Cargando…
Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
Nanotechnologies have been increasingly used in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors, including construction, transportation, energy, and healthcare. The widespread application of these technologies has raised concerns regarding their environmental, health, societal,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9050696 |
_version_ | 1783426834505924608 |
---|---|
author | Isigonis, Panagiotis Hristozov, Danail Benighaus, Christina Giubilato, Elisa Grieger, Khara Pizzol, Lisa Semenzin, Elena Linkov, Igor Zabeo, Alex Marcomini, Antonio |
author_facet | Isigonis, Panagiotis Hristozov, Danail Benighaus, Christina Giubilato, Elisa Grieger, Khara Pizzol, Lisa Semenzin, Elena Linkov, Igor Zabeo, Alex Marcomini, Antonio |
author_sort | Isigonis, Panagiotis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nanotechnologies have been increasingly used in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors, including construction, transportation, energy, and healthcare. The widespread application of these technologies has raised concerns regarding their environmental, health, societal, and economic impacts. This has led to the investment of enormous resources in Europe and beyond into the development of tools to facilitate the risk assessment and management of nanomaterials, and to inform more robust risk governance process. In this context, several risk governance frameworks have been developed. In our study, we present and review those, and identify a set of criteria and tools for risk evaluation, mitigation, and communication, the implementation of which can inform better risk management decision-making by various stakeholders from e.g., industry, regulators, and the civil society. Based on our analysis, we recommend specific methods from decision science and information technologies that can improve the existing risk governance tools so that they can communicate, evaluate, and mitigate risks more transparently, taking stakeholder perspectives and expert opinion into account, and considering all relevant criteria in establishing the risk-benefit balance of these emerging technologies to enable more robust decisions about the governance of their risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6566360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65663602019-06-17 Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation Isigonis, Panagiotis Hristozov, Danail Benighaus, Christina Giubilato, Elisa Grieger, Khara Pizzol, Lisa Semenzin, Elena Linkov, Igor Zabeo, Alex Marcomini, Antonio Nanomaterials (Basel) Article Nanotechnologies have been increasingly used in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors, including construction, transportation, energy, and healthcare. The widespread application of these technologies has raised concerns regarding their environmental, health, societal, and economic impacts. This has led to the investment of enormous resources in Europe and beyond into the development of tools to facilitate the risk assessment and management of nanomaterials, and to inform more robust risk governance process. In this context, several risk governance frameworks have been developed. In our study, we present and review those, and identify a set of criteria and tools for risk evaluation, mitigation, and communication, the implementation of which can inform better risk management decision-making by various stakeholders from e.g., industry, regulators, and the civil society. Based on our analysis, we recommend specific methods from decision science and information technologies that can improve the existing risk governance tools so that they can communicate, evaluate, and mitigate risks more transparently, taking stakeholder perspectives and expert opinion into account, and considering all relevant criteria in establishing the risk-benefit balance of these emerging technologies to enable more robust decisions about the governance of their risks. MDPI 2019-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6566360/ /pubmed/31060250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9050696 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Isigonis, Panagiotis Hristozov, Danail Benighaus, Christina Giubilato, Elisa Grieger, Khara Pizzol, Lisa Semenzin, Elena Linkov, Igor Zabeo, Alex Marcomini, Antonio Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation |
title | Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation |
title_full | Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation |
title_fullStr | Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation |
title_short | Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation |
title_sort | risk governance of nanomaterials: review of criteria and tools for risk communication, evaluation, and mitigation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano9050696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isigonispanagiotis riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT hristozovdanail riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT benighauschristina riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT giubilatoelisa riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT griegerkhara riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT pizzollisa riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT semenzinelena riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT linkovigor riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT zabeoalex riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation AT marcominiantonio riskgovernanceofnanomaterialsreviewofcriteriaandtoolsforriskcommunicationevaluationandmitigation |