Cargando…

To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation

BACKGROUND: Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a commonly used tool in the plastic surgeon’s reconstructive armamentarium. Fibrin glue (FG) consists of a combination of clotting factors and thrombin whose key properties include adherence and hemostasis. This preliminary study aimed to assess cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullens, Cody L., Messa, Charles A., Kozak, Geoffrey M., Rhemtulla, Irfan A., Fischer, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002187
_version_ 1783427381961162752
author Mullens, Cody L.
Messa, Charles A.
Kozak, Geoffrey M.
Rhemtulla, Irfan A.
Fischer, John P.
author_facet Mullens, Cody L.
Messa, Charles A.
Kozak, Geoffrey M.
Rhemtulla, Irfan A.
Fischer, John P.
author_sort Mullens, Cody L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a commonly used tool in the plastic surgeon’s reconstructive armamentarium. Fibrin glue (FG) consists of a combination of clotting factors and thrombin whose key properties include adherence and hemostasis. This preliminary study aimed to assess clinical outcomes and cost of FG for STSG fixation in a general wound reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in all patients undergoing STSG placement by a single surgeon (JPF) from January 2016 to March 2018. Twenty patients were identified and matched by wound location and wound size. Patients were then divided into 2 groups based on the method of STSG fixation: FG (n = 10) or suture only (SO) (n = 10). RESULTS: In patients with FG fixation, we observed trends of decreased adjusted operative times (34.9 versus 49.4 minutes, P = 0.612), a similar length of stay (2.8 versus 3.5 days, P = 0.306), and liberation from the use of negative pressure wound therapy (0 versus 10 wounds, P < 0.0001). There were no observed differences between the 2 groups in terms of graft-related complications at 180 days (1 complication FG versus 0 complications SO). Time to 100% graft take was also not different (20.2 versus 29.4 days, P = 0.405). Additionally, total direct cost ($16,542 FG versus $24,266 SO; P = 0.545) and total charges ($120,336 FG versus $183,750 SO; P = 0.496) were not statistically different between the FG and SO groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary comparative assessment, FG for STSG fixation has shown no difference in clinical outcomes to SO fixation, trends of decreased operative time, and afforded complete liberation from negative pressure wound therapy dressings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65712902019-07-22 To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation Mullens, Cody L. Messa, Charles A. Kozak, Geoffrey M. Rhemtulla, Irfan A. Fischer, John P. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a commonly used tool in the plastic surgeon’s reconstructive armamentarium. Fibrin glue (FG) consists of a combination of clotting factors and thrombin whose key properties include adherence and hemostasis. This preliminary study aimed to assess clinical outcomes and cost of FG for STSG fixation in a general wound reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in all patients undergoing STSG placement by a single surgeon (JPF) from January 2016 to March 2018. Twenty patients were identified and matched by wound location and wound size. Patients were then divided into 2 groups based on the method of STSG fixation: FG (n = 10) or suture only (SO) (n = 10). RESULTS: In patients with FG fixation, we observed trends of decreased adjusted operative times (34.9 versus 49.4 minutes, P = 0.612), a similar length of stay (2.8 versus 3.5 days, P = 0.306), and liberation from the use of negative pressure wound therapy (0 versus 10 wounds, P < 0.0001). There were no observed differences between the 2 groups in terms of graft-related complications at 180 days (1 complication FG versus 0 complications SO). Time to 100% graft take was also not different (20.2 versus 29.4 days, P = 0.405). Additionally, total direct cost ($16,542 FG versus $24,266 SO; P = 0.545) and total charges ($120,336 FG versus $183,750 SO; P = 0.496) were not statistically different between the FG and SO groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary comparative assessment, FG for STSG fixation has shown no difference in clinical outcomes to SO fixation, trends of decreased operative time, and afforded complete liberation from negative pressure wound therapy dressings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6571290/ /pubmed/31333930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002187 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mullens, Cody L.
Messa, Charles A.
Kozak, Geoffrey M.
Rhemtulla, Irfan A.
Fischer, John P.
To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation
title To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation
title_full To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation
title_fullStr To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation
title_full_unstemmed To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation
title_short To Glue or Not to Glue? Analysis of Fibrin Glue for Split-thickness Skin Graft Fixation
title_sort to glue or not to glue? analysis of fibrin glue for split-thickness skin graft fixation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002187
work_keys_str_mv AT mullenscodyl toglueornottoglueanalysisoffibringlueforsplitthicknessskingraftfixation
AT messacharlesa toglueornottoglueanalysisoffibringlueforsplitthicknessskingraftfixation
AT kozakgeoffreym toglueornottoglueanalysisoffibringlueforsplitthicknessskingraftfixation
AT rhemtullairfana toglueornottoglueanalysisoffibringlueforsplitthicknessskingraftfixation
AT fischerjohnp toglueornottoglueanalysisoffibringlueforsplitthicknessskingraftfixation