Cargando…

Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system

The Laban Movement Analysis system (LMA) is a widely used system for the description of human movement. Here we present results of an empirical analysis of the reliability of the LMA system. Firstly, we developed a directed graph-based representation for the formalization of LMA. Secondly, we implem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernardet, Ulysses, Fdili Alaoui, Sarah, Studd, Karen, Bradley, Karen, Pasquier, Philippe, Schiphorst, Thecla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6564005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218179
_version_ 1783426636682625024
author Bernardet, Ulysses
Fdili Alaoui, Sarah
Studd, Karen
Bradley, Karen
Pasquier, Philippe
Schiphorst, Thecla
author_facet Bernardet, Ulysses
Fdili Alaoui, Sarah
Studd, Karen
Bradley, Karen
Pasquier, Philippe
Schiphorst, Thecla
author_sort Bernardet, Ulysses
collection PubMed
description The Laban Movement Analysis system (LMA) is a widely used system for the description of human movement. Here we present results of an empirical analysis of the reliability of the LMA system. Firstly, we developed a directed graph-based representation for the formalization of LMA. Secondly, we implemented a custom video annotation tool for stimulus presentation and annotation of the formalized LMA. Using these two elements, we conducted an experimental assessment of LMA reliability. In the experimental assessment of the reliability, experts–Certified Movement Analysts (CMA)–were tasked with identifying the differences between a “neutral” movement and the same movement executed with a specific variation in one of the dimensions of the LMA parameter space. The videos represented variations on the pantomimed movement of knocking at a door or giving directions. To be as close as possible to the annotation practice of CMAs, participants were given full control over the number of times and order in which they viewed the videos. The LMA annotation was captured by means of the video annotation tool that guided the participants through the LMA graph by asking them multiple-choice questions at each node. Participants were asked to first annotate the most salient difference (round 1), and then the second most salient one (round 2) between a neutral and gesture and the variation. To quantify the overall reliability of LMA, we computed Krippendorff’s α. The quantitative data shows that the reliability, depending on how the two rounds are integrated, ranges between a weak and an acceptable reliability of LMA. The analysis of viewing behavior showed that, despite relatively large differences at the inter-individual level, there is no simple relationship between viewing behavior and individual performance (quantified as the level of agreement of the individual with the dominant rating). This research advances the state of the art in formalizing and implementing a reliability measure for the Laban Movement Analysis system. The experimental study we conducted allows identifying some of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely used movement coding system. Additionally, we have gained useful insights into the assessment procedure itself.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6564005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65640052019-06-20 Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system Bernardet, Ulysses Fdili Alaoui, Sarah Studd, Karen Bradley, Karen Pasquier, Philippe Schiphorst, Thecla PLoS One Research Article The Laban Movement Analysis system (LMA) is a widely used system for the description of human movement. Here we present results of an empirical analysis of the reliability of the LMA system. Firstly, we developed a directed graph-based representation for the formalization of LMA. Secondly, we implemented a custom video annotation tool for stimulus presentation and annotation of the formalized LMA. Using these two elements, we conducted an experimental assessment of LMA reliability. In the experimental assessment of the reliability, experts–Certified Movement Analysts (CMA)–were tasked with identifying the differences between a “neutral” movement and the same movement executed with a specific variation in one of the dimensions of the LMA parameter space. The videos represented variations on the pantomimed movement of knocking at a door or giving directions. To be as close as possible to the annotation practice of CMAs, participants were given full control over the number of times and order in which they viewed the videos. The LMA annotation was captured by means of the video annotation tool that guided the participants through the LMA graph by asking them multiple-choice questions at each node. Participants were asked to first annotate the most salient difference (round 1), and then the second most salient one (round 2) between a neutral and gesture and the variation. To quantify the overall reliability of LMA, we computed Krippendorff’s α. The quantitative data shows that the reliability, depending on how the two rounds are integrated, ranges between a weak and an acceptable reliability of LMA. The analysis of viewing behavior showed that, despite relatively large differences at the inter-individual level, there is no simple relationship between viewing behavior and individual performance (quantified as the level of agreement of the individual with the dominant rating). This research advances the state of the art in formalizing and implementing a reliability measure for the Laban Movement Analysis system. The experimental study we conducted allows identifying some of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely used movement coding system. Additionally, we have gained useful insights into the assessment procedure itself. Public Library of Science 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6564005/ /pubmed/31194794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218179 Text en © 2019 Bernardet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bernardet, Ulysses
Fdili Alaoui, Sarah
Studd, Karen
Bradley, Karen
Pasquier, Philippe
Schiphorst, Thecla
Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system
title Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system
title_full Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system
title_fullStr Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system
title_short Assessing the reliability of the Laban Movement Analysis system
title_sort assessing the reliability of the laban movement analysis system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6564005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218179
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardetulysses assessingthereliabilityofthelabanmovementanalysissystem
AT fdilialaouisarah assessingthereliabilityofthelabanmovementanalysissystem
AT studdkaren assessingthereliabilityofthelabanmovementanalysissystem
AT bradleykaren assessingthereliabilityofthelabanmovementanalysissystem
AT pasquierphilippe assessingthereliabilityofthelabanmovementanalysissystem
AT schiphorstthecla assessingthereliabilityofthelabanmovementanalysissystem