Cargando…

Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review

Wearable motion tracking sensors are now widely used to monitor physical activity, and have recently gained more attention in dietary monitoring research. The aim of this review is to synthesise research to date that utilises upper limb motion tracking sensors, either individually or in combination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heydarian, Hamid, Adam, Marc, Burrows, Tracy, Collins, Clare, Rollo, Megan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11051168
_version_ 1783426958947778560
author Heydarian, Hamid
Adam, Marc
Burrows, Tracy
Collins, Clare
Rollo, Megan E.
author_facet Heydarian, Hamid
Adam, Marc
Burrows, Tracy
Collins, Clare
Rollo, Megan E.
author_sort Heydarian, Hamid
collection PubMed
description Wearable motion tracking sensors are now widely used to monitor physical activity, and have recently gained more attention in dietary monitoring research. The aim of this review is to synthesise research to date that utilises upper limb motion tracking sensors, either individually or in combination with other technologies (e.g., cameras, microphones), to objectively assess eating behaviour. Eleven electronic databases were searched in January 2019, and 653 distinct records were obtained. Including 10 studies found in backward and forward searches, a total of 69 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 28 published since 2017. Fifty studies were conducted exclusively in laboratory settings, 13 exclusively in free-living settings, and three in both settings. The most commonly used motion sensor was an accelerometer (64) worn on the wrist (60) or lower arm (5), while in most studies (45), accelerometers were used in combination with gyroscopes. Twenty-six studies used commercial-grade smartwatches or fitness bands, 11 used professional grade devices, and 32 used standalone sensor chipsets. The most used machine learning approaches were Support Vector Machine (SVM, n = 21), Random Forest (n = 19), Decision Tree (n = 16), Hidden Markov Model (HMM, n = 10) algorithms, and from 2017 Deep Learning (n = 5). While comparisons of the detection models are not valid due to the use of different datasets, the models that consider the sequential context of data across time, such as HMM and Deep Learning, show promising results for eating activity detection. We discuss opportunities for future research and emerging applications in the context of dietary assessment and monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6566929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65669292019-06-17 Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review Heydarian, Hamid Adam, Marc Burrows, Tracy Collins, Clare Rollo, Megan E. Nutrients Review Wearable motion tracking sensors are now widely used to monitor physical activity, and have recently gained more attention in dietary monitoring research. The aim of this review is to synthesise research to date that utilises upper limb motion tracking sensors, either individually or in combination with other technologies (e.g., cameras, microphones), to objectively assess eating behaviour. Eleven electronic databases were searched in January 2019, and 653 distinct records were obtained. Including 10 studies found in backward and forward searches, a total of 69 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 28 published since 2017. Fifty studies were conducted exclusively in laboratory settings, 13 exclusively in free-living settings, and three in both settings. The most commonly used motion sensor was an accelerometer (64) worn on the wrist (60) or lower arm (5), while in most studies (45), accelerometers were used in combination with gyroscopes. Twenty-six studies used commercial-grade smartwatches or fitness bands, 11 used professional grade devices, and 32 used standalone sensor chipsets. The most used machine learning approaches were Support Vector Machine (SVM, n = 21), Random Forest (n = 19), Decision Tree (n = 16), Hidden Markov Model (HMM, n = 10) algorithms, and from 2017 Deep Learning (n = 5). While comparisons of the detection models are not valid due to the use of different datasets, the models that consider the sequential context of data across time, such as HMM and Deep Learning, show promising results for eating activity detection. We discuss opportunities for future research and emerging applications in the context of dietary assessment and monitoring. MDPI 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6566929/ /pubmed/31137677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11051168 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Heydarian, Hamid
Adam, Marc
Burrows, Tracy
Collins, Clare
Rollo, Megan E.
Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review
title Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review
title_full Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review
title_short Assessing Eating Behaviour Using Upper Limb Mounted Motion Sensors: A Systematic Review
title_sort assessing eating behaviour using upper limb mounted motion sensors: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6566929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11051168
work_keys_str_mv AT heydarianhamid assessingeatingbehaviourusingupperlimbmountedmotionsensorsasystematicreview
AT adammarc assessingeatingbehaviourusingupperlimbmountedmotionsensorsasystematicreview
AT burrowstracy assessingeatingbehaviourusingupperlimbmountedmotionsensorsasystematicreview
AT collinsclare assessingeatingbehaviourusingupperlimbmountedmotionsensorsasystematicreview
AT rollomegane assessingeatingbehaviourusingupperlimbmountedmotionsensorsasystematicreview