Cargando…

“You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia

BACKGROUND: Increased global urbanisation has led to public health challenges. Community gardens are identified as a mechanism for addressing socio-ecological determinants of health. This study aims to explore motives for joining community gardens, and the extent to which participation can be facili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kingsley, Jonathan, Foenander, Emily, Bailey, Aisling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3
_version_ 1783427065873170432
author Kingsley, Jonathan
Foenander, Emily
Bailey, Aisling
author_facet Kingsley, Jonathan
Foenander, Emily
Bailey, Aisling
author_sort Kingsley, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increased global urbanisation has led to public health challenges. Community gardens are identified as a mechanism for addressing socio-ecological determinants of health. This study aims to explore motives for joining community gardens, and the extent to which participation can be facilitated given barriers and enablers to community gardening. Such a study fills a gap in the public health literature, particularly in the Australian context. METHODS: This paper presents findings from semi-structured interviews with 23 participants from 6 community gardens across Melbourne. Applying phenomenological, epistemological and reflexive methodologies and thematic analysis of the data, this study provides a snapshot of drivers of community garden participation. RESULTS: Results were categorised into six enabling themes to participation. These themes revolved around (i) family history, childhood and passion for gardening; (ii) productive gardening, sustainability and growing fresh produce in nature; (iii) building social and community connections; (iv) community and civic action; (v) stress relief; and (vi) building identity, pride and purpose. Time costs incurred, garden governance and vandalism of garden spaces were among the barriers to community garden participation. CONCLUSION: Although an interest in the act of gardening itself may be universally present among community gardeners to varying degrees, the findings of this study suggest that motivations for participation are diverse and span a range of ancestral, social, environmental, and political domains. This study contributes exploratory insights on community garden motivations and sustained involvement across multiple urban sites in Melbourne (Australia). This study recommends extending this work by undertaking future quantitative research that can move from local case studies to a national guidelines on how to engage more people in urban agriculture activities like community gardening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65673882019-06-17 “You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia Kingsley, Jonathan Foenander, Emily Bailey, Aisling BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Increased global urbanisation has led to public health challenges. Community gardens are identified as a mechanism for addressing socio-ecological determinants of health. This study aims to explore motives for joining community gardens, and the extent to which participation can be facilitated given barriers and enablers to community gardening. Such a study fills a gap in the public health literature, particularly in the Australian context. METHODS: This paper presents findings from semi-structured interviews with 23 participants from 6 community gardens across Melbourne. Applying phenomenological, epistemological and reflexive methodologies and thematic analysis of the data, this study provides a snapshot of drivers of community garden participation. RESULTS: Results were categorised into six enabling themes to participation. These themes revolved around (i) family history, childhood and passion for gardening; (ii) productive gardening, sustainability and growing fresh produce in nature; (iii) building social and community connections; (iv) community and civic action; (v) stress relief; and (vi) building identity, pride and purpose. Time costs incurred, garden governance and vandalism of garden spaces were among the barriers to community garden participation. CONCLUSION: Although an interest in the act of gardening itself may be universally present among community gardeners to varying degrees, the findings of this study suggest that motivations for participation are diverse and span a range of ancestral, social, environmental, and political domains. This study contributes exploratory insights on community garden motivations and sustained involvement across multiple urban sites in Melbourne (Australia). This study recommends extending this work by undertaking future quantitative research that can move from local case studies to a national guidelines on how to engage more people in urban agriculture activities like community gardening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567388/ /pubmed/31196077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kingsley, Jonathan
Foenander, Emily
Bailey, Aisling
“You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia
title “You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia
title_full “You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia
title_fullStr “You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia
title_full_unstemmed “You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia
title_short “You feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in Melbourne, Australia
title_sort “you feel like you’re part of something bigger”: exploring motivations for community garden participation in melbourne, australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7108-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kingsleyjonathan youfeellikeyourepartofsomethingbiggerexploringmotivationsforcommunitygardenparticipationinmelbourneaustralia
AT foenanderemily youfeellikeyourepartofsomethingbiggerexploringmotivationsforcommunitygardenparticipationinmelbourneaustralia
AT baileyaisling youfeellikeyourepartofsomethingbiggerexploringmotivationsforcommunitygardenparticipationinmelbourneaustralia