Cargando…

Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism

Instances of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) provide the context for rigorous tests of biological rules of size evolution, such as Cope’s rule (phyletic size increase), Rensch’s rule (allometric patterns of male and female size), as well as male and female body size optima. In certain spider groups, su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuntner, Matjaž, Hamilton, Chris A, Cheng, Ren-Chung, Gregorič, Matjaž, Lupše, Nik, Lokovšek, Tjaša, Lemmon, Emily Moriarty, Lemmon, Alan R, Agnarsson, Ingi, Coddington, Jonathan A, Bond, Jason E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6568015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy082
_version_ 1783427194812366848
author Kuntner, Matjaž
Hamilton, Chris A
Cheng, Ren-Chung
Gregorič, Matjaž
Lupše, Nik
Lokovšek, Tjaša
Lemmon, Emily Moriarty
Lemmon, Alan R
Agnarsson, Ingi
Coddington, Jonathan A
Bond, Jason E
author_facet Kuntner, Matjaž
Hamilton, Chris A
Cheng, Ren-Chung
Gregorič, Matjaž
Lupše, Nik
Lokovšek, Tjaša
Lemmon, Emily Moriarty
Lemmon, Alan R
Agnarsson, Ingi
Coddington, Jonathan A
Bond, Jason E
author_sort Kuntner, Matjaž
collection PubMed
description Instances of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) provide the context for rigorous tests of biological rules of size evolution, such as Cope’s rule (phyletic size increase), Rensch’s rule (allometric patterns of male and female size), as well as male and female body size optima. In certain spider groups, such as the golden orbweavers (Nephilidae), extreme female-biased SSD (eSSD, female:male body length [Formula: see text] 2) is the norm. Nephilid genera construct webs of exaggerated proportions, which can be aerial, arboricolous, or intermediate (hybrid). First, we established the backbone phylogeny of Nephilidae using 367 anchored hybrid enrichment markers, then combined these data with classical markers for a reference species-level phylogeny. Second, we used the phylogeny to test Cope and Rensch’s rules, sex specific size optima, and the coevolution of web size, type, and features with female and male body size and their ratio, SSD. Male, but not female, size increases significantly over time, and refutes Cope’s rule. Allometric analyses reject the converse, Rensch’s rule. Male and female body sizes are uncorrelated. Female size evolution is random, but males evolve toward an optimum size (3.2–4.9 mm). Overall, female body size correlates positively with absolute web size. However, intermediate sized females build the largest webs (of the hybrid type), giant female Nephila and Trichonephila build smaller webs (of the aerial type), and the smallest females build the smallest webs (of the arboricolous type). We propose taxonomic changes based on the criteria of clade age, monophyly and exclusivity, classification information content, and diagnosability. Spider families, as currently defined, tend to be between 37 million years old and 98 million years old, and Nephilidae is estimated at 133 Ma (97–146), thus deserving family status. We, therefore, resurrect the family Nephilidae Simon 1894 that contains Clitaetra Simon 1889, the Cretaceous GeratonephilaPoinar and Buckley (2012), Herennia Thorell 1877, IndoetraKuntner 2006, new rank, Nephila Leach 1815, Nephilengys L. Koch 1872, Nephilingis Kuntner 2013, Palaeonephila Wunderlich 2004 from Tertiary Baltic amber, and TrichonephilaDahl 1911, new rank. We propose the new clade Orbipurae to contain Araneidae Clerck 1757, Phonognathidae Simon 1894, new rank, and Nephilidae. Nephilid female gigantism is a phylogenetically ancient phenotype (over 100 Ma), as is eSSD, though their magnitudes vary by lineage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6568015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65680152019-06-18 Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism Kuntner, Matjaž Hamilton, Chris A Cheng, Ren-Chung Gregorič, Matjaž Lupše, Nik Lokovšek, Tjaša Lemmon, Emily Moriarty Lemmon, Alan R Agnarsson, Ingi Coddington, Jonathan A Bond, Jason E Syst Biol Regular Articles Instances of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) provide the context for rigorous tests of biological rules of size evolution, such as Cope’s rule (phyletic size increase), Rensch’s rule (allometric patterns of male and female size), as well as male and female body size optima. In certain spider groups, such as the golden orbweavers (Nephilidae), extreme female-biased SSD (eSSD, female:male body length [Formula: see text] 2) is the norm. Nephilid genera construct webs of exaggerated proportions, which can be aerial, arboricolous, or intermediate (hybrid). First, we established the backbone phylogeny of Nephilidae using 367 anchored hybrid enrichment markers, then combined these data with classical markers for a reference species-level phylogeny. Second, we used the phylogeny to test Cope and Rensch’s rules, sex specific size optima, and the coevolution of web size, type, and features with female and male body size and their ratio, SSD. Male, but not female, size increases significantly over time, and refutes Cope’s rule. Allometric analyses reject the converse, Rensch’s rule. Male and female body sizes are uncorrelated. Female size evolution is random, but males evolve toward an optimum size (3.2–4.9 mm). Overall, female body size correlates positively with absolute web size. However, intermediate sized females build the largest webs (of the hybrid type), giant female Nephila and Trichonephila build smaller webs (of the aerial type), and the smallest females build the smallest webs (of the arboricolous type). We propose taxonomic changes based on the criteria of clade age, monophyly and exclusivity, classification information content, and diagnosability. Spider families, as currently defined, tend to be between 37 million years old and 98 million years old, and Nephilidae is estimated at 133 Ma (97–146), thus deserving family status. We, therefore, resurrect the family Nephilidae Simon 1894 that contains Clitaetra Simon 1889, the Cretaceous GeratonephilaPoinar and Buckley (2012), Herennia Thorell 1877, IndoetraKuntner 2006, new rank, Nephila Leach 1815, Nephilengys L. Koch 1872, Nephilingis Kuntner 2013, Palaeonephila Wunderlich 2004 from Tertiary Baltic amber, and TrichonephilaDahl 1911, new rank. We propose the new clade Orbipurae to contain Araneidae Clerck 1757, Phonognathidae Simon 1894, new rank, and Nephilidae. Nephilid female gigantism is a phylogenetically ancient phenotype (over 100 Ma), as is eSSD, though their magnitudes vary by lineage. Oxford University Press 2019-07 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6568015/ /pubmed/30517732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy082 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Kuntner, Matjaž
Hamilton, Chris A
Cheng, Ren-Chung
Gregorič, Matjaž
Lupše, Nik
Lokovšek, Tjaša
Lemmon, Emily Moriarty
Lemmon, Alan R
Agnarsson, Ingi
Coddington, Jonathan A
Bond, Jason E
Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism
title Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism
title_full Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism
title_fullStr Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism
title_full_unstemmed Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism
title_short Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism
title_sort golden orbweavers ignore biological rules: phylogenomic and comparative analyses unravel a complex evolution of sexual size dimorphism
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6568015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy082
work_keys_str_mv AT kuntnermatjaz goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT hamiltonchrisa goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT chengrenchung goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT gregoricmatjaz goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT lupsenik goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT lokovsektjasa goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT lemmonemilymoriarty goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT lemmonalanr goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT agnarssoningi goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT coddingtonjonathana goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism
AT bondjasone goldenorbweaversignorebiologicalrulesphylogenomicandcomparativeanalysesunravelacomplexevolutionofsexualsizedimorphism