Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but the comparative risk of major bleeding varies between DOA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Kiran, Trocio, Jeffrey, Keshishian, Allison, Zhang, Qisu, Dina, Oluwaseyi, Mardekian, Jack, Nadkarni, Anagha, Shank, Thomas C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1
_version_ 1783427123173654528
author Gupta, Kiran
Trocio, Jeffrey
Keshishian, Allison
Zhang, Qisu
Dina, Oluwaseyi
Mardekian, Jack
Nadkarni, Anagha
Shank, Thomas C
author_facet Gupta, Kiran
Trocio, Jeffrey
Keshishian, Allison
Zhang, Qisu
Dina, Oluwaseyi
Mardekian, Jack
Nadkarni, Anagha
Shank, Thomas C
author_sort Gupta, Kiran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but the comparative risk of major bleeding varies between DOACs and warfarin. Using US Department of Defense (DOD) data, this study compared the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding for DOACs relative to warfarin. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 pharmacy claim for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from 01 Jan 2013–30 Sep 2015 were selected. Patients were required to have ≥1 medical claim for atrial fibrillation during the 12-month baseline period. Patients with a warfarin or DOAC claim during the 12-month baseline period were excluded. Each DOAC cohort was matched to the warfarin cohort using propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to evaluate the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs warfarin. RESULTS: Of 41,001 identified patients, there were 3691 dabigatran-warfarin, 8226 rivaroxaban-warfarin, and 7607 apixaban-warfarin matched patient pairs. Apixaban was the only DOAC found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39, 0.77; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.80; p < 0.001) compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban initiation were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE (dabigatran: HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.07; p = 0.096; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.09; p = 0.187) and major bleeding (dabigatran: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.40; p = 0.730; rivaroxaban: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.27; p = 0.423) compared to warfarin. CONCLUSION: Among NVAF patients in the US DOD population, apixaban was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65676432019-06-27 Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population Gupta, Kiran Trocio, Jeffrey Keshishian, Allison Zhang, Qisu Dina, Oluwaseyi Mardekian, Jack Nadkarni, Anagha Shank, Thomas C BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but the comparative risk of major bleeding varies between DOACs and warfarin. Using US Department of Defense (DOD) data, this study compared the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding for DOACs relative to warfarin. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 pharmacy claim for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from 01 Jan 2013–30 Sep 2015 were selected. Patients were required to have ≥1 medical claim for atrial fibrillation during the 12-month baseline period. Patients with a warfarin or DOAC claim during the 12-month baseline period were excluded. Each DOAC cohort was matched to the warfarin cohort using propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to evaluate the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs warfarin. RESULTS: Of 41,001 identified patients, there were 3691 dabigatran-warfarin, 8226 rivaroxaban-warfarin, and 7607 apixaban-warfarin matched patient pairs. Apixaban was the only DOAC found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39, 0.77; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.80; p < 0.001) compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban initiation were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE (dabigatran: HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.07; p = 0.096; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.09; p = 0.187) and major bleeding (dabigatran: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.40; p = 0.730; rivaroxaban: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.27; p = 0.423) compared to warfarin. CONCLUSION: Among NVAF patients in the US DOD population, apixaban was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567643/ /pubmed/31195999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gupta, Kiran
Trocio, Jeffrey
Keshishian, Allison
Zhang, Qisu
Dina, Oluwaseyi
Mardekian, Jack
Nadkarni, Anagha
Shank, Thomas C
Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population
title Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population
title_full Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population
title_short Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population
title_sort effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the us department of defense population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1
work_keys_str_mv AT guptakiran effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation
AT trociojeffrey effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation
AT keshishianallison effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation
AT zhangqisu effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation
AT dinaoluwaseyi effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation
AT mardekianjack effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation
AT nadkarnianagha effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation
AT shankthomasc effectivenessandsafetyofdirectoralanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarinintreatmentnaivenonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientsintheusdepartmentofdefensepopulation