Cargando…
Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort
BACKGROUND: Exposures in the periconceptional environment may impact fertility and future health. Assessing time-varying exposures during the periconceptional window requires identifying approximate fertile windows around ovulation. In this prospective cohort study, we instructed women in daily cerv...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000050 |
_version_ | 1783427361615642624 |
---|---|
author | Cox, Kyley J. Stanford, Joseph B. Blackburn, Brenna E. Porucznik, Christina A. |
author_facet | Cox, Kyley J. Stanford, Joseph B. Blackburn, Brenna E. Porucznik, Christina A. |
author_sort | Cox, Kyley J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Exposures in the periconceptional environment may impact fertility and future health. Assessing time-varying exposures during the periconceptional window requires identifying approximate fertile windows around ovulation. In this prospective cohort study, we instructed women in daily cervical fluid observation and interpretation to identify incipient ovulation; they used this information to time daily urine collection for both partners. Timing and completeness of collection were compared to expert review. METHODS: One hundred seventy couples planning pregnancy enrolled from community volunteers from 2011 to 2015; women were taught the Peak Day method to identify fertile windows. Both partners collected daily urine specimens from the first day of fertile-quality fluid (estimator of the beginning of fertile window). Men discontinued on the estimated day of ovulation/conception +2 days; women continued through the onset of next menses, or positive pregnancy test at estimated day of ovulation/conception +18 days. We compared dates from samples with participants’ fertility charts to determine proportion correctly collected. Also, expert reviewers judged on which days urine should have been collected, determining investigator-identified sampling days. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine couples submitted 6,118 urine samples from 284 cycles. Reviewers and participants agreed in 87% of cycles for the date of the beginning of the fertile window ±3 days (65% exact-day agreement); agreement on ovulation date, ±3 days, was 93% (75% exact-day agreement). Five thousand three hundred twenty-nine female samples were expected based on investigator-identified sampling days, and 4,546 were collected, of which 82% were correctly collected on expected days. Fifty-nine percent of male samples were correctly collected relative to investigator-identified sampling days. CONCLUSIONS: Intensively-scheduled, biologically-triggered, at-home biospecimen collection can successfully be targeted to the periconceptional window and completed in a longitudinal cohort study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6571185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65711852019-07-22 Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort Cox, Kyley J. Stanford, Joseph B. Blackburn, Brenna E. Porucznik, Christina A. Environ Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Exposures in the periconceptional environment may impact fertility and future health. Assessing time-varying exposures during the periconceptional window requires identifying approximate fertile windows around ovulation. In this prospective cohort study, we instructed women in daily cervical fluid observation and interpretation to identify incipient ovulation; they used this information to time daily urine collection for both partners. Timing and completeness of collection were compared to expert review. METHODS: One hundred seventy couples planning pregnancy enrolled from community volunteers from 2011 to 2015; women were taught the Peak Day method to identify fertile windows. Both partners collected daily urine specimens from the first day of fertile-quality fluid (estimator of the beginning of fertile window). Men discontinued on the estimated day of ovulation/conception +2 days; women continued through the onset of next menses, or positive pregnancy test at estimated day of ovulation/conception +18 days. We compared dates from samples with participants’ fertility charts to determine proportion correctly collected. Also, expert reviewers judged on which days urine should have been collected, determining investigator-identified sampling days. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine couples submitted 6,118 urine samples from 284 cycles. Reviewers and participants agreed in 87% of cycles for the date of the beginning of the fertile window ±3 days (65% exact-day agreement); agreement on ovulation date, ±3 days, was 93% (75% exact-day agreement). Five thousand three hundred twenty-nine female samples were expected based on investigator-identified sampling days, and 4,546 were collected, of which 82% were correctly collected on expected days. Fifty-nine percent of male samples were correctly collected relative to investigator-identified sampling days. CONCLUSIONS: Intensively-scheduled, biologically-triggered, at-home biospecimen collection can successfully be targeted to the periconceptional window and completed in a longitudinal cohort study. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6571185/ /pubmed/31342009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000050 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The Environmental Epidemiology. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cox, Kyley J. Stanford, Joseph B. Blackburn, Brenna E. Porucznik, Christina A. Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort |
title | Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort |
title_full | Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort |
title_fullStr | Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort |
title_short | Compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort |
title_sort | compliance with daily, home-based collection of urinary biospecimens in a prospective, preconception cohort |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coxkyleyj compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort AT stanfordjosephb compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort AT blackburnbrennae compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort AT porucznikchristinaa compliancewithdailyhomebasedcollectionofurinarybiospecimensinaprospectivepreconceptioncohort |