Cargando…

The continuum of critical care

Until relatively recently, critical illness was considered as a separate entity and the intensive care unit (ICU), often a little cut-off from other areas of the hospital, was in many cases used as a last resort for patients so severely ill that it was no longer possible to care for them on the gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vincent, Jean-Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6570628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31200740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2393-x
_version_ 1783427266408087552
author Vincent, Jean-Louis
author_facet Vincent, Jean-Louis
author_sort Vincent, Jean-Louis
collection PubMed
description Until relatively recently, critical illness was considered as a separate entity and the intensive care unit (ICU), often a little cut-off from other areas of the hospital, was in many cases used as a last resort for patients so severely ill that it was no longer possible to care for them on the general ward. However, we are increasingly realizing that critical illness should be seen as just one part of the patient’s disease trajectory and how the patient is managed before and after ICU admission has an important role to play in optimizing outcomes. Identifying critical illness early, before it reaches a stage where it is life-threatening, is a challenge and requires a combination of improved and more frequent or continuous monitoring of at-risk patients, staff training to recognize when a patient is deteriorating, a system to “call for help,” and an effective response to that call. Critical care doctors are now widely available 24 h a day for consultation, and many hospitals have rapid response or medical emergency teams composed of staff trained in intensive care and with resuscitation skills who can attend patients on the ward who have been identified to be deteriorating, assess them to determine the need for ICU admission, and initiate further tests and/or initial therapy. Early intensivist input may also be important for patients undergoing interventions that are likely to result in ICU admission, e.g., transplantation or cardiac surgery. The patient’s continuum after ICU discharge must also be taken into account during their ICU stay, with attempts made to limit the longer-term physical and psychological consequences of critical illness as much as possible. Minimal sedation, good communication, and early mobilization are three factors that can help patients survive their ICU stay with minimal sequelae.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6570628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65706282019-06-27 The continuum of critical care Vincent, Jean-Louis Crit Care Review Until relatively recently, critical illness was considered as a separate entity and the intensive care unit (ICU), often a little cut-off from other areas of the hospital, was in many cases used as a last resort for patients so severely ill that it was no longer possible to care for them on the general ward. However, we are increasingly realizing that critical illness should be seen as just one part of the patient’s disease trajectory and how the patient is managed before and after ICU admission has an important role to play in optimizing outcomes. Identifying critical illness early, before it reaches a stage where it is life-threatening, is a challenge and requires a combination of improved and more frequent or continuous monitoring of at-risk patients, staff training to recognize when a patient is deteriorating, a system to “call for help,” and an effective response to that call. Critical care doctors are now widely available 24 h a day for consultation, and many hospitals have rapid response or medical emergency teams composed of staff trained in intensive care and with resuscitation skills who can attend patients on the ward who have been identified to be deteriorating, assess them to determine the need for ICU admission, and initiate further tests and/or initial therapy. Early intensivist input may also be important for patients undergoing interventions that are likely to result in ICU admission, e.g., transplantation or cardiac surgery. The patient’s continuum after ICU discharge must also be taken into account during their ICU stay, with attempts made to limit the longer-term physical and psychological consequences of critical illness as much as possible. Minimal sedation, good communication, and early mobilization are three factors that can help patients survive their ICU stay with minimal sequelae. BioMed Central 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6570628/ /pubmed/31200740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2393-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Vincent, Jean-Louis
The continuum of critical care
title The continuum of critical care
title_full The continuum of critical care
title_fullStr The continuum of critical care
title_full_unstemmed The continuum of critical care
title_short The continuum of critical care
title_sort continuum of critical care
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6570628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31200740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2393-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentjeanlouis thecontinuumofcriticalcare
AT vincentjeanlouis continuumofcriticalcare