Cargando…
Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
BACKGROUND: Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2 |
_version_ | 1783427076315938816 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Mengxing Zhou, Yingfeng Zhong, Jie Wang, Kairong Ding, Yan Li, Li |
author_facet | Zhang, Mengxing Zhou, Yingfeng Zhong, Jie Wang, Kairong Ding, Yan Li, Li |
author_sort | Zhang, Mengxing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aims to analyze and evaluate the contents of all available guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes. METHOD: Relevant clinical guidelines were collected through a search of relevant guideline websites and databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, etc.). Fourteen guidelines were identified, and each guideline was assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Two independent reviewers extracted guideline recommendations using a “recommendation matrix” through which basic guideline information and consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen documents were analyzed, and a total of 361 original recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management were assessed. In all guidelines included, the recommendations were developed in five domains, namely, diagnosis of GDM, prenatal care, intrapartum care, neonatal care and postpartum care. Different guidelines appeared to have significant discrepancy in consistency of guideline content, but overall, there was consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations (scilicet 49.31, 57.20 and 58.17%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although commonality in most recommendations existed, there were still some discrepancies between guidelines. Consistency of guidelines on the management of GDM in pregnancy is highly variable and needs to be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6567433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65674332019-06-17 Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal Zhang, Mengxing Zhou, Yingfeng Zhong, Jie Wang, Kairong Ding, Yan Li, Li BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aims to analyze and evaluate the contents of all available guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes. METHOD: Relevant clinical guidelines were collected through a search of relevant guideline websites and databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, etc.). Fourteen guidelines were identified, and each guideline was assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Two independent reviewers extracted guideline recommendations using a “recommendation matrix” through which basic guideline information and consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen documents were analyzed, and a total of 361 original recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management were assessed. In all guidelines included, the recommendations were developed in five domains, namely, diagnosis of GDM, prenatal care, intrapartum care, neonatal care and postpartum care. Different guidelines appeared to have significant discrepancy in consistency of guideline content, but overall, there was consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations (scilicet 49.31, 57.20 and 58.17%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although commonality in most recommendations existed, there were still some discrepancies between guidelines. Consistency of guidelines on the management of GDM in pregnancy is highly variable and needs to be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567433/ /pubmed/31196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Mengxing Zhou, Yingfeng Zhong, Jie Wang, Kairong Ding, Yan Li, Li Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal |
title | Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal |
title_full | Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal |
title_fullStr | Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal |
title_full_unstemmed | Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal |
title_short | Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal |
title_sort | current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangmengxing currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal AT zhouyingfeng currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal AT zhongjie currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal AT wangkairong currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal AT dingyan currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal AT lili currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal |