Cargando…
A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems
Technology evolution describes a change in a technology performance over time. The modeling of technology evolution is crucial for designers, entrepreneurs, and government officials to set reasonable R&D targets, invest in promising technology, and develop effective incentive policies. Scientist...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6564689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218370 |
_version_ | 1783426652981690368 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Guanglu Allaire, Douglas Shankar, Venkatesh McAdams, Daniel A. |
author_facet | Zhang, Guanglu Allaire, Douglas Shankar, Venkatesh McAdams, Daniel A. |
author_sort | Zhang, Guanglu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Technology evolution describes a change in a technology performance over time. The modeling of technology evolution is crucial for designers, entrepreneurs, and government officials to set reasonable R&D targets, invest in promising technology, and develop effective incentive policies. Scientists and engineers have developed several mathematical functions such as logistic function and exponential function (Moore’s Law) to model technology evolution. However, these models focus on how a technology evolves in isolation and do not consider how the technology interacts with other technologies. Here, we extend the Lotka-Volterra equations from community ecology to model a technology ecosystem with system, component, and fundamental layers. We model the technology ecosystem of passenger aircraft using the Lotka-Volterra equations. The results show limited trickle-down effect in the technology ecosystem, where we refer to the impact from an upper layer technology to a lower layer technology as a trickle-down effect. The limited trickle-down effect suggests that the advance of the system technology (passenger aircraft) is not able to automatically promote the performance of the component technology (turbofan aero-engine) and the fundamental technology (engine blade superalloy) that constitute the system. Our research warns that it may not be effective to maintain the prosperity of a technology ecosystem through government incentives on system technologies only. Decision makers should consider supporting the innovations of key component or fundamental technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6564689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65646892019-06-20 A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems Zhang, Guanglu Allaire, Douglas Shankar, Venkatesh McAdams, Daniel A. PLoS One Research Article Technology evolution describes a change in a technology performance over time. The modeling of technology evolution is crucial for designers, entrepreneurs, and government officials to set reasonable R&D targets, invest in promising technology, and develop effective incentive policies. Scientists and engineers have developed several mathematical functions such as logistic function and exponential function (Moore’s Law) to model technology evolution. However, these models focus on how a technology evolves in isolation and do not consider how the technology interacts with other technologies. Here, we extend the Lotka-Volterra equations from community ecology to model a technology ecosystem with system, component, and fundamental layers. We model the technology ecosystem of passenger aircraft using the Lotka-Volterra equations. The results show limited trickle-down effect in the technology ecosystem, where we refer to the impact from an upper layer technology to a lower layer technology as a trickle-down effect. The limited trickle-down effect suggests that the advance of the system technology (passenger aircraft) is not able to automatically promote the performance of the component technology (turbofan aero-engine) and the fundamental technology (engine blade superalloy) that constitute the system. Our research warns that it may not be effective to maintain the prosperity of a technology ecosystem through government incentives on system technologies only. Decision makers should consider supporting the innovations of key component or fundamental technologies. Public Library of Science 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6564689/ /pubmed/31194826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218370 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Guanglu Allaire, Douglas Shankar, Venkatesh McAdams, Daniel A. A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems |
title | A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems |
title_full | A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems |
title_fullStr | A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems |
title_full_unstemmed | A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems |
title_short | A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems |
title_sort | case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6564689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangguanglu acaseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems AT allairedouglas acaseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems AT shankarvenkatesh acaseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems AT mcadamsdaniela acaseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems AT zhangguanglu caseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems AT allairedouglas caseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems AT shankarvenkatesh caseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems AT mcadamsdaniela caseagainstthetrickledowneffectintechnologyecosystems |