Cargando…

An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens

The unintentional presence of even trace amounts of certain foods constitutes a major hazard for those who suffer from food allergies. For many food industries, product and raw ingredient surveillance forms part of their risk assessment procedures. This may require the detection of multiple allergen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nitride, Chiara, Nørgaard, Jørgen, Omar, Jone, Emons, Hendrik, Esteso, María-José Martínez, O’Connor, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z
_version_ 1783427349910388736
author Nitride, Chiara
Nørgaard, Jørgen
Omar, Jone
Emons, Hendrik
Esteso, María-José Martínez
O’Connor, Gavin
author_facet Nitride, Chiara
Nørgaard, Jørgen
Omar, Jone
Emons, Hendrik
Esteso, María-José Martínez
O’Connor, Gavin
author_sort Nitride, Chiara
collection PubMed
description The unintentional presence of even trace amounts of certain foods constitutes a major hazard for those who suffer from food allergies. For many food industries, product and raw ingredient surveillance forms part of their risk assessment procedures. This may require the detection of multiple allergens in a wide variety of matrices. Mass spectrometry offers a possible solution for the quantification of multiple allergens in a single analysis. The capability of MS to quantify many peptides from a complex protein digestion is well known. However, a lack of matrix certified reference materials has made the optimisation of extraction and digestion conditions for multiplexed allergen quantification difficult to assess. Here, we report a systematic study, using preliminary screening followed by a Design of Experiments approach, to find the optimal buffer and digestion conditions for detecting milk and egg protein markers in a model processed food matrix. Five of the most commonly used buffers, two chaotropic reagents and two reducing reagents were assessed for the optimal extraction of multiple protein markers. While the choice of background buffer had little impact, the use of chaotropic and reducing reagents showed significant benefits for the extraction of most proteins. A full factorial design experiment was applied to the parameters shown to have a significant impact on protein recovery. These studies suggest that a single optimal set of extraction conditions enabling the quantitative recovery of all proteins is not easily achieved. Therefore, although MS is capable of the simultaneous quantification of many peptides in a single run, greater consideration of protein extraction is required before these are applied for multiplex allergen quantification in food matrices. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65710872019-07-02 An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens Nitride, Chiara Nørgaard, Jørgen Omar, Jone Emons, Hendrik Esteso, María-José Martínez O’Connor, Gavin Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper The unintentional presence of even trace amounts of certain foods constitutes a major hazard for those who suffer from food allergies. For many food industries, product and raw ingredient surveillance forms part of their risk assessment procedures. This may require the detection of multiple allergens in a wide variety of matrices. Mass spectrometry offers a possible solution for the quantification of multiple allergens in a single analysis. The capability of MS to quantify many peptides from a complex protein digestion is well known. However, a lack of matrix certified reference materials has made the optimisation of extraction and digestion conditions for multiplexed allergen quantification difficult to assess. Here, we report a systematic study, using preliminary screening followed by a Design of Experiments approach, to find the optimal buffer and digestion conditions for detecting milk and egg protein markers in a model processed food matrix. Five of the most commonly used buffers, two chaotropic reagents and two reducing reagents were assessed for the optimal extraction of multiple protein markers. While the choice of background buffer had little impact, the use of chaotropic and reducing reagents showed significant benefits for the extraction of most proteins. A full factorial design experiment was applied to the parameters shown to have a significant impact on protein recovery. These studies suggest that a single optimal set of extraction conditions enabling the quantitative recovery of all proteins is not easily achieved. Therefore, although MS is capable of the simultaneous quantification of many peptides in a single run, greater consideration of protein extraction is required before these are applied for multiplex allergen quantification in food matrices. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-28 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6571087/ /pubmed/31139860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Nitride, Chiara
Nørgaard, Jørgen
Omar, Jone
Emons, Hendrik
Esteso, María-José Martínez
O’Connor, Gavin
An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
title An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
title_full An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
title_fullStr An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
title_short An assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
title_sort assessment of the impact of extraction and digestion protocols on multiplexed targeted protein quantification by mass spectrometry for egg and milk allergens
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01816-z
work_keys_str_mv AT nitridechiara anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT nørgaardjørgen anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT omarjone anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT emonshendrik anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT estesomariajosemartinez anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT oconnorgavin anassessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT nitridechiara assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT nørgaardjørgen assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT omarjone assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT emonshendrik assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT estesomariajosemartinez assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens
AT oconnorgavin assessmentoftheimpactofextractionanddigestionprotocolsonmultiplexedtargetedproteinquantificationbymassspectrometryforeggandmilkallergens