Cargando…

Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal

BACKGROUND: From 2011 to 2014, an indoor residual spray (IRS) programme for malaria vectors control was implemented in six health districts in Senegal. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) sprayed on different wall surfaces and its impact o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo, Cheikh, Dia, Abdoulaye Kane, Dia, Ibrahima, Niang, El Hadji Amadou, Konaté, Lassana, Faye, Ousmane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2829-4
_version_ 1783427102312235008
author Lo, Cheikh
Dia, Abdoulaye Kane
Dia, Ibrahima
Niang, El Hadji Amadou
Konaté, Lassana
Faye, Ousmane
author_facet Lo, Cheikh
Dia, Abdoulaye Kane
Dia, Ibrahima
Niang, El Hadji Amadou
Konaté, Lassana
Faye, Ousmane
author_sort Lo, Cheikh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: From 2011 to 2014, an indoor residual spray (IRS) programme for malaria vectors control was implemented in six health districts in Senegal. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) sprayed on different wall surfaces and its impact on malaria vectors. The entomological monitoring activities were carried out monthly in five treated sentinel villages and one control untreated village in each district. METHODS: The residual efficacy of bendiocarb applied at a dosage of 0.4 g/sq m was monitored for a period up to 9 months post-IRS using WHO cone bioassay method. This assay consisted to expose 2–5 days old unfed susceptible Anopheles coluzzii females to sprayed walls for a period of 30 min. The mortality rates after 24 h post-exposure were estimated and compared between the different types of walls sprayed in each sentinel village. RESULTS: The results showed that the residual efficacy varied between the different sprayed walls, from one sentinel village to another and between the different campaigns. The FICAM had a residual efficacy of 3–6 months post-IRS on mud and cement wall surfaces. In some cases, the observed mortality rates were much higher than those reported elsewhere particularly during the first campaign in all the six districts. CONCLUSIONS: The FICAM was found to be effective with a residual efficacy varying from 3 to 6 months. If the quality of the IRS application is excluded as a possible explanation of the short efficacy duration, the results suggest at least two rounds of treatments in order to cover the rainy season that lasts 5 to 6 months in the area. Such treatments could be carried out before the intensification of the rains in July and August in order to better cover the transmission period that occurs between late August and October in the area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65675452019-06-17 Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal Lo, Cheikh Dia, Abdoulaye Kane Dia, Ibrahima Niang, El Hadji Amadou Konaté, Lassana Faye, Ousmane Malar J Research BACKGROUND: From 2011 to 2014, an indoor residual spray (IRS) programme for malaria vectors control was implemented in six health districts in Senegal. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) sprayed on different wall surfaces and its impact on malaria vectors. The entomological monitoring activities were carried out monthly in five treated sentinel villages and one control untreated village in each district. METHODS: The residual efficacy of bendiocarb applied at a dosage of 0.4 g/sq m was monitored for a period up to 9 months post-IRS using WHO cone bioassay method. This assay consisted to expose 2–5 days old unfed susceptible Anopheles coluzzii females to sprayed walls for a period of 30 min. The mortality rates after 24 h post-exposure were estimated and compared between the different types of walls sprayed in each sentinel village. RESULTS: The results showed that the residual efficacy varied between the different sprayed walls, from one sentinel village to another and between the different campaigns. The FICAM had a residual efficacy of 3–6 months post-IRS on mud and cement wall surfaces. In some cases, the observed mortality rates were much higher than those reported elsewhere particularly during the first campaign in all the six districts. CONCLUSIONS: The FICAM was found to be effective with a residual efficacy varying from 3 to 6 months. If the quality of the IRS application is excluded as a possible explanation of the short efficacy duration, the results suggest at least two rounds of treatments in order to cover the rainy season that lasts 5 to 6 months in the area. Such treatments could be carried out before the intensification of the rains in July and August in order to better cover the transmission period that occurs between late August and October in the area. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567545/ /pubmed/31196091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2829-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lo, Cheikh
Dia, Abdoulaye Kane
Dia, Ibrahima
Niang, El Hadji Amadou
Konaté, Lassana
Faye, Ousmane
Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal
title Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal
title_full Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal
title_fullStr Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal
title_short Evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in six health districts in Senegal
title_sort evaluation of the residual efficacy of indoor residual spraying with bendiocarb (ficam wp 80) in six health districts in senegal
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2829-4
work_keys_str_mv AT locheikh evaluationoftheresidualefficacyofindoorresidualsprayingwithbendiocarbficamwp80insixhealthdistrictsinsenegal
AT diaabdoulayekane evaluationoftheresidualefficacyofindoorresidualsprayingwithbendiocarbficamwp80insixhealthdistrictsinsenegal
AT diaibrahima evaluationoftheresidualefficacyofindoorresidualsprayingwithbendiocarbficamwp80insixhealthdistrictsinsenegal
AT niangelhadjiamadou evaluationoftheresidualefficacyofindoorresidualsprayingwithbendiocarbficamwp80insixhealthdistrictsinsenegal
AT konatelassana evaluationoftheresidualefficacyofindoorresidualsprayingwithbendiocarbficamwp80insixhealthdistrictsinsenegal
AT fayeousmane evaluationoftheresidualefficacyofindoorresidualsprayingwithbendiocarbficamwp80insixhealthdistrictsinsenegal