Cargando…

Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs

The enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) expressing F4 and F18 fimbriae are the two main pathogens associated with post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) in piglets. The growing global concern regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has encouraged research into the development of nutritional and feeding st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luise, Diana, Lauridsen, Charlotte, Bosi, Paolo, Trevisi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0352-7
_version_ 1783427086667481088
author Luise, Diana
Lauridsen, Charlotte
Bosi, Paolo
Trevisi, Paolo
author_facet Luise, Diana
Lauridsen, Charlotte
Bosi, Paolo
Trevisi, Paolo
author_sort Luise, Diana
collection PubMed
description The enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) expressing F4 and F18 fimbriae are the two main pathogens associated with post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) in piglets. The growing global concern regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has encouraged research into the development of nutritional and feeding strategies as well as vaccination protocols in order to counteract the PWD due to ETEC. A valid approach to researching effective strategies is to implement piglet in vivo challenge models with ETEC infection. Thus, the proper application and standardization of ETEC F4 and F18 challenge models represent an urgent priority. The current review provides an overview regarding the current piglet ETEC F4 and F18 challenge models; it highlights the key points for setting the challenge protocols and the most important indicators which should be included in research studies to verify the effectiveness of the ETEC challenge. Based on the current review, it is recommended that the setting of the model correctly assesses the choice and preconditioning of pigs, and the timing and dosage of the ETEC inoculation. Furthermore, the evaluation of the ETEC challenge response should include both clinical parameters (such as the occurrence of diarrhea, rectal temperature and bacterial fecal shedding) and biomarkers for the specific expression of ETEC F4/F18 (such as antibody production, specific F4/F18 immunoglobulins (Igs), ETEC F4/F18 fecal enumeration and analysis of the F4/F18 receptors expression in the intestinal brush borders). On the basis of the review, the piglets’ response upon F4 or F18 inoculation differed in terms of the timing and intensity of the diarrhea development, on ETEC fecal shedding and in the piglets’ immunological antibody response. This information was considered to be relevant to correctly define the experimental protocol, the data recording and the sample collections. Appropriate challenge settings and evaluation of the response parameters will allow future research studies to comply with the replacement, reduction and refinement (3R) approach, and to be able to evaluate the efficiency of a given feeding, nutritional or vaccination intervention in order to combat ETEC infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65674772019-06-17 Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs Luise, Diana Lauridsen, Charlotte Bosi, Paolo Trevisi, Paolo J Anim Sci Biotechnol Review The enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) expressing F4 and F18 fimbriae are the two main pathogens associated with post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) in piglets. The growing global concern regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has encouraged research into the development of nutritional and feeding strategies as well as vaccination protocols in order to counteract the PWD due to ETEC. A valid approach to researching effective strategies is to implement piglet in vivo challenge models with ETEC infection. Thus, the proper application and standardization of ETEC F4 and F18 challenge models represent an urgent priority. The current review provides an overview regarding the current piglet ETEC F4 and F18 challenge models; it highlights the key points for setting the challenge protocols and the most important indicators which should be included in research studies to verify the effectiveness of the ETEC challenge. Based on the current review, it is recommended that the setting of the model correctly assesses the choice and preconditioning of pigs, and the timing and dosage of the ETEC inoculation. Furthermore, the evaluation of the ETEC challenge response should include both clinical parameters (such as the occurrence of diarrhea, rectal temperature and bacterial fecal shedding) and biomarkers for the specific expression of ETEC F4/F18 (such as antibody production, specific F4/F18 immunoglobulins (Igs), ETEC F4/F18 fecal enumeration and analysis of the F4/F18 receptors expression in the intestinal brush borders). On the basis of the review, the piglets’ response upon F4 or F18 inoculation differed in terms of the timing and intensity of the diarrhea development, on ETEC fecal shedding and in the piglets’ immunological antibody response. This information was considered to be relevant to correctly define the experimental protocol, the data recording and the sample collections. Appropriate challenge settings and evaluation of the response parameters will allow future research studies to comply with the replacement, reduction and refinement (3R) approach, and to be able to evaluate the efficiency of a given feeding, nutritional or vaccination intervention in order to combat ETEC infection. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567477/ /pubmed/31210932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0352-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Luise, Diana
Lauridsen, Charlotte
Bosi, Paolo
Trevisi, Paolo
Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
title Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
title_full Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
title_fullStr Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
title_full_unstemmed Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
title_short Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
title_sort methodology and application of escherichia coli f4 and f18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0352-7
work_keys_str_mv AT luisediana methodologyandapplicationofescherichiacolif4andf18encodinginfectionmodelsinpostweaningpigs
AT lauridsencharlotte methodologyandapplicationofescherichiacolif4andf18encodinginfectionmodelsinpostweaningpigs
AT bosipaolo methodologyandapplicationofescherichiacolif4andf18encodinginfectionmodelsinpostweaningpigs
AT trevisipaolo methodologyandapplicationofescherichiacolif4andf18encodinginfectionmodelsinpostweaningpigs