Cargando…

Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?()

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a safe distal femoral resection angle to restore the normal axial alignment of the limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the Brazilian geriatric population with knee arthrosis. METHOD: This study analyzed 99 pre-operative hip-knee-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rezende, Fernando Cury, de Castro Ferreira, Márcio, Debieux, Pedro, da Silveira Franciozi, Carlos Eduardo, Luzo, Marcus Vinicius Malheiros, Carneiro, Mário
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6565951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2012.08.009
_version_ 1783426752057442304
author Rezende, Fernando Cury
de Castro Ferreira, Márcio
Debieux, Pedro
da Silveira Franciozi, Carlos Eduardo
Luzo, Marcus Vinicius Malheiros
Carneiro, Mário
author_facet Rezende, Fernando Cury
de Castro Ferreira, Márcio
Debieux, Pedro
da Silveira Franciozi, Carlos Eduardo
Luzo, Marcus Vinicius Malheiros
Carneiro, Mário
author_sort Rezende, Fernando Cury
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a safe distal femoral resection angle to restore the normal axial alignment of the limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the Brazilian geriatric population with knee arthrosis. METHOD: This study analyzed 99 pre-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs of osteoarthritic knees of 66 patients (54 women, 12 men) with knee osteoarthritis. The distal femoral cut angle was determined based on the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMA). Mean, median and standard deviation measurements of the distal femoral cut angle were calculated, differentiated by gender and side. The mean result of the distal femoral resection angle was compared to 5.7°, the mean average angle of previous and similar study based on European population of patients with knee arthrosis. RESULTS: The mean average of the distal femoral resection angle of the study was 6.05 (range 3–9°). The distribution of this angle between genders showed a slight superior average of the male population (6.17°) compared to the female (6.02°), but with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.726). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.052) between the mean average of this study (6.05°) compared to the mean average of the literature (5.7°). However, considering 3° as the limit of acceptable error in the coronal plane, this empirical femoral resection angle would not be appropriated for 19.7% of the population. CONCLUSION: The distal femoral resection angle of 5–6° is not completely safe for the Brazilian geriatric population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6565951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65659512019-07-12 Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?() Rezende, Fernando Cury de Castro Ferreira, Márcio Debieux, Pedro da Silveira Franciozi, Carlos Eduardo Luzo, Marcus Vinicius Malheiros Carneiro, Mário Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a safe distal femoral resection angle to restore the normal axial alignment of the limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the Brazilian geriatric population with knee arthrosis. METHOD: This study analyzed 99 pre-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs of osteoarthritic knees of 66 patients (54 women, 12 men) with knee osteoarthritis. The distal femoral cut angle was determined based on the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle (FMA). Mean, median and standard deviation measurements of the distal femoral cut angle were calculated, differentiated by gender and side. The mean result of the distal femoral resection angle was compared to 5.7°, the mean average angle of previous and similar study based on European population of patients with knee arthrosis. RESULTS: The mean average of the distal femoral resection angle of the study was 6.05 (range 3–9°). The distribution of this angle between genders showed a slight superior average of the male population (6.17°) compared to the female (6.02°), but with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.726). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.052) between the mean average of this study (6.05°) compared to the mean average of the literature (5.7°). However, considering 3° as the limit of acceptable error in the coronal plane, this empirical femoral resection angle would not be appropriated for 19.7% of the population. CONCLUSION: The distal femoral resection angle of 5–6° is not completely safe for the Brazilian geriatric population. Elsevier 2013-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6565951/ /pubmed/31304146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2012.08.009 Text en © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Rezende, Fernando Cury
de Castro Ferreira, Márcio
Debieux, Pedro
da Silveira Franciozi, Carlos Eduardo
Luzo, Marcus Vinicius Malheiros
Carneiro, Mário
Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?()
title Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?()
title_full Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?()
title_fullStr Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?()
title_full_unstemmed Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?()
title_short Is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the Brazilian geriatric population?()
title_sort is it safe the empirical distal femoral resection angle of 5° to 6° of valgus in the brazilian geriatric population?()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6565951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2012.08.009
work_keys_str_mv AT rezendefernandocury isitsafetheempiricaldistalfemoralresectionangleof5to6ofvalgusinthebraziliangeriatricpopulation
AT decastroferreiramarcio isitsafetheempiricaldistalfemoralresectionangleof5to6ofvalgusinthebraziliangeriatricpopulation
AT debieuxpedro isitsafetheempiricaldistalfemoralresectionangleof5to6ofvalgusinthebraziliangeriatricpopulation
AT dasilveirafranciozicarloseduardo isitsafetheempiricaldistalfemoralresectionangleof5to6ofvalgusinthebraziliangeriatricpopulation
AT luzomarcusviniciusmalheiros isitsafetheempiricaldistalfemoralresectionangleof5to6ofvalgusinthebraziliangeriatricpopulation
AT carneiromario isitsafetheempiricaldistalfemoralresectionangleof5to6ofvalgusinthebraziliangeriatricpopulation