Cargando…
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed?
OBJECTIVE: To explore noninvasive assessment of liver fat content with iron deposition using magnetic resonance (MR) quantitative technology. METHODS: A water–fat phantom with iron deposition containing 63 vials with predetermined fat percentages and iron concentrations was constructed. Thirty-three...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519836033 |
_version_ | 1783427149391200256 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Qian Ye, Feng Ma, Peiqing Chen, Feng Che, Yiqun Zhao, Xinming Yang, Li |
author_facet | Wang, Qian Ye, Feng Ma, Peiqing Chen, Feng Che, Yiqun Zhao, Xinming Yang, Li |
author_sort | Wang, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore noninvasive assessment of liver fat content with iron deposition using magnetic resonance (MR) quantitative technology. METHODS: A water–fat phantom with iron deposition containing 63 vials with predetermined fat percentages and iron concentrations was constructed. Thirty-three patients underwent fat quantitative MR examinations. The fat fraction (FF) was determined by three Dixon techniques. Pathological evaluation findings and the steatosis area rate (SAR) were used as the gold standards. RESULTS: FF(IOP) and FF(LAVA-Flex) significantly differed from FF(TEST) for iron concentrations of 1 to 30 µg/mL and fat components of 10% to 80%. Using the three Dixon techniques, FF(IOP) was 15.76% ± 6.98%, FF(LAVA-Flex) was 16.71% ± 6.77%, and FF(IDEAL IQ) was 13.18% ± 6.42% in patients without liver cirrhosis; these values in patients with liver cirrhosis were 20.35% ± 6.11%, 20.89% ± 8.49%, and 12.86% ± 4.00%, respectively. The SAR in patients without and with liver cirrhosis was 11.31% ± 5.89% and 9.84% ± 4.17%, respectively. There were significant positive correlations between FF(IDEAL IQ) and SAR with or without liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Iron deposition must be considered when using quantitative MR techniques to evaluate the hepatic fat content. Compared with the IOP and LAVA-Flex techniques, the IDEAL IQ technique has more stability and accuracy in measurement of the hepatic fat content, free from iron deposition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6567757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65677572019-06-20 Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? Wang, Qian Ye, Feng Ma, Peiqing Chen, Feng Che, Yiqun Zhao, Xinming Yang, Li J Int Med Res Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: To explore noninvasive assessment of liver fat content with iron deposition using magnetic resonance (MR) quantitative technology. METHODS: A water–fat phantom with iron deposition containing 63 vials with predetermined fat percentages and iron concentrations was constructed. Thirty-three patients underwent fat quantitative MR examinations. The fat fraction (FF) was determined by three Dixon techniques. Pathological evaluation findings and the steatosis area rate (SAR) were used as the gold standards. RESULTS: FF(IOP) and FF(LAVA-Flex) significantly differed from FF(TEST) for iron concentrations of 1 to 30 µg/mL and fat components of 10% to 80%. Using the three Dixon techniques, FF(IOP) was 15.76% ± 6.98%, FF(LAVA-Flex) was 16.71% ± 6.77%, and FF(IDEAL IQ) was 13.18% ± 6.42% in patients without liver cirrhosis; these values in patients with liver cirrhosis were 20.35% ± 6.11%, 20.89% ± 8.49%, and 12.86% ± 4.00%, respectively. The SAR in patients without and with liver cirrhosis was 11.31% ± 5.89% and 9.84% ± 4.17%, respectively. There were significant positive correlations between FF(IDEAL IQ) and SAR with or without liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Iron deposition must be considered when using quantitative MR techniques to evaluate the hepatic fat content. Compared with the IOP and LAVA-Flex techniques, the IDEAL IQ technique has more stability and accuracy in measurement of the hepatic fat content, free from iron deposition. SAGE Publications 2019-03-12 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6567757/ /pubmed/30859893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519836033 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Reports Wang, Qian Ye, Feng Ma, Peiqing Chen, Feng Che, Yiqun Zhao, Xinming Yang, Li Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? |
title | Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? |
title_full | Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? |
title_fullStr | Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? |
title_short | Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? |
title_sort | quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of hepatic fat content with iron deposition: will it be disturbed? |
topic | Clinical Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519836033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangqian quantitativemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofhepaticfatcontentwithirondepositionwillitbedisturbed AT yefeng quantitativemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofhepaticfatcontentwithirondepositionwillitbedisturbed AT mapeiqing quantitativemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofhepaticfatcontentwithirondepositionwillitbedisturbed AT chenfeng quantitativemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofhepaticfatcontentwithirondepositionwillitbedisturbed AT cheyiqun quantitativemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofhepaticfatcontentwithirondepositionwillitbedisturbed AT zhaoxinming quantitativemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofhepaticfatcontentwithirondepositionwillitbedisturbed AT yangli quantitativemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofhepaticfatcontentwithirondepositionwillitbedisturbed |