Cargando…

Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care

BACKGROUND: We designed this observational study to investigate the level of patients’ and doctors’ ratings of patient-centred aspects of the primary care consultation. METHODS: Questionnaire study with patients and doctors. Consecutive patients in a primary care setting and 16 doctors responding po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodegård, Helene, Helgesson, Gert, Juth, Niklas, Olsson, Daniel, Lynøe, Niels
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6570949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31202259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0959-y
_version_ 1783427333602934784
author Bodegård, Helene
Helgesson, Gert
Juth, Niklas
Olsson, Daniel
Lynøe, Niels
author_facet Bodegård, Helene
Helgesson, Gert
Juth, Niklas
Olsson, Daniel
Lynøe, Niels
author_sort Bodegård, Helene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We designed this observational study to investigate the level of patients’ and doctors’ ratings of patient-centred aspects of the primary care consultation. METHODS: Questionnaire study with patients and doctors. Consecutive patients in a primary care setting and 16 doctors responding post visit. Results are presented as proportions with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: 411 questionnaires, 223 from patients and 188 from doctors, covered 251 consultations. Both patients and doctors gave the highest possible estimations on the aspects of patient-centred communication and satisfaction less frequently when the patient had other reasons for visit than purely somatic. Unlike the doctors’ estimations, the frequency of highest possible estimations in patient responses dropped if the patients had two to six reasons for visit rather than one. Among the six patient-centred aspects, both patients and doctors gave the highest possible estimation least frequently on the aspect of shared decision-making. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the nature of the reason, as well as the number of reasons for visit, interferes with the doctors’ level of patient-centred communication. Our results furthermore confirm the findings of previous studies that doctors insufficiently involve patients in their care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0959-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6570949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65709492019-06-20 Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care Bodegård, Helene Helgesson, Gert Juth, Niklas Olsson, Daniel Lynøe, Niels BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: We designed this observational study to investigate the level of patients’ and doctors’ ratings of patient-centred aspects of the primary care consultation. METHODS: Questionnaire study with patients and doctors. Consecutive patients in a primary care setting and 16 doctors responding post visit. Results are presented as proportions with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: 411 questionnaires, 223 from patients and 188 from doctors, covered 251 consultations. Both patients and doctors gave the highest possible estimations on the aspects of patient-centred communication and satisfaction less frequently when the patient had other reasons for visit than purely somatic. Unlike the doctors’ estimations, the frequency of highest possible estimations in patient responses dropped if the patients had two to six reasons for visit rather than one. Among the six patient-centred aspects, both patients and doctors gave the highest possible estimation least frequently on the aspect of shared decision-making. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the nature of the reason, as well as the number of reasons for visit, interferes with the doctors’ level of patient-centred communication. Our results furthermore confirm the findings of previous studies that doctors insufficiently involve patients in their care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0959-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6570949/ /pubmed/31202259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0959-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bodegård, Helene
Helgesson, Gert
Juth, Niklas
Olsson, Daniel
Lynøe, Niels
Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
title Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
title_full Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
title_fullStr Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
title_full_unstemmed Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
title_short Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
title_sort challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6570949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31202259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0959-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bodegardhelene challengestopatientcentrednessacomparisonofpatientanddoctorexperiencesfromprimarycare
AT helgessongert challengestopatientcentrednessacomparisonofpatientanddoctorexperiencesfromprimarycare
AT juthniklas challengestopatientcentrednessacomparisonofpatientanddoctorexperiencesfromprimarycare
AT olssondaniel challengestopatientcentrednessacomparisonofpatientanddoctorexperiencesfromprimarycare
AT lynøeniels challengestopatientcentrednessacomparisonofpatientanddoctorexperiencesfromprimarycare