Cargando…

Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE: Different fixation methods are used for treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures (LCF). Definitive consensus and guidelines for the surgical fixation of LCF have not been established. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported functional outcome after open reduction and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ochen, Yassine, Frima, Herman, Houwert, R. Marijn, Heng, Marilyn, van Heijl, Mark, Verleisdonk, Egbert J. M. M., van der Velde, Detlef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6570672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02411-9
_version_ 1783427276136775680
author Ochen, Yassine
Frima, Herman
Houwert, R. Marijn
Heng, Marilyn
van Heijl, Mark
Verleisdonk, Egbert J. M. M.
van der Velde, Detlef
author_facet Ochen, Yassine
Frima, Herman
Houwert, R. Marijn
Heng, Marilyn
van Heijl, Mark
Verleisdonk, Egbert J. M. M.
van der Velde, Detlef
author_sort Ochen, Yassine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Different fixation methods are used for treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures (LCF). Definitive consensus and guidelines for the surgical fixation of LCF have not been established. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the clavicle hook plate (CHP) and the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension (SCPLE). METHODS: A dual-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients operatively treated for unstable Neer type II and type V LCF between 2011 and 2016, with the CHP (n = 23) or SCPLE (n = 53), were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, complications, and implant removal. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients (88%) were available for the final follow-up. There was a significant difference in bicortical lateral fragment size, 15 mm (± 4, range 6–21) in the CPH group compared to 20 mm (± 8, range 8–43) in the SCPLE group (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score (CHP; 0.00 [IQR 0.0–0.0], SCPLE; 0.00 [IQR 0.0–4.5]; p = 0.073) or other functional outcome scores (NRS at rest; p = 0.373, NRS during activity; p = 0.559). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score or other functional outcome scores between Neer type II and type V fractures. There was no significant difference in complication rate, CHP 11% and SCPLE 8% (relative risk 1.26; [95% CI 0.25–6.33; p = 0.777]). The implant removal rate was 100% in the CHP group compared to 42% in the SCPLE group (relative risk 2.40; [95% CI 1.72–3.35; p ≤ 0.001]). CONCLUSION: Both the CHP and SCPLE are effective fixation methods for the treatment of unstable LCF, resulting in excellent patient-reported functional outcome and similar complication rates. SCPLE fixation is an effective fixation method for the treatment of both Neer type II and type V LCF. The SCPLE has a lower implant removal rate. Therefore, if technically feasible, we recommend SCPLE fixation for the treatment of unstable LCF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6570672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65706722019-07-01 Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study Ochen, Yassine Frima, Herman Houwert, R. Marijn Heng, Marilyn van Heijl, Mark Verleisdonk, Egbert J. M. M. van der Velde, Detlef Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Original Article • SHOULDER - FRACTURES PURPOSE: Different fixation methods are used for treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures (LCF). Definitive consensus and guidelines for the surgical fixation of LCF have not been established. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the clavicle hook plate (CHP) and the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension (SCPLE). METHODS: A dual-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients operatively treated for unstable Neer type II and type V LCF between 2011 and 2016, with the CHP (n = 23) or SCPLE (n = 53), were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, complications, and implant removal. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients (88%) were available for the final follow-up. There was a significant difference in bicortical lateral fragment size, 15 mm (± 4, range 6–21) in the CPH group compared to 20 mm (± 8, range 8–43) in the SCPLE group (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score (CHP; 0.00 [IQR 0.0–0.0], SCPLE; 0.00 [IQR 0.0–4.5]; p = 0.073) or other functional outcome scores (NRS at rest; p = 0.373, NRS during activity; p = 0.559). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score or other functional outcome scores between Neer type II and type V fractures. There was no significant difference in complication rate, CHP 11% and SCPLE 8% (relative risk 1.26; [95% CI 0.25–6.33; p = 0.777]). The implant removal rate was 100% in the CHP group compared to 42% in the SCPLE group (relative risk 2.40; [95% CI 1.72–3.35; p ≤ 0.001]). CONCLUSION: Both the CHP and SCPLE are effective fixation methods for the treatment of unstable LCF, resulting in excellent patient-reported functional outcome and similar complication rates. SCPLE fixation is an effective fixation method for the treatment of both Neer type II and type V LCF. The SCPLE has a lower implant removal rate. Therefore, if technically feasible, we recommend SCPLE fixation for the treatment of unstable LCF. Springer Paris 2019-03-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6570672/ /pubmed/30847678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02411-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article • SHOULDER - FRACTURES
Ochen, Yassine
Frima, Herman
Houwert, R. Marijn
Heng, Marilyn
van Heijl, Mark
Verleisdonk, Egbert J. M. M.
van der Velde, Detlef
Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
title Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort surgical treatment of neer type ii and type v lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article • SHOULDER - FRACTURES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6570672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02411-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ochenyassine surgicaltreatmentofneertypeiiandtypevlateralclavicularfracturescomparisonofhookplateversussuperiorplatewithlateralextensionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT frimaherman surgicaltreatmentofneertypeiiandtypevlateralclavicularfracturescomparisonofhookplateversussuperiorplatewithlateralextensionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT houwertrmarijn surgicaltreatmentofneertypeiiandtypevlateralclavicularfracturescomparisonofhookplateversussuperiorplatewithlateralextensionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hengmarilyn surgicaltreatmentofneertypeiiandtypevlateralclavicularfracturescomparisonofhookplateversussuperiorplatewithlateralextensionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vanheijlmark surgicaltreatmentofneertypeiiandtypevlateralclavicularfracturescomparisonofhookplateversussuperiorplatewithlateralextensionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT verleisdonkegbertjmm surgicaltreatmentofneertypeiiandtypevlateralclavicularfracturescomparisonofhookplateversussuperiorplatewithlateralextensionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vanderveldedetlef surgicaltreatmentofneertypeiiandtypevlateralclavicularfracturescomparisonofhookplateversussuperiorplatewithlateralextensionaretrospectivecohortstudy