Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study

BACKGROUND: Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis relies on a combination of tests which may include (a) nasal Nitric Oxide (nNO), (b) High Speed Video Microscopy (HSVM) and (c) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). There is variability in the availability of these tests and lack of universal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kouis, Panayiotis, Papatheodorou, Stefania I., Middleton, Nicos, Giallouros, George, Kyriacou, Kyriacos, Cohen, Joshua T., Evans, John S., Yiallouros, Panayiotis K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3
_version_ 1783427179945656320
author Kouis, Panayiotis
Papatheodorou, Stefania I.
Middleton, Nicos
Giallouros, George
Kyriacou, Kyriacos
Cohen, Joshua T.
Evans, John S.
Yiallouros, Panayiotis K.
author_facet Kouis, Panayiotis
Papatheodorou, Stefania I.
Middleton, Nicos
Giallouros, George
Kyriacou, Kyriacos
Cohen, Joshua T.
Evans, John S.
Yiallouros, Panayiotis K.
author_sort Kouis, Panayiotis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis relies on a combination of tests which may include (a) nasal Nitric Oxide (nNO), (b) High Speed Video Microscopy (HSVM) and (c) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). There is variability in the availability of these tests and lack of universal agreement whether diagnostic tests should be performed in sequence or in parallel. We assessed three combinations of tests for PCD diagnosis and estimated net sensitivity and specificity as well as cost-effectiveness (CE) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICE) ratios. METHODS AND RESULTS: A hypothetical initial population of 1000 referrals (expected 320 PCD patients) was followed through a probabilistic decision analysis model which was created to assess the CE of three diagnostic algorithms (a) nNO + TEM in sequence, (b) nNO + HSVM in sequence and (c) nNO/HSVM in parallel followed, in cases with conflicting results, by confirmatory TEM (nNO/HSVM+TEM). Number of PCD patients identified, CE and ICE ratios were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. Out of 320 expected PCD patients, 313 were identified by nNO/HSVM+TEM, 274 with nNO + HSVM and 198 with nNO + TEM. The nNO/HSVM+TEM had the highest mean annual cost (€209 K) followed by nNO + TEM (€150 K) and nNO + HSVM (€136 K). The nNO + HSVM algorithm dominated the nNO + TEM algorithm (less costly and more effective). The ICE ratio for nNO/HSVM+TEM was €2.1 K per additional PCD patient identified. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic algorithm (nNO/HSVM+TEM) with parallel testing outperforms algorithms with tests in sequence. These findings, can inform the dialogue on the development of evidence-based guidelines for PCD diagnostic testing. Future research in understudied aspects of the disease, such as PCD-related quality of life and PCD-associated costs, is needed to help the better implementation of these guidelines across various healthcare systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6567920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65679202019-06-27 Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study Kouis, Panayiotis Papatheodorou, Stefania I. Middleton, Nicos Giallouros, George Kyriacou, Kyriacos Cohen, Joshua T. Evans, John S. Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis relies on a combination of tests which may include (a) nasal Nitric Oxide (nNO), (b) High Speed Video Microscopy (HSVM) and (c) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). There is variability in the availability of these tests and lack of universal agreement whether diagnostic tests should be performed in sequence or in parallel. We assessed three combinations of tests for PCD diagnosis and estimated net sensitivity and specificity as well as cost-effectiveness (CE) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICE) ratios. METHODS AND RESULTS: A hypothetical initial population of 1000 referrals (expected 320 PCD patients) was followed through a probabilistic decision analysis model which was created to assess the CE of three diagnostic algorithms (a) nNO + TEM in sequence, (b) nNO + HSVM in sequence and (c) nNO/HSVM in parallel followed, in cases with conflicting results, by confirmatory TEM (nNO/HSVM+TEM). Number of PCD patients identified, CE and ICE ratios were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. Out of 320 expected PCD patients, 313 were identified by nNO/HSVM+TEM, 274 with nNO + HSVM and 198 with nNO + TEM. The nNO/HSVM+TEM had the highest mean annual cost (€209 K) followed by nNO + TEM (€150 K) and nNO + HSVM (€136 K). The nNO + HSVM algorithm dominated the nNO + TEM algorithm (less costly and more effective). The ICE ratio for nNO/HSVM+TEM was €2.1 K per additional PCD patient identified. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic algorithm (nNO/HSVM+TEM) with parallel testing outperforms algorithms with tests in sequence. These findings, can inform the dialogue on the development of evidence-based guidelines for PCD diagnostic testing. Future research in understudied aspects of the disease, such as PCD-related quality of life and PCD-associated costs, is needed to help the better implementation of these guidelines across various healthcare systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6567920/ /pubmed/31196140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kouis, Panayiotis
Papatheodorou, Stefania I.
Middleton, Nicos
Giallouros, George
Kyriacou, Kyriacos
Cohen, Joshua T.
Evans, John S.
Yiallouros, Panayiotis K.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of three algorithms for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia: a simulation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6567920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1116-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kouispanayiotis costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy
AT papatheodoroustefaniai costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy
AT middletonnicos costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy
AT giallourosgeorge costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy
AT kyriacoukyriacos costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy
AT cohenjoshuat costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy
AT evansjohns costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy
AT yiallourospanayiotisk costeffectivenessanalysisofthreealgorithmsfordiagnosingprimaryciliarydyskinesiaasimulationstudy