<0.01 for 70% coherence). In addition, at higher levels of coherence, high doubt subjects exhibited even slower drift rates and reaction times than low doubt subjects (q<0.01 for 70% coherence). Moreover, under high coherence conditions, individuals with high doubt scores reported lower certainty in their decisions than did those with low doubt scores. We conclude that the Doubt Questionnaire is a useful instrument for measuring doubt. Compared to those with low doubt, those with high doubt accumulate evidence more slowly and report lower certainty when making decisions under conditions of low uncertainty. High doubt may affect the decision-making process in individuals with OCD. The dimensional doubt measure is a useful endophenotype for OCD research and could enable computationally rigorous and neurally valid understanding of decision-making and its pathological expression in OCD and other disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6564001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65640012019-06-20 Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder Marton, Tanya Samuels, Jack Nestadt, Paul Krasnow, Janice Wang, Ying Shuler, Marshall Kamath, Vidyulata Chib, Vikram S. Bakker, Arnold Nestadt, Gerald PLoS One Research Article Doubt is subjective uncertainty about one’s perceptions and recall. It can impair decision-making and is a prominent feature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We propose that evaluation of doubt during decision-making provides a useful endophenotype with which to study the underlying pathophysiology of OCD and potentially other psychopathologies. For the current study, we developed a new instrument, the Doubt Questionnaire, to clinically assess doubt. The random dot motion task was used to measure reaction time and subjective certainty, at varying levels of perceptual difficulty, in individuals who scored high and low on doubt, and in individuals with and without OCD. We found that doubt scores were significantly higher in OCD cases than controls. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that high doubt scores predicted slower evidence accumulation than did low doubt scores; and OCD diagnosis lower than controls. At higher levels of dot coherence, OCD participants exhibited significantly slower drift rates than did controls (q<0.05 for 30%, and 45% coherence; q<0.01 for 70% coherence). In addition, at higher levels of coherence, high doubt subjects exhibited even slower drift rates and reaction times than low doubt subjects (q<0.01 for 70% coherence). Moreover, under high coherence conditions, individuals with high doubt scores reported lower certainty in their decisions than did those with low doubt scores. We conclude that the Doubt Questionnaire is a useful instrument for measuring doubt. Compared to those with low doubt, those with high doubt accumulate evidence more slowly and report lower certainty when making decisions under conditions of low uncertainty. High doubt may affect the decision-making process in individuals with OCD. The dimensional doubt measure is a useful endophenotype for OCD research and could enable computationally rigorous and neurally valid understanding of decision-making and its pathological expression in OCD and other disorders. Public Library of Science 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6564001/ /pubmed/31194808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218182 Text en © 2019 Marton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marton, Tanya
Samuels, Jack
Nestadt, Paul
Krasnow, Janice
Wang, Ying
Shuler, Marshall
Kamath, Vidyulata
Chib, Vikram S.
Bakker, Arnold
Nestadt, Gerald
Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_full Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_fullStr Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_short Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_sort validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: a proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6564001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218182
work_keys_str_mv AT martontanya validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT samuelsjack validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT nestadtpaul validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT krasnowjanice validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT wangying validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT shulermarshall validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT kamathvidyulata validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT chibvikrams validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT bakkerarnold validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT nestadtgerald validatingadimensionofdoubtindecisionmakingaproposedendophenotypeforobsessivecompulsivedisorder