Cargando…
Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws()
OBJECTIVE: Posterior pelvic lesions, especially of the sacral-iliac joint, have high mortality and morbidity risks. Definitive fixation is necessary for the joint stabilization, and one option is the sacral percutaneous pinning with screws. Proximity to important structures to this region brings ris...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6565950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2013.04.006 |
_version_ | 1783426751826755584 |
---|---|
author | Cruz, Henrique Alves Angelis, Gustavo Platzeck de |
author_facet | Cruz, Henrique Alves Angelis, Gustavo Platzeck de |
author_sort | Cruz, Henrique Alves |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Posterior pelvic lesions, especially of the sacral-iliac joint, have high mortality and morbidity risks. Definitive fixation is necessary for the joint stabilization, and one option is the sacral percutaneous pinning with screws. Proximity to important structures to this region brings risks to the fixation procedure; therefore, it is important to know the tridimensional anatomy of the pelvis posterior region. Deviations of the surgeon's hand of four degrees may target the screws to those structures; dimorphisms of the upper sacrum and a poor lesion reduction may redound in a screw malpositioning. This study is aimed to evaluate the dimensions of a safe surgical corridor for safe sacroiliac screw insertion and relations with age and sex of the patients. METHOD: One hundred randomly selected pelvis CTs of patients with no pelvic diseases, seen at a tertiary care teaching Hospital. Measurements were made by computer and the safest area for screw insertion was calculated by two methods. The results were expressed in mm (not in degrees), in order to be a further surgical reference. RESULTS: There was a significant size difference in the analyzed sacral vertebra, differing on a wider size in men than in women. There was no significant statistical difference between vertebral size and age. By both methods, a safe area for screw insertion could be defined. CONCLUSION: Age does not influence the width of the surgical corridor. The surgeon has a safe corridor considered narrower when inserting screws in a female pelvis than when in a male one. However, as the smallest vertebra found (feminine) was considered for statics, it was concluded that this corridor is 20 mm wide in any direction, taking as a reference the centrum of the vertebra. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6565950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65659502019-07-12 Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() Cruz, Henrique Alves Angelis, Gustavo Platzeck de Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: Posterior pelvic lesions, especially of the sacral-iliac joint, have high mortality and morbidity risks. Definitive fixation is necessary for the joint stabilization, and one option is the sacral percutaneous pinning with screws. Proximity to important structures to this region brings risks to the fixation procedure; therefore, it is important to know the tridimensional anatomy of the pelvis posterior region. Deviations of the surgeon's hand of four degrees may target the screws to those structures; dimorphisms of the upper sacrum and a poor lesion reduction may redound in a screw malpositioning. This study is aimed to evaluate the dimensions of a safe surgical corridor for safe sacroiliac screw insertion and relations with age and sex of the patients. METHOD: One hundred randomly selected pelvis CTs of patients with no pelvic diseases, seen at a tertiary care teaching Hospital. Measurements were made by computer and the safest area for screw insertion was calculated by two methods. The results were expressed in mm (not in degrees), in order to be a further surgical reference. RESULTS: There was a significant size difference in the analyzed sacral vertebra, differing on a wider size in men than in women. There was no significant statistical difference between vertebral size and age. By both methods, a safe area for screw insertion could be defined. CONCLUSION: Age does not influence the width of the surgical corridor. The surgeon has a safe corridor considered narrower when inserting screws in a female pelvis than when in a male one. However, as the smallest vertebra found (feminine) was considered for statics, it was concluded that this corridor is 20 mm wide in any direction, taking as a reference the centrum of the vertebra. Elsevier 2013-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6565950/ /pubmed/31304132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2013.04.006 Text en © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cruz, Henrique Alves Angelis, Gustavo Platzeck de Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() |
title | Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() |
title_full | Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() |
title_fullStr | Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() |
title_full_unstemmed | Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() |
title_short | Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() |
title_sort | sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6565950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2013.04.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cruzhenriquealves sacroiliacsecurecorridoranalysisforsafeinsertionofiliosacralscrews AT angelisgustavoplatzeckde sacroiliacsecurecorridoranalysisforsafeinsertionofiliosacralscrews |