Cargando…

“Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: Withdrawal of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) once disease remission is achieved is endorsed by current international rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management guidelines. However, very little data exists concerning patients’ views of this practice. In this qualitative study,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Kenneth F., Isaacs, John D., Thompson, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0070-y
_version_ 1783427126690578432
author Baker, Kenneth F.
Isaacs, John D.
Thompson, Ben
author_facet Baker, Kenneth F.
Isaacs, John D.
Thompson, Ben
author_sort Baker, Kenneth F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Withdrawal of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) once disease remission is achieved is endorsed by current international rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management guidelines. However, very little data exists concerning patients’ views of this practice. In this qualitative study, we aimed to explore patients’ perspectives on DMARD withdrawal in the setting of established RA. METHODS: In this qualitative interview study, patients with stable established RA were recruited from rheumatology outpatient clinics at a large UK teaching hospital. The perceived advantages and disadvantages of DMARDs and views on DMARD withdrawal were explored in semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analysed using standard qualitative techniques to construct an analytical framework. RESULTS: Thirteen participants (8 female, median [IQR] age 65 [61–73]) expressed their views of DMARD treatment in the context of their “normal lives”. For some patients, disadvantages such as medication side-effects and the inconvenience of safety monitoring were sufficient hindrances to their lifestyle to justify DMARD withdrawal. However, patients who were vulnerable to loss of physical function, or who had prior experience of severe rheumatoid arthritis, expressed a strong preference against DMARD withdrawal, viewing the potential for increased pain and future disability as unacceptable risks. CONCLUSIONS: Patients view DMARD withdrawal in the context of either restoring or threatening their “normal lives”. In this model, social and personal factors play a crucial role in influencing patients’ opinions of DMARD therapy beyond a simple consideration of medication side-effects alone. A formulaic approach to DMARD withdrawal determined and imposed by clinicians would not be successful. Instead, the discussion of DMARD withdrawal should take place with the identification of patients’ priorities and in the context of their personal disease experiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02064400), retrospectively registered 17 February 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-019-0070-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65676582019-06-20 “Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis Baker, Kenneth F. Isaacs, John D. Thompson, Ben BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: Withdrawal of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) once disease remission is achieved is endorsed by current international rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management guidelines. However, very little data exists concerning patients’ views of this practice. In this qualitative study, we aimed to explore patients’ perspectives on DMARD withdrawal in the setting of established RA. METHODS: In this qualitative interview study, patients with stable established RA were recruited from rheumatology outpatient clinics at a large UK teaching hospital. The perceived advantages and disadvantages of DMARDs and views on DMARD withdrawal were explored in semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analysed using standard qualitative techniques to construct an analytical framework. RESULTS: Thirteen participants (8 female, median [IQR] age 65 [61–73]) expressed their views of DMARD treatment in the context of their “normal lives”. For some patients, disadvantages such as medication side-effects and the inconvenience of safety monitoring were sufficient hindrances to their lifestyle to justify DMARD withdrawal. However, patients who were vulnerable to loss of physical function, or who had prior experience of severe rheumatoid arthritis, expressed a strong preference against DMARD withdrawal, viewing the potential for increased pain and future disability as unacceptable risks. CONCLUSIONS: Patients view DMARD withdrawal in the context of either restoring or threatening their “normal lives”. In this model, social and personal factors play a crucial role in influencing patients’ opinions of DMARD therapy beyond a simple consideration of medication side-effects alone. A formulaic approach to DMARD withdrawal determined and imposed by clinicians would not be successful. Instead, the discussion of DMARD withdrawal should take place with the identification of patients’ priorities and in the context of their personal disease experiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02064400), retrospectively registered 17 February 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-019-0070-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567658/ /pubmed/31225429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0070-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baker, Kenneth F.
Isaacs, John D.
Thompson, Ben
“Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis
title “Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis
title_full “Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr “Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed “Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis
title_short “Living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort “living a normal life”: a qualitative study of patients’ views of medication withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0070-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerkennethf livinganormallifeaqualitativestudyofpatientsviewsofmedicationwithdrawalinrheumatoidarthritis
AT isaacsjohnd livinganormallifeaqualitativestudyofpatientsviewsofmedicationwithdrawalinrheumatoidarthritis
AT thompsonben livinganormallifeaqualitativestudyofpatientsviewsofmedicationwithdrawalinrheumatoidarthritis