Cargando…

Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort

BACKGROUND: Exposures in the periconceptional environment may impact fertility and future health. Assessing time-varying exposures during the periconceptional window requires identifying approximate fertile windows around ovulation. In this prospective cohort study, we instructed women in daily cerv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, Kyley J., Stanford, Joseph B., Blackburn, Brenna E., Porucznik, Christina A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000050
_version_ 1783427361615642624
author Cox, Kyley J.
Stanford, Joseph B.
Blackburn, Brenna E.
Porucznik, Christina A.
author_facet Cox, Kyley J.
Stanford, Joseph B.
Blackburn, Brenna E.
Porucznik, Christina A.
author_sort Cox, Kyley J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exposures in the periconceptional environment may impact fertility and future health. Assessing time-varying exposures during the periconceptional window requires identifying approximate fertile windows around ovulation. In this prospective cohort study, we instructed women in daily cervical fluid observation and interpretation to identify incipient ovulation; they used this information to time daily urine collection for both partners. Timing and completeness of collection were compared to expert review. METHODS: One hundred seventy couples planning pregnancy enrolled from community volunteers from 2011 to 2015; women were taught the Peak Day method to identify fertile windows. Both partners collected daily urine specimens from the first day of fertile-quality fluid (estimator of the beginning of fertile window). Men discontinued on the estimated day of ovulation/conception +2 days; women continued through the onset of next menses, or positive pregnancy test at estimated day of ovulation/conception +18 days. We compared dates from samples with participants’ fertility charts to determine proportion correctly collected. Also, expert reviewers judged on which days urine should have been collected, determining investigator-identified sampling days. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine couples submitted 6,118 urine samples from 284 cycles. Reviewers and participants agreed in 87% of cycles for the date of the beginning of the fertile window ±3 days (65% exact-day agreement); agreement on ovulation date, ±3 days, was 93% (75% exact-day agreement). Five thousand three hundred twenty-nine female samples were expected based on investigator-identified sampling days, and 4,546 were collected, of which 82% were correctly collected on expected days. Fifty-nine percent of male samples were correctly collected relative to investigator-identified sampling days. CONCLUSIONS: Intensively-scheduled, biologically-triggered, at-home biospecimen collection can successfully be targeted to the periconceptional window and completed in a longitudinal cohort study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65711852019-07-22 Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort Cox, Kyley J. Stanford, Joseph B. Blackburn, Brenna E. Porucznik, Christina A. Environ Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Exposures in the periconceptional environment may impact fertility and future health. Assessing time-varying exposures during the periconceptional window requires identifying approximate fertile windows around ovulation. In this prospective cohort study, we instructed women in daily cervical fluid observation and interpretation to identify incipient ovulation; they used this information to time daily urine collection for both partners. Timing and completeness of collection were compared to expert review. METHODS: One hundred seventy couples planning pregnancy enrolled from community volunteers from 2011 to 2015; women were taught the Peak Day method to identify fertile windows. Both partners collected daily urine specimens from the first day of fertile-quality fluid (estimator of the beginning of fertile window). Men discontinued on the estimated day of ovulation/conception +2 days; women continued through the onset of next menses, or positive pregnancy test at estimated day of ovulation/conception +18 days. We compared dates from samples with participants’ fertility charts to determine proportion correctly collected. Also, expert reviewers judged on which days urine should have been collected, determining investigator-identified sampling days. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine couples submitted 6,118 urine samples from 284 cycles. Reviewers and participants agreed in 87% of cycles for the date of the beginning of the fertile window ±3 days (65% exact-day agreement); agreement on ovulation date, ±3 days, was 93% (75% exact-day agreement). Five thousand three hundred twenty-nine female samples were expected based on investigator-identified sampling days, and 4,546 were collected, of which 82% were correctly collected on expected days. Fifty-nine percent of male samples were correctly collected relative to investigator-identified sampling days. CONCLUSIONS: Intensively-scheduled, biologically-triggered, at-home biospecimen collection can successfully be targeted to the periconceptional window and completed in a longitudinal cohort study. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6571185/ /pubmed/31342009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000050 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The Environmental Epidemiology. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cox, Kyley J.
Stanford, Joseph B.
Blackburn, Brenna E.
Porucznik, Christina A.
Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
title Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
title_full Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
title_fullStr Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
title_full_unstemmed Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
title_short Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
title_sort compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000050
work_keys_str_mv AT coxkyleyj compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort
AT stanfordjosephb compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort
AT blackburnbrennae compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort
AT porucznikchristinaa compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort