Cargando…

Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Many techniques for buttocks augmentation have been developed and published, for a more natural, satisfactory, and safe result for the patient. It has been a challenge to find a technique that presented not only volume gain but also gluteal remodeling. METHODS: A total of 1,681 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chacur, Roberto, Sampaio Menezes, Honório, Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea, Dias Alves, Danuza, Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo, Dias Gomes, Leandro, dos Santos Barreto, Gisele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002193
_version_ 1783427388404662272
author Chacur, Roberto
Sampaio Menezes, Honório
Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea
Dias Alves, Danuza
Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo
Dias Gomes, Leandro
dos Santos Barreto, Gisele
author_facet Chacur, Roberto
Sampaio Menezes, Honório
Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea
Dias Alves, Danuza
Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo
Dias Gomes, Leandro
dos Santos Barreto, Gisele
author_sort Chacur, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many techniques for buttocks augmentation have been developed and published, for a more natural, satisfactory, and safe result for the patient. It has been a challenge to find a technique that presented not only volume gain but also gluteal remodeling. METHODS: A total of 1,681 patients who underwent gluteal augmentation with Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) between 2009 and 2018 were selected for this retrospective cohort study. Data collected included demographics, procedures data, and postoperative outcomes. Side effects were calculated and compared using the Student’s t test. RESULTS: A total of 1,681 patients (1,583 women and 98 men) who underwent 2,770 gluteal fillings had their cases retrospectively analyzed. They were injected with 540,751.00 mL of PMMA injected. The patients’ mean age was 39 years, and the mean volume injected in each section was 237 mL during the first procedure and 147 mL during the second procedure. The authors observed 52 cases presenting side effects, representing a rate of 1.88% of 2,770 procedures carried out. The statistically significant (P = 0.02) presence of side effects was detected in relation to the total filling volume. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that gluteal augmentation with PMMA is one of the best options for this type of procedure. In addition, the findings suggest that the guidelines concerning gluteal augmentation must include PMMA filler as an option because PMMA proved to cause few side effects, as demonstrated by this patient cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65713182019-07-22 Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study Chacur, Roberto Sampaio Menezes, Honório Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea Dias Alves, Danuza Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo Dias Gomes, Leandro dos Santos Barreto, Gisele Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Many techniques for buttocks augmentation have been developed and published, for a more natural, satisfactory, and safe result for the patient. It has been a challenge to find a technique that presented not only volume gain but also gluteal remodeling. METHODS: A total of 1,681 patients who underwent gluteal augmentation with Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) between 2009 and 2018 were selected for this retrospective cohort study. Data collected included demographics, procedures data, and postoperative outcomes. Side effects were calculated and compared using the Student’s t test. RESULTS: A total of 1,681 patients (1,583 women and 98 men) who underwent 2,770 gluteal fillings had their cases retrospectively analyzed. They were injected with 540,751.00 mL of PMMA injected. The patients’ mean age was 39 years, and the mean volume injected in each section was 237 mL during the first procedure and 147 mL during the second procedure. The authors observed 52 cases presenting side effects, representing a rate of 1.88% of 2,770 procedures carried out. The statistically significant (P = 0.02) presence of side effects was detected in relation to the total filling volume. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that gluteal augmentation with PMMA is one of the best options for this type of procedure. In addition, the findings suggest that the guidelines concerning gluteal augmentation must include PMMA filler as an option because PMMA proved to cause few side effects, as demonstrated by this patient cohort. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6571318/ /pubmed/31333932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002193 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chacur, Roberto
Sampaio Menezes, Honório
Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea
Dias Alves, Danuza
Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo
Dias Gomes, Leandro
dos Santos Barreto, Gisele
Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study
title Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study
title_full Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study
title_fullStr Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study
title_short Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study
title_sort gluteal augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate: a 10-year cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002193
work_keys_str_mv AT chacurroberto glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy
AT sampaiomenezeshonorio glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy
AT mariabordindasilvachacurnivea glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy
AT diasalvesdanuza glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy
AT cadoremafaldorodrigo glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy
AT diasgomesleandro glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy
AT dossantosbarretogisele glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy