Cargando…

A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy

The flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy is studied experimentally by the compression tests in the range of the strain rates from 0.0001 to 0.1 s(−1) and temperature from 293 to 413 K. Based on the experimental data, three constitutive models including the Johnson–Cook (J–C), modified Zerilli–Armstrong...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Tongyang, Zhao, Bin, Lu, Xiqun, Xu, Hanzhang, Zou, Dequan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12101726
_version_ 1783426871988322304
author Li, Tongyang
Zhao, Bin
Lu, Xiqun
Xu, Hanzhang
Zou, Dequan
author_facet Li, Tongyang
Zhao, Bin
Lu, Xiqun
Xu, Hanzhang
Zou, Dequan
author_sort Li, Tongyang
collection PubMed
description The flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy is studied experimentally by the compression tests in the range of the strain rates from 0.0001 to 0.1 s(−1) and temperature from 293 to 413 K. Based on the experimental data, three constitutive models including the Johnson–Cook (J–C), modified Zerilli–Armstrong (Z–A), and Arrhenius-type (A-type) models are compared to find out an optimum model to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy. The results show that the J–C model could predict the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy accurately only at some specific strain rates and temperature near the reference values. The modified Z–A and A-type constitutive models can give better fitting results than the J–C model. While, at high strains, the predictive values of the modified Z–A model have larger errors than those at low strains, which means this model has limitations at high strains. By comparison, the A-type model could predict the experimental results accurately at the whole strain range, which indicates that it is a more suitable choice to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy in the focused range of strain rates and temperatures. The work is beneficial to solve the tribological problem of the bearing of the marine engine by integrating the accurate constitutive model into the corresponding numerical model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6566525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65665252019-06-17 A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy Li, Tongyang Zhao, Bin Lu, Xiqun Xu, Hanzhang Zou, Dequan Materials (Basel) Article The flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy is studied experimentally by the compression tests in the range of the strain rates from 0.0001 to 0.1 s(−1) and temperature from 293 to 413 K. Based on the experimental data, three constitutive models including the Johnson–Cook (J–C), modified Zerilli–Armstrong (Z–A), and Arrhenius-type (A-type) models are compared to find out an optimum model to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy. The results show that the J–C model could predict the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy accurately only at some specific strain rates and temperature near the reference values. The modified Z–A and A-type constitutive models can give better fitting results than the J–C model. While, at high strains, the predictive values of the modified Z–A model have larger errors than those at low strains, which means this model has limitations at high strains. By comparison, the A-type model could predict the experimental results accurately at the whole strain range, which indicates that it is a more suitable choice to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy in the focused range of strain rates and temperatures. The work is beneficial to solve the tribological problem of the bearing of the marine engine by integrating the accurate constitutive model into the corresponding numerical model. MDPI 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6566525/ /pubmed/31137885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12101726 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Tongyang
Zhao, Bin
Lu, Xiqun
Xu, Hanzhang
Zou, Dequan
A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy
title A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy
title_full A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy
title_short A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy
title_sort comparative study on johnson cook, modified zerilli–armstrong, and arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict compression flow behavior of snsbcu alloy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12101726
work_keys_str_mv AT litongyang acomparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT zhaobin acomparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT luxiqun acomparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT xuhanzhang acomparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT zoudequan acomparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT litongyang comparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT zhaobin comparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT luxiqun comparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT xuhanzhang comparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy
AT zoudequan comparativestudyonjohnsoncookmodifiedzerilliarmstrongandarrheniustypeconstitutivemodelstopredictcompressionflowbehaviorofsnsbcualloy