Cargando…

Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal

BACKGROUND: Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Mengxing, Zhou, Yingfeng, Zhong, Jie, Wang, Kairong, Ding, Yan, Li, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2
_version_ 1783427076315938816
author Zhang, Mengxing
Zhou, Yingfeng
Zhong, Jie
Wang, Kairong
Ding, Yan
Li, Li
author_facet Zhang, Mengxing
Zhou, Yingfeng
Zhong, Jie
Wang, Kairong
Ding, Yan
Li, Li
author_sort Zhang, Mengxing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aims to analyze and evaluate the contents of all available guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes. METHOD: Relevant clinical guidelines were collected through a search of relevant guideline websites and databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, etc.). Fourteen guidelines were identified, and each guideline was assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Two independent reviewers extracted guideline recommendations using a “recommendation matrix” through which basic guideline information and consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen documents were analyzed, and a total of 361 original recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management were assessed. In all guidelines included, the recommendations were developed in five domains, namely, diagnosis of GDM, prenatal care, intrapartum care, neonatal care and postpartum care. Different guidelines appeared to have significant discrepancy in consistency of guideline content, but overall, there was consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations (scilicet 49.31, 57.20 and 58.17%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although commonality in most recommendations existed, there were still some discrepancies between guidelines. Consistency of guidelines on the management of GDM in pregnancy is highly variable and needs to be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65674332019-06-17 Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal Zhang, Mengxing Zhou, Yingfeng Zhong, Jie Wang, Kairong Ding, Yan Li, Li BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aims to analyze and evaluate the contents of all available guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes. METHOD: Relevant clinical guidelines were collected through a search of relevant guideline websites and databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, etc.). Fourteen guidelines were identified, and each guideline was assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Two independent reviewers extracted guideline recommendations using a “recommendation matrix” through which basic guideline information and consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen documents were analyzed, and a total of 361 original recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management were assessed. In all guidelines included, the recommendations were developed in five domains, namely, diagnosis of GDM, prenatal care, intrapartum care, neonatal care and postpartum care. Different guidelines appeared to have significant discrepancy in consistency of guideline content, but overall, there was consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations (scilicet 49.31, 57.20 and 58.17%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although commonality in most recommendations existed, there were still some discrepancies between guidelines. Consistency of guidelines on the management of GDM in pregnancy is highly variable and needs to be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567433/ /pubmed/31196116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Mengxing
Zhou, Yingfeng
Zhong, Jie
Wang, Kairong
Ding, Yan
Li, Li
Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
title Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
title_full Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
title_fullStr Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
title_full_unstemmed Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
title_short Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
title_sort current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2343-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangmengxing currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal
AT zhouyingfeng currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal
AT zhongjie currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal
AT wangkairong currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal
AT dingyan currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal
AT lili currentguidelinesonthemanagementofgestationaldiabetesmellitusacontentanalysisandappraisal