Cargando…

Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation

Nanotechnologies have been increasingly used in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors, including construction, transportation, energy, and healthcare. The widespread application of these technologies has raised concerns regarding their environmental, health, societal,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isigonis, Panagiotis, Hristozov, Danail, Benighaus, Christina, Giubilato, Elisa, Grieger, Khara, Pizzol, Lisa, Semenzin, Elena, Linkov, Igor, Zabeo, Alex, Marcomini, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9050696
_version_ 1783426834505924608
author Isigonis, Panagiotis
Hristozov, Danail
Benighaus, Christina
Giubilato, Elisa
Grieger, Khara
Pizzol, Lisa
Semenzin, Elena
Linkov, Igor
Zabeo, Alex
Marcomini, Antonio
author_facet Isigonis, Panagiotis
Hristozov, Danail
Benighaus, Christina
Giubilato, Elisa
Grieger, Khara
Pizzol, Lisa
Semenzin, Elena
Linkov, Igor
Zabeo, Alex
Marcomini, Antonio
author_sort Isigonis, Panagiotis
collection PubMed
description Nanotechnologies have been increasingly used in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors, including construction, transportation, energy, and healthcare. The widespread application of these technologies has raised concerns regarding their environmental, health, societal, and economic impacts. This has led to the investment of enormous resources in Europe and beyond into the development of tools to facilitate the risk assessment and management of nanomaterials, and to inform more robust risk governance process. In this context, several risk governance frameworks have been developed. In our study, we present and review those, and identify a set of criteria and tools for risk evaluation, mitigation, and communication, the implementation of which can inform better risk management decision-making by various stakeholders from e.g., industry, regulators, and the civil society. Based on our analysis, we recommend specific methods from decision science and information technologies that can improve the existing risk governance tools so that they can communicate, evaluate, and mitigate risks more transparently, taking stakeholder perspectives and expert opinion into account, and considering all relevant criteria in establishing the risk-benefit balance of these emerging technologies to enable more robust decisions about the governance of their risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6566360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65663602019-06-17 Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation Isigonis, Panagiotis Hristozov, Danail Benighaus, Christina Giubilato, Elisa Grieger, Khara Pizzol, Lisa Semenzin, Elena Linkov, Igor Zabeo, Alex Marcomini, Antonio Nanomaterials (Basel) Article Nanotechnologies have been increasingly used in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors, including construction, transportation, energy, and healthcare. The widespread application of these technologies has raised concerns regarding their environmental, health, societal, and economic impacts. This has led to the investment of enormous resources in Europe and beyond into the development of tools to facilitate the risk assessment and management of nanomaterials, and to inform more robust risk governance process. In this context, several risk governance frameworks have been developed. In our study, we present and review those, and identify a set of criteria and tools for risk evaluation, mitigation, and communication, the implementation of which can inform better risk management decision-making by various stakeholders from e.g., industry, regulators, and the civil society. Based on our analysis, we recommend specific methods from decision science and information technologies that can improve the existing risk governance tools so that they can communicate, evaluate, and mitigate risks more transparently, taking stakeholder perspectives and expert opinion into account, and considering all relevant criteria in establishing the risk-benefit balance of these emerging technologies to enable more robust decisions about the governance of their risks. MDPI 2019-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6566360/ /pubmed/31060250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9050696 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Isigonis, Panagiotis
Hristozov, Danail
Benighaus, Christina
Giubilato, Elisa
Grieger, Khara
Pizzol, Lisa
Semenzin, Elena
Linkov, Igor
Zabeo, Alex
Marcomini, Antonio
Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
title Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
title_full Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
title_fullStr Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
title_full_unstemmed Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
title_short Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
title_sort risk governance of nanomaterials: review of criteria and tools for risk communication, evaluation, and mitigation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9050696
work_keys_str_mv AT isigonispanagiotis riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT hristozovdanail riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT benighauschristina riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT giubilatoelisa riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT griegerkhara riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT pizzollisa riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT semenzinelena riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT linkovigor riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT zabeoalex riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation
AT marcominiantonio riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation