Cargando…
Perspectives of non-specialists on the potential to serve as ethics committee members
OBJECTIVE: In Japan, under the new Clinical Trials Act pertaining to investigator-initiated clinical trials that came into effect on 1 April 2018, review boards should review proposed clinical trials while considering written opinions from specialists. Additionally, involvement of non-specialists is...
Autores principales: | Kane, Chikako, Takechi, Kenshi, Chuma, Masayuki, Nokihara, Hiroshi, Takagai, Tomoko, Yanagawa, Hiroaki |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518823941 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Research ethics consultation: an attempt and 5-year experience in a Japanese University Hospital
por: Yanagawa, Hiroaki, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Is it easy to be an Ethics Committee member? (Experiences as an Ethics Committee member)
por: Chaturvedi, Santosh K.
Publicado: (2017) -
The role of nursing members in research ethics committees in Japan
por: Sakaida, Yuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Team members perspectives on conflicts in clinical ethics
committees
por: Scherer, Anika, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Ethics committee member: Reviewing the ‘Ethics’ in clinical research
por: Tripathi, Raakhi
Publicado: (2013)