Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
BACKGROUND: Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis relies on a combination of tests which may include (a) nasal Nitric Oxide (nNO), (b) High Speed Video Microscopy (HSVM) and (c) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). There is variability in the availability of these tests and lack of universal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3 |
_version_ | 1783427179945656320 |
---|---|
author | Kouis, Panayiotis Papatheodorou, Stefania I. Middleton, Nicos Giallouros, George Kyriacou, Kyriacos Cohen, Joshua T. Evans, John S. Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. |
author_facet | Kouis, Panayiotis Papatheodorou, Stefania I. Middleton, Nicos Giallouros, George Kyriacou, Kyriacos Cohen, Joshua T. Evans, John S. Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. |
author_sort | Kouis, Panayiotis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis relies on a combination of tests which may include (a) nasal Nitric Oxide (nNO), (b) High Speed Video Microscopy (HSVM) and (c) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). There is variability in the availability of these tests and lack of universal agreement whether diagnostic tests should be performed in sequence or in parallel. We assessed three combinations of tests for PCD diagnosis and estimated net sensitivity and specificity as well as cost-effectiveness (CE) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICE) ratios. METHODS AND RESULTS: A hypothetical initial population of 1000 referrals (expected 320 PCD patients) was followed through a probabilistic decision analysis model which was created to assess the CE of three diagnostic algorithms (a) nNO + TEM in sequence, (b) nNO + HSVM in sequence and (c) nNO/HSVM in parallel followed, in cases with conflicting results, by confirmatory TEM (nNO/HSVM+TEM). Number of PCD patients identified, CE and ICE ratios were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. Out of 320 expected PCD patients, 313 were identified by nNO/HSVM+TEM, 274 with nNO + HSVM and 198 with nNO + TEM. The nNO/HSVM+TEM had the highest mean annual cost (€209 K) followed by nNO + TEM (€150 K) and nNO + HSVM (€136 K). The nNO + HSVM algorithm dominated the nNO + TEM algorithm (less costly and more effective). The ICE ratio for nNO/HSVM+TEM was €2.1 K per additional PCD patient identified. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic algorithm (nNO/HSVM+TEM) with parallel testing outperforms algorithms with tests in sequence. These findings, can inform the dialogue on the development of evidence-based guidelines for PCD diagnostic testing. Future research in understudied aspects of the disease, such as PCD-related quality of life and PCD-associated costs, is needed to help the better implementation of these guidelines across various healthcare systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6567920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65679202019-06-27 Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study Kouis, Panayiotis Papatheodorou, Stefania I. Middleton, Nicos Giallouros, George Kyriacou, Kyriacos Cohen, Joshua T. Evans, John S. Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis relies on a combination of tests which may include (a) nasal Nitric Oxide (nNO), (b) High Speed Video Microscopy (HSVM) and (c) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). There is variability in the availability of these tests and lack of universal agreement whether diagnostic tests should be performed in sequence or in parallel. We assessed three combinations of tests for PCD diagnosis and estimated net sensitivity and specificity as well as cost-effectiveness (CE) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICE) ratios. METHODS AND RESULTS: A hypothetical initial population of 1000 referrals (expected 320 PCD patients) was followed through a probabilistic decision analysis model which was created to assess the CE of three diagnostic algorithms (a) nNO + TEM in sequence, (b) nNO + HSVM in sequence and (c) nNO/HSVM in parallel followed, in cases with conflicting results, by confirmatory TEM (nNO/HSVM+TEM). Number of PCD patients identified, CE and ICE ratios were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. Out of 320 expected PCD patients, 313 were identified by nNO/HSVM+TEM, 274 with nNO + HSVM and 198 with nNO + TEM. The nNO/HSVM+TEM had the highest mean annual cost (€209 K) followed by nNO + TEM (€150 K) and nNO + HSVM (€136 K). The nNO + HSVM algorithm dominated the nNO + TEM algorithm (less costly and more effective). The ICE ratio for nNO/HSVM+TEM was €2.1 K per additional PCD patient identified. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic algorithm (nNO/HSVM+TEM) with parallel testing outperforms algorithms with tests in sequence. These findings, can inform the dialogue on the development of evidence-based guidelines for PCD diagnostic testing. Future research in understudied aspects of the disease, such as PCD-related quality of life and PCD-associated costs, is needed to help the better implementation of these guidelines across various healthcare systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567920/ /pubmed/31196140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kouis, Panayiotis Papatheodorou, Stefania I. Middleton, Nicos Giallouros, George Kyriacou, Kyriacos Cohen, Joshua T. Evans, John S. Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kouispanayiotis costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy AT papatheodoroustefaniai costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy AT middletonnicos costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy AT giallourosgeorge costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy AT kyriacoukyriacos costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy AT cohenjoshuat costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy AT evansjohns costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy AT yiallourospanayiotisk costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy |