Cargando…
What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model
Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) is a promising technique in multiple myeloma (MM), the development of other radiopharmaceuticals seems relevant. CD138 is currently used as a standard marker for the identification of myeloma cells and could b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102564 |
_version_ | 1783427165293903872 |
---|---|
author | Bailly, Clément Gouard, Sébastien Guérard, François Chalopin, Benjamin Carlier, Thomas Faivre-Chauvet, Alain Remaud-Le Saëc, Patricia Bourgeois, Mickaël Chouin, Nicolas Rbah-Vidal, Latifa Tripier, Raphaël Haddad, Ferid Kraeber-Bodéré, Françoise Bodet-Milin, Caroline Chérel, Michel |
author_facet | Bailly, Clément Gouard, Sébastien Guérard, François Chalopin, Benjamin Carlier, Thomas Faivre-Chauvet, Alain Remaud-Le Saëc, Patricia Bourgeois, Mickaël Chouin, Nicolas Rbah-Vidal, Latifa Tripier, Raphaël Haddad, Ferid Kraeber-Bodéré, Françoise Bodet-Milin, Caroline Chérel, Michel |
author_sort | Bailly, Clément |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) is a promising technique in multiple myeloma (MM), the development of other radiopharmaceuticals seems relevant. CD138 is currently used as a standard marker for the identification of myeloma cells and could be used in phenotype tumor imaging. In this study, we used an anti-CD138 murine antibody (9E7.4) radiolabeled with copper-64 ((64)Cu) or zirconium-89 ((89)Zr) and compared them in a syngeneic mouse model to select the optimal tracers for MM PET imaging. Then, 9E7.4 was conjugated to TE2A-benzyl isothiocyanate (TE2A) and desferrioxamine (DFO) chelators for (64)Cu and (89)Zr labeling, respectively. (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 antibodies were evaluated by PET imaging and biodistribution studies in C57BL/KaLwRij mice bearing either 5T33-MM subcutaneous tumors or bone lesions and were compared to (18)F-FDG-PET imaging. In biodistribution and PET studies, (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 displayed comparable good tumor uptake of subcutaneous tumors. On the bone lesions, PET imaging with (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 showed higher uptake than with (18)F-FDG-PET. Comparison of both 9E7.4 conjugates revealed higher nonspecific bone uptakes of (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 than (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4. Because of free (89)Zr’s tropism for bone when using (89)Zr-anti-CD138, (64)Cu-anti-CD138 antibody had the most optimal tumor-to-nontarget tissue ratios for translation into humans as a specific new imaging radiopharmaceutical agent in MM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6567828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65678282019-06-17 What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model Bailly, Clément Gouard, Sébastien Guérard, François Chalopin, Benjamin Carlier, Thomas Faivre-Chauvet, Alain Remaud-Le Saëc, Patricia Bourgeois, Mickaël Chouin, Nicolas Rbah-Vidal, Latifa Tripier, Raphaël Haddad, Ferid Kraeber-Bodéré, Françoise Bodet-Milin, Caroline Chérel, Michel Int J Mol Sci Article Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) is a promising technique in multiple myeloma (MM), the development of other radiopharmaceuticals seems relevant. CD138 is currently used as a standard marker for the identification of myeloma cells and could be used in phenotype tumor imaging. In this study, we used an anti-CD138 murine antibody (9E7.4) radiolabeled with copper-64 ((64)Cu) or zirconium-89 ((89)Zr) and compared them in a syngeneic mouse model to select the optimal tracers for MM PET imaging. Then, 9E7.4 was conjugated to TE2A-benzyl isothiocyanate (TE2A) and desferrioxamine (DFO) chelators for (64)Cu and (89)Zr labeling, respectively. (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 antibodies were evaluated by PET imaging and biodistribution studies in C57BL/KaLwRij mice bearing either 5T33-MM subcutaneous tumors or bone lesions and were compared to (18)F-FDG-PET imaging. In biodistribution and PET studies, (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 displayed comparable good tumor uptake of subcutaneous tumors. On the bone lesions, PET imaging with (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 showed higher uptake than with (18)F-FDG-PET. Comparison of both 9E7.4 conjugates revealed higher nonspecific bone uptakes of (89)Zr-DFO-9E7.4 than (64)Cu-TE2A-9E7.4. Because of free (89)Zr’s tropism for bone when using (89)Zr-anti-CD138, (64)Cu-anti-CD138 antibody had the most optimal tumor-to-nontarget tissue ratios for translation into humans as a specific new imaging radiopharmaceutical agent in MM. MDPI 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6567828/ /pubmed/31137758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102564 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bailly, Clément Gouard, Sébastien Guérard, François Chalopin, Benjamin Carlier, Thomas Faivre-Chauvet, Alain Remaud-Le Saëc, Patricia Bourgeois, Mickaël Chouin, Nicolas Rbah-Vidal, Latifa Tripier, Raphaël Haddad, Ferid Kraeber-Bodéré, Françoise Bodet-Milin, Caroline Chérel, Michel What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model |
title | What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model |
title_full | What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model |
title_fullStr | What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model |
title_short | What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between (89)Zr- and (64)Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model |
title_sort | what is the best radionuclide for immuno-pet of multiple myeloma? a comparison study between (89)zr- and (64)cu-labeled anti-cd138 in a preclinical syngeneic model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31137758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baillyclement whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT gouardsebastien whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT guerardfrancois whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT chalopinbenjamin whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT carlierthomas whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT faivrechauvetalain whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT remaudlesaecpatricia whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT bourgeoismickael whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT chouinnicolas whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT rbahvidallatifa whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT tripierraphael whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT haddadferid whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT kraeberboderefrancoise whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT bodetmilincaroline whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel AT cherelmichel whatisthebestradionuclideforimmunopetofmultiplemyelomaacomparisonstudybetween89zrand64culabeledanticd138inapreclinicalsyngeneicmodel |