Cargando…

International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units

BACKGROUND: Initiating parenteral nutrition (PN) within 24 h in critically ill children is inferior to withholding PN during the first week, as was found in the PEPaNIC study. The aims of this study were to investigate de-implementation of early initiation of PN at PICUs worldwide, and to identify f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Puffelen, Esther, Jacobs, An, Verdoorn, Charlotte J. M., Joosten, Koen F. M., van den Berghe, Greet, Ista, Erwin, Verbruggen, Sascha C. A. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4223-x
_version_ 1783427089221812224
author van Puffelen, Esther
Jacobs, An
Verdoorn, Charlotte J. M.
Joosten, Koen F. M.
van den Berghe, Greet
Ista, Erwin
Verbruggen, Sascha C. A. T.
author_facet van Puffelen, Esther
Jacobs, An
Verdoorn, Charlotte J. M.
Joosten, Koen F. M.
van den Berghe, Greet
Ista, Erwin
Verbruggen, Sascha C. A. T.
author_sort van Puffelen, Esther
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Initiating parenteral nutrition (PN) within 24 h in critically ill children is inferior to withholding PN during the first week, as was found in the PEPaNIC study. The aims of this study were to investigate de-implementation of early initiation of PN at PICUs worldwide, and to identify factors influencing de-implementation. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted (May – October 2017), consisting of 41 questions addressing current PN practices, the degree of de-implementation, and factors affecting de-implementation. RESULTS: We analysed 81 responses from 39 countries. Of these 81 respondents, 53 (65%) were aware of the findings of the PEPaNIC study, and 43 (53%) have read the article. In these 43 PICUs, PN was completely withheld during the first week in 10 PICUs, of which 5 already withheld PN (12%), and 5 de-implemented early initiation of PN (12%). Partial de-implementation was reported by 17 (40%) and no de-implementation by 16 (37%). Higher de-implementation rates were observed when the interpreted level of evidence and grade of recommendation of PEPaNIC was high. Predominant reasons for retaining early initiation of PN were concerns on withholding amino acids, the safety in undernourished children and neonates, and the long-term consequences. Furthermore, the respondents were waiting for updated guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: One year after the publication of the PEPaNIC trial, only two-thirds of the respondents was aware of the study results. Within this group, early initiation of PN was de-implemented completely in 12% of the PICUs, while 40% asserted partial de-implementation. Increasing the awareness, addressing the intervention-specific questions and more frequently revising international guidelines might help to accelerate de-implementation of ineffective, unproven or harmful healthcare. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4223-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65674882019-06-17 International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units van Puffelen, Esther Jacobs, An Verdoorn, Charlotte J. M. Joosten, Koen F. M. van den Berghe, Greet Ista, Erwin Verbruggen, Sascha C. A. T. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Initiating parenteral nutrition (PN) within 24 h in critically ill children is inferior to withholding PN during the first week, as was found in the PEPaNIC study. The aims of this study were to investigate de-implementation of early initiation of PN at PICUs worldwide, and to identify factors influencing de-implementation. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted (May – October 2017), consisting of 41 questions addressing current PN practices, the degree of de-implementation, and factors affecting de-implementation. RESULTS: We analysed 81 responses from 39 countries. Of these 81 respondents, 53 (65%) were aware of the findings of the PEPaNIC study, and 43 (53%) have read the article. In these 43 PICUs, PN was completely withheld during the first week in 10 PICUs, of which 5 already withheld PN (12%), and 5 de-implemented early initiation of PN (12%). Partial de-implementation was reported by 17 (40%) and no de-implementation by 16 (37%). Higher de-implementation rates were observed when the interpreted level of evidence and grade of recommendation of PEPaNIC was high. Predominant reasons for retaining early initiation of PN were concerns on withholding amino acids, the safety in undernourished children and neonates, and the long-term consequences. Furthermore, the respondents were waiting for updated guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: One year after the publication of the PEPaNIC trial, only two-thirds of the respondents was aware of the study results. Within this group, early initiation of PN was de-implemented completely in 12% of the PICUs, while 40% asserted partial de-implementation. Increasing the awareness, addressing the intervention-specific questions and more frequently revising international guidelines might help to accelerate de-implementation of ineffective, unproven or harmful healthcare. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4223-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567488/ /pubmed/31196076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4223-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Puffelen, Esther
Jacobs, An
Verdoorn, Charlotte J. M.
Joosten, Koen F. M.
van den Berghe, Greet
Ista, Erwin
Verbruggen, Sascha C. A. T.
International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units
title International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units
title_full International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units
title_fullStr International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units
title_short International survey of De-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in Paediatric intensive care units
title_sort international survey of de-implementation of initiating parenteral nutrition early in paediatric intensive care units
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4223-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpuffelenesther internationalsurveyofdeimplementationofinitiatingparenteralnutritionearlyinpaediatricintensivecareunits
AT jacobsan internationalsurveyofdeimplementationofinitiatingparenteralnutritionearlyinpaediatricintensivecareunits
AT verdoorncharlottejm internationalsurveyofdeimplementationofinitiatingparenteralnutritionearlyinpaediatricintensivecareunits
AT joostenkoenfm internationalsurveyofdeimplementationofinitiatingparenteralnutritionearlyinpaediatricintensivecareunits
AT vandenberghegreet internationalsurveyofdeimplementationofinitiatingparenteralnutritionearlyinpaediatricintensivecareunits
AT istaerwin internationalsurveyofdeimplementationofinitiatingparenteralnutritionearlyinpaediatricintensivecareunits
AT verbruggensaschacat internationalsurveyofdeimplementationofinitiatingparenteralnutritionearlyinpaediatricintensivecareunits