Cargando…

Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients

Background. Epidemiological studies have suggested a survival benefit for hemodialysis patients on paricalcitol or calcitriol, but nutritional vitamin D supplementation of patients already on vitamin D receptor (VDR) activators is controversial. Methods. This observational retrospective cohort study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villa-Bellosta, Ricardo, Mahillo-Fernández, Ignacio, Ortíz, Alberto, González-Parra, Emilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035488
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11050959
_version_ 1783426889530998784
author Villa-Bellosta, Ricardo
Mahillo-Fernández, Ignacio
Ortíz, Alberto
González-Parra, Emilio
author_facet Villa-Bellosta, Ricardo
Mahillo-Fernández, Ignacio
Ortíz, Alberto
González-Parra, Emilio
author_sort Villa-Bellosta, Ricardo
collection PubMed
description Background. Epidemiological studies have suggested a survival benefit for hemodialysis patients on paricalcitol or calcitriol, but nutritional vitamin D supplementation of patients already on vitamin D receptor (VDR) activators is controversial. Methods. This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted with prospectively collected data from all consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who underwent hemodialysis under routine clinical practice conditions for two years. Results. Of the 129 patients, 89 were treated with calcidiol, paricalcitol, and/or calcitriol. The patients with any vitamin D formulation had higher serum concentrations of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and fibroblast growth factor-23 and tended to have higher mortality rates (42% vs. 25%, p = 0.07). On subgroup analysis, any calcidiol treatment or calcidiol combined with paricalcitol associated with significantly higher mortality rates than no treatment (47% and 62.5%, p = 0.043 and 0.008, respectively). The association between calcidiol/paricalcitol treatment and elevated mortality remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, C-reactive protein, and hemodialysis vintage. Any calcidiol and calcidiol/paricalcitol treatment exhibited a dose-response relationship with mortality (p for trend: 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). Conclusions. These data draw attention to the hitherto unexplored safety of calcidiol supplementation in patients on hemodialysis, especially in those already on vitamin D. Until clinical trials demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this approach, caution should be exercised when prescribing these patients ≥0.5 calcidiol mg/month.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6566618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65666182019-06-17 Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients Villa-Bellosta, Ricardo Mahillo-Fernández, Ignacio Ortíz, Alberto González-Parra, Emilio Nutrients Article Background. Epidemiological studies have suggested a survival benefit for hemodialysis patients on paricalcitol or calcitriol, but nutritional vitamin D supplementation of patients already on vitamin D receptor (VDR) activators is controversial. Methods. This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted with prospectively collected data from all consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who underwent hemodialysis under routine clinical practice conditions for two years. Results. Of the 129 patients, 89 were treated with calcidiol, paricalcitol, and/or calcitriol. The patients with any vitamin D formulation had higher serum concentrations of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and fibroblast growth factor-23 and tended to have higher mortality rates (42% vs. 25%, p = 0.07). On subgroup analysis, any calcidiol treatment or calcidiol combined with paricalcitol associated with significantly higher mortality rates than no treatment (47% and 62.5%, p = 0.043 and 0.008, respectively). The association between calcidiol/paricalcitol treatment and elevated mortality remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, C-reactive protein, and hemodialysis vintage. Any calcidiol and calcidiol/paricalcitol treatment exhibited a dose-response relationship with mortality (p for trend: 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). Conclusions. These data draw attention to the hitherto unexplored safety of calcidiol supplementation in patients on hemodialysis, especially in those already on vitamin D. Until clinical trials demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this approach, caution should be exercised when prescribing these patients ≥0.5 calcidiol mg/month. MDPI 2019-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6566618/ /pubmed/31035488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11050959 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Villa-Bellosta, Ricardo
Mahillo-Fernández, Ignacio
Ortíz, Alberto
González-Parra, Emilio
Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients
title Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients
title_full Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients
title_fullStr Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients
title_short Questioning the Safety of Calcidiol in Hemodialysis Patients
title_sort questioning the safety of calcidiol in hemodialysis patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035488
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11050959
work_keys_str_mv AT villabellostaricardo questioningthesafetyofcalcidiolinhemodialysispatients
AT mahillofernandezignacio questioningthesafetyofcalcidiolinhemodialysispatients
AT ortizalberto questioningthesafetyofcalcidiolinhemodialysispatients
AT gonzalezparraemilio questioningthesafetyofcalcidiolinhemodialysispatients