Cargando…

A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy

BACKGROUND: Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) have been reported to be at five to ten-fold risk (25 to 30 fold risk after solid organ transplant) of colorectal cancer (CRC) than the general population. Limited publications to date have reported on practical aspects of achieving adequate colonic clean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matson, A. G., Bunting, J. P., Kaul, A., Smith, D. J., Stonestreet, J., Herd, K., Hodgson, R. S., Bell, S. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-0979-z
_version_ 1783427109077647360
author Matson, A. G.
Bunting, J. P.
Kaul, A.
Smith, D. J.
Stonestreet, J.
Herd, K.
Hodgson, R. S.
Bell, S. C.
author_facet Matson, A. G.
Bunting, J. P.
Kaul, A.
Smith, D. J.
Stonestreet, J.
Herd, K.
Hodgson, R. S.
Bell, S. C.
author_sort Matson, A. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) have been reported to be at five to ten-fold risk (25 to 30 fold risk after solid organ transplant) of colorectal cancer (CRC) than the general population. Limited publications to date have reported on practical aspects of achieving adequate colonic cleanse producing good visualisation. In this study, we compared two bowel preparation regimens, standard bowel preparation and a modified CF bowel preparation. METHODS: A non-randomised study of adults with CF attending a single centre, requiring colonoscopy investigation were selected. Between 2001 and 2015, 485 adults with CF attended the clinic; 70 adults with CF had an initial colonoscopy procedure. After five exclusions, standard bowel preparation was prescribed for 27 patients, and modified CF bowel preparation for 38 patients. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all consenting patients. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between modified CF bowel preparation group and standard bowel preparation group in bowel visualisation outcomes, with the modified CF bowel preparation group having a higher proportion of “excellent/good” GI visualisation cleanse (50.0% versus 25.9%) and lower rates of “poor” visualisation cleanse (10.5% versus 44.5%) than standard bowel preparation (p = 0.006). Rates of “fair” GI cleanse visualisation were similar between the two groups (39.4% versus 29.6%) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Detection rates of adenomatous polyps at initial colonoscopy was higher in modified CF bowel preparation cohort than with standard preparation group (50.0% versus 18.5%, p < 0.01). Positive adenomatous polyp detection rate in patient’s age > 40 years of age was higher (62.5%) than those < 40 years of age (24.3%) (p = 0.003). Colonic adenocarcinoma diagnosis was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study primarily highlights that standard colonoscopy bowel preparation is often inadequate in patients with CF, and that colonic lavage using modified CF bowel preparation is required to obtain good colonic visualisation. A higher rate of polyps in patients over 40 years of age (versus less than 40 years) was evident. These results support adults with CF considered for colonoscopy screening at 40 years of age, or prior to this if symptomatic; which is earlier than CRC screening in the non-CF Australian population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-019-0979-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65675752019-06-17 A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy Matson, A. G. Bunting, J. P. Kaul, A. Smith, D. J. Stonestreet, J. Herd, K. Hodgson, R. S. Bell, S. C. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) have been reported to be at five to ten-fold risk (25 to 30 fold risk after solid organ transplant) of colorectal cancer (CRC) than the general population. Limited publications to date have reported on practical aspects of achieving adequate colonic cleanse producing good visualisation. In this study, we compared two bowel preparation regimens, standard bowel preparation and a modified CF bowel preparation. METHODS: A non-randomised study of adults with CF attending a single centre, requiring colonoscopy investigation were selected. Between 2001 and 2015, 485 adults with CF attended the clinic; 70 adults with CF had an initial colonoscopy procedure. After five exclusions, standard bowel preparation was prescribed for 27 patients, and modified CF bowel preparation for 38 patients. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all consenting patients. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between modified CF bowel preparation group and standard bowel preparation group in bowel visualisation outcomes, with the modified CF bowel preparation group having a higher proportion of “excellent/good” GI visualisation cleanse (50.0% versus 25.9%) and lower rates of “poor” visualisation cleanse (10.5% versus 44.5%) than standard bowel preparation (p = 0.006). Rates of “fair” GI cleanse visualisation were similar between the two groups (39.4% versus 29.6%) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Detection rates of adenomatous polyps at initial colonoscopy was higher in modified CF bowel preparation cohort than with standard preparation group (50.0% versus 18.5%, p < 0.01). Positive adenomatous polyp detection rate in patient’s age > 40 years of age was higher (62.5%) than those < 40 years of age (24.3%) (p = 0.003). Colonic adenocarcinoma diagnosis was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study primarily highlights that standard colonoscopy bowel preparation is often inadequate in patients with CF, and that colonic lavage using modified CF bowel preparation is required to obtain good colonic visualisation. A higher rate of polyps in patients over 40 years of age (versus less than 40 years) was evident. These results support adults with CF considered for colonoscopy screening at 40 years of age, or prior to this if symptomatic; which is earlier than CRC screening in the non-CF Australian population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-019-0979-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567575/ /pubmed/31195989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-0979-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matson, A. G.
Bunting, J. P.
Kaul, A.
Smith, D. J.
Stonestreet, J.
Herd, K.
Hodgson, R. S.
Bell, S. C.
A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy
title A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy
title_full A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy
title_fullStr A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy
title_short A non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy
title_sort non-randomised single centre cohort study, comparing standard and modified bowel preparations, in adults with cystic fibrosis requiring colonoscopy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-0979-z
work_keys_str_mv AT matsonag anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT buntingjp anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT kaula anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT smithdj anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT stonestreetj anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT herdk anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT hodgsonrs anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT bellsc anonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT matsonag nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT buntingjp nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT kaula nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT smithdj nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT stonestreetj nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT herdk nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT hodgsonrs nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy
AT bellsc nonrandomisedsinglecentrecohortstudycomparingstandardandmodifiedbowelpreparationsinadultswithcysticfibrosisrequiringcolonoscopy