Cargando…
Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education
BACKGROUND: Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1644-5 |
_version_ | 1783427091102957568 |
---|---|
author | Gilmour-White, J. A. Picton, A. Blaikie, A. Denniston, A. K. Blanch, R. Coleman, J. Murray, P. I. |
author_facet | Gilmour-White, J. A. Picton, A. Blaikie, A. Denniston, A. K. Blanch, R. Coleman, J. Murray, P. I. |
author_sort | Gilmour-White, J. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usability. The Arclight ophthalmoscope (AO) is an easy to use, low-cost and portable device that could help address device access. This study aimed to assess the impact of personal ownership of an AO on DO skill acquisition and competency amongst medical students in the clinical environment. METHODS: Method comparison study with 42 medical students randomised to either traditional device ophthalmoscope (TDO) control or AO intervention group during an 18-week medical placement. Three objective assessments of DO competency were performed at the beginning and end of the placement: vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) measurement, fundus photo multiple-choice questions (F-MCQ) and model slide examination (MSE). DO examinations performed during the placement were recorded via an electronic logbook. RESULTS: Students in both groups recorded a median number of six examinations each during an eighteen-week placement. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any of the objective assessment measures (VCDR p = 0.561, MCQ p = 0.872, Model p = 0.772). Both groups demonstrated a minor improvement in VCDR measurement but a negative performance change in F-MCQ and MSE assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Students do not practice ophthalmoscopy often, even with constant access to their own portable device. The lack of significant difference between the groups suggests that device access alone is not the major factor affecting frequency of DO performance and consequent skill acquisition. Improving student engagement with ophthalmoscopy will require a more wide-ranging approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6567496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65674962019-06-17 Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education Gilmour-White, J. A. Picton, A. Blaikie, A. Denniston, A. K. Blanch, R. Coleman, J. Murray, P. I. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usability. The Arclight ophthalmoscope (AO) is an easy to use, low-cost and portable device that could help address device access. This study aimed to assess the impact of personal ownership of an AO on DO skill acquisition and competency amongst medical students in the clinical environment. METHODS: Method comparison study with 42 medical students randomised to either traditional device ophthalmoscope (TDO) control or AO intervention group during an 18-week medical placement. Three objective assessments of DO competency were performed at the beginning and end of the placement: vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) measurement, fundus photo multiple-choice questions (F-MCQ) and model slide examination (MSE). DO examinations performed during the placement were recorded via an electronic logbook. RESULTS: Students in both groups recorded a median number of six examinations each during an eighteen-week placement. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any of the objective assessment measures (VCDR p = 0.561, MCQ p = 0.872, Model p = 0.772). Both groups demonstrated a minor improvement in VCDR measurement but a negative performance change in F-MCQ and MSE assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Students do not practice ophthalmoscopy often, even with constant access to their own portable device. The lack of significant difference between the groups suggests that device access alone is not the major factor affecting frequency of DO performance and consequent skill acquisition. Improving student engagement with ophthalmoscopy will require a more wide-ranging approach. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567496/ /pubmed/31196068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1644-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gilmour-White, J. A. Picton, A. Blaikie, A. Denniston, A. K. Blanch, R. Coleman, J. Murray, P. I. Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education |
title | Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education |
title_full | Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education |
title_fullStr | Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education |
title_full_unstemmed | Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education |
title_short | Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education |
title_sort | does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? a method comparison study in undergraduate medical education |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1644-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilmourwhiteja doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT pictona doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT blaikiea doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT dennistonak doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT blanchr doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT colemanj doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation AT murraypi doesaccesstoaportableophthalmoscopeimproveskillacquisitionindirectophthalmoscopyamethodcomparisonstudyinundergraduatemedicaleducation |