Cargando…

Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches

BACKGROUND: Co-occurrence networks—ecological associations between sampled populations of microbial communities inferred from taxonomic composition data obtained from high-throughput sequencing techniques—are widely used in microbial ecology. Several co-occurrence network methods have been proposed....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirano, Hokuto, Takemoto, Kazuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2915-1
_version_ 1783427117340426240
author Hirano, Hokuto
Takemoto, Kazuhiro
author_facet Hirano, Hokuto
Takemoto, Kazuhiro
author_sort Hirano, Hokuto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Co-occurrence networks—ecological associations between sampled populations of microbial communities inferred from taxonomic composition data obtained from high-throughput sequencing techniques—are widely used in microbial ecology. Several co-occurrence network methods have been proposed. Co-occurrence network methods only infer ecological associations and are often used to discuss species interactions. However, validity of this application of co-occurrence network methods is currently debated. In particular, they simply evaluate using parametric statistical models, even though microbial compositions are determined through population dynamics. RESULTS: We comprehensively evaluated the validity of common methods for inferring microbial ecological networks through realistic simulations. We evaluated how correctly nine widely used methods describe interaction patterns in ecological communities. Contrary to previous studies, the performance of the co-occurrence network methods on compositional data was almost equal to or less than that of classical methods (e.g., Pearson’s correlation). The methods described the interaction patterns in dense and/or heterogeneous networks rather inadequately. Co-occurrence network performance also depended upon interaction types; specifically, the interaction patterns in competitive communities were relatively accurately predicted while those in predator–prey (parasitic) communities were relatively inadequately predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that co-occurrence network approaches may be insufficient in interpreting species interactions in microbiome studies. However, the results do not diminish the importance of these approaches. Rather, they highlight the need for further careful evaluation of the validity of these much-used methods and the development of more suitable methods for inferring microbial ecological networks. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-019-2915-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65676182019-06-27 Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches Hirano, Hokuto Takemoto, Kazuhiro BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Co-occurrence networks—ecological associations between sampled populations of microbial communities inferred from taxonomic composition data obtained from high-throughput sequencing techniques—are widely used in microbial ecology. Several co-occurrence network methods have been proposed. Co-occurrence network methods only infer ecological associations and are often used to discuss species interactions. However, validity of this application of co-occurrence network methods is currently debated. In particular, they simply evaluate using parametric statistical models, even though microbial compositions are determined through population dynamics. RESULTS: We comprehensively evaluated the validity of common methods for inferring microbial ecological networks through realistic simulations. We evaluated how correctly nine widely used methods describe interaction patterns in ecological communities. Contrary to previous studies, the performance of the co-occurrence network methods on compositional data was almost equal to or less than that of classical methods (e.g., Pearson’s correlation). The methods described the interaction patterns in dense and/or heterogeneous networks rather inadequately. Co-occurrence network performance also depended upon interaction types; specifically, the interaction patterns in competitive communities were relatively accurately predicted while those in predator–prey (parasitic) communities were relatively inadequately predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that co-occurrence network approaches may be insufficient in interpreting species interactions in microbiome studies. However, the results do not diminish the importance of these approaches. Rather, they highlight the need for further careful evaluation of the validity of these much-used methods and the development of more suitable methods for inferring microbial ecological networks. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-019-2915-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567618/ /pubmed/31195956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2915-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hirano, Hokuto
Takemoto, Kazuhiro
Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches
title Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches
title_full Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches
title_fullStr Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches
title_full_unstemmed Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches
title_short Difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches
title_sort difficulty in inferring microbial community structure based on co-occurrence network approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2915-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hiranohokuto difficultyininferringmicrobialcommunitystructurebasedoncooccurrencenetworkapproaches
AT takemotokazuhiro difficultyininferringmicrobialcommunitystructurebasedoncooccurrencenetworkapproaches