Cargando…

Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education

BACKGROUND: Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilmour-White, J. A., Picton, A., Blaikie, A., Denniston, A. K., Blanch, R., Coleman, J., Murray, P. I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1644-5
_version_ 1783427091102957568
author Gilmour-White, J. A.
Picton, A.
Blaikie, A.
Denniston, A. K.
Blanch, R.
Coleman, J.
Murray, P. I.
author_facet Gilmour-White, J. A.
Picton, A.
Blaikie, A.
Denniston, A. K.
Blanch, R.
Coleman, J.
Murray, P. I.
author_sort Gilmour-White, J. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usability. The Arclight ophthalmoscope (AO) is an easy to use, low-cost and portable device that could help address device access. This study aimed to assess the impact of personal ownership of an AO on DO skill acquisition and competency amongst medical students in the clinical environment. METHODS: Method comparison study with 42 medical students randomised to either traditional device ophthalmoscope (TDO) control or AO intervention group during an 18-week medical placement. Three objective assessments of DO competency were performed at the beginning and end of the placement: vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) measurement, fundus photo multiple-choice questions (F-MCQ) and model slide examination (MSE). DO examinations performed during the placement were recorded via an electronic logbook. RESULTS: Students in both groups recorded a median number of six examinations each during an eighteen-week placement. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any of the objective assessment measures (VCDR p = 0.561, MCQ p = 0.872, Model p = 0.772). Both groups demonstrated a minor improvement in VCDR measurement but a negative performance change in F-MCQ and MSE assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Students do not practice ophthalmoscopy often, even with constant access to their own portable device. The lack of significant difference between the groups suggests that device access alone is not the major factor affecting frequency of DO performance and consequent skill acquisition. Improving student engagement with ophthalmoscopy will require a more wide-ranging approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65674962019-06-17 Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education Gilmour-White, J. A. Picton, A. Blaikie, A. Denniston, A. K. Blanch, R. Coleman, J. Murray, P. I. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usability. The Arclight ophthalmoscope (AO) is an easy to use, low-cost and portable device that could help address device access. This study aimed to assess the impact of personal ownership of an AO on DO skill acquisition and competency amongst medical students in the clinical environment. METHODS: Method comparison study with 42 medical students randomised to either traditional device ophthalmoscope (TDO) control or AO intervention group during an 18-week medical placement. Three objective assessments of DO competency were performed at the beginning and end of the placement: vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) measurement, fundus photo multiple-choice questions (F-MCQ) and model slide examination (MSE). DO examinations performed during the placement were recorded via an electronic logbook. RESULTS: Students in both groups recorded a median number of six examinations each during an eighteen-week placement. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any of the objective assessment measures (VCDR p = 0.561, MCQ p = 0.872, Model p = 0.772). Both groups demonstrated a minor improvement in VCDR measurement but a negative performance change in F-MCQ and MSE assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Students do not practice ophthalmoscopy often, even with constant access to their own portable device. The lack of significant difference between the groups suggests that device access alone is not the major factor affecting frequency of DO performance and consequent skill acquisition. Improving student engagement with ophthalmoscopy will require a more wide-ranging approach. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567496/ /pubmed/31196068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1644-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gilmour-White, J. A.
Picton, A.
Blaikie, A.
Denniston, A. K.
Blanch, R.
Coleman, J.
Murray, P. I.
Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
title Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
title_full Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
title_fullStr Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
title_full_unstemmed Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
title_short Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
title_sort does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? a method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1644-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gilmourwhiteja doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT pictona doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT blaikiea doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT dennistonak doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT blanchr doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT colemanj doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT murraypi doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation