Cargando…
An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
The unintentional presence of even trace amounts of certain foods constitutes a major hazard for those who suffer from food allergies. For many food industries, product and raw ingredient surveillance forms part of their risk assessment procedures. This may require the detection of multiple allergen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z |
_version_ | 1783427349910388736 |
---|---|
author | Nitride, Chiara Nørgaard, Jørgen Omar, Jone Emons, Hendrik Esteso, María-José Martínez O’Connor, Gavin |
author_facet | Nitride, Chiara Nørgaard, Jørgen Omar, Jone Emons, Hendrik Esteso, María-José Martínez O’Connor, Gavin |
author_sort | Nitride, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The unintentional presence of even trace amounts of certain foods constitutes a major hazard for those who suffer from food allergies. For many food industries, product and raw ingredient surveillance forms part of their risk assessment procedures. This may require the detection of multiple allergens in a wide variety of matrices. Mass spectrometry offers a possible solution for the quantification of multiple allergens in a single analysis. The capability of MS to quantify many peptides from a complex protein digestion is well known. However, a lack of matrix certified reference materials has made the optimisation of extraction and digestion conditions for multiplexed allergen quantification difficult to assess. Here, we report a systematic study, using preliminary screening followed by a Design of Experiments approach, to find the optimal buffer and digestion conditions for detecting milk and egg protein markers in a model processed food matrix. Five of the most commonly used buffers, two chaotropic reagents and two reducing reagents were assessed for the optimal extraction of multiple protein markers. While the choice of background buffer had little impact, the use of chaotropic and reducing reagents showed significant benefits for the extraction of most proteins. A full factorial design experiment was applied to the parameters shown to have a significant impact on protein recovery. These studies suggest that a single optimal set of extraction conditions enabling the quantitative recovery of all proteins is not easily achieved. Therefore, although MS is capable of the simultaneous quantification of many peptides in a single run, greater consideration of protein extraction is required before these are applied for multiplex allergen quantification in food matrices. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6571087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65710872019-07-02 An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens Nitride, Chiara Nørgaard, Jørgen Omar, Jone Emons, Hendrik Esteso, María-José Martínez O’Connor, Gavin Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper The unintentional presence of even trace amounts of certain foods constitutes a major hazard for those who suffer from food allergies. For many food industries, product and raw ingredient surveillance forms part of their risk assessment procedures. This may require the detection of multiple allergens in a wide variety of matrices. Mass spectrometry offers a possible solution for the quantification of multiple allergens in a single analysis. The capability of MS to quantify many peptides from a complex protein digestion is well known. However, a lack of matrix certified reference materials has made the optimisation of extraction and digestion conditions for multiplexed allergen quantification difficult to assess. Here, we report a systematic study, using preliminary screening followed by a Design of Experiments approach, to find the optimal buffer and digestion conditions for detecting milk and egg protein markers in a model processed food matrix. Five of the most commonly used buffers, two chaotropic reagents and two reducing reagents were assessed for the optimal extraction of multiple protein markers. While the choice of background buffer had little impact, the use of chaotropic and reducing reagents showed significant benefits for the extraction of most proteins. A full factorial design experiment was applied to the parameters shown to have a significant impact on protein recovery. These studies suggest that a single optimal set of extraction conditions enabling the quantitative recovery of all proteins is not easily achieved. Therefore, although MS is capable of the simultaneous quantification of many peptides in a single run, greater consideration of protein extraction is required before these are applied for multiplex allergen quantification in food matrices. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6571087/ /pubmed/31139860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Nitride, Chiara Nørgaard, Jørgen Omar, Jone Emons, Hendrik Esteso, María-José Martínez O’Connor, Gavin An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens |
title | An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens |
title_full | An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens |
title_fullStr | An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens |
title_full_unstemmed | An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens |
title_short | An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens |
title_sort | assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nitridechiara anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT nørgaardjørgen anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT omarjone anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT emonshendrik anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT estesomariajosemartinez anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT oconnorgavin anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT nitridechiara assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT nørgaardjørgen assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT omarjone assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT emonshendrik assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT estesomariajosemartinez assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens AT oconnorgavin assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens |