Cargando…
Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Many techniques for buttocks augmentation have been developed and published, for a more natural, satisfactory, and safe result for the patient. It has been a challenge to find a technique that presented not only volume gain but also gluteal remodeling. METHODS: A total of 1,681 patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002193 |
_version_ | 1783427388404662272 |
---|---|
author | Chacur, Roberto Sampaio Menezes, Honório Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea Dias Alves, Danuza Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo Dias Gomes, Leandro dos Santos Barreto, Gisele |
author_facet | Chacur, Roberto Sampaio Menezes, Honório Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea Dias Alves, Danuza Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo Dias Gomes, Leandro dos Santos Barreto, Gisele |
author_sort | Chacur, Roberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many techniques for buttocks augmentation have been developed and published, for a more natural, satisfactory, and safe result for the patient. It has been a challenge to find a technique that presented not only volume gain but also gluteal remodeling. METHODS: A total of 1,681 patients who underwent gluteal augmentation with Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) between 2009 and 2018 were selected for this retrospective cohort study. Data collected included demographics, procedures data, and postoperative outcomes. Side effects were calculated and compared using the Student’s t test. RESULTS: A total of 1,681 patients (1,583 women and 98 men) who underwent 2,770 gluteal fillings had their cases retrospectively analyzed. They were injected with 540,751.00 mL of PMMA injected. The patients’ mean age was 39 years, and the mean volume injected in each section was 237 mL during the first procedure and 147 mL during the second procedure. The authors observed 52 cases presenting side effects, representing a rate of 1.88% of 2,770 procedures carried out. The statistically significant (P = 0.02) presence of side effects was detected in relation to the total filling volume. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that gluteal augmentation with PMMA is one of the best options for this type of procedure. In addition, the findings suggest that the guidelines concerning gluteal augmentation must include PMMA filler as an option because PMMA proved to cause few side effects, as demonstrated by this patient cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6571318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65713182019-07-22 Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study Chacur, Roberto Sampaio Menezes, Honório Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea Dias Alves, Danuza Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo Dias Gomes, Leandro dos Santos Barreto, Gisele Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Many techniques for buttocks augmentation have been developed and published, for a more natural, satisfactory, and safe result for the patient. It has been a challenge to find a technique that presented not only volume gain but also gluteal remodeling. METHODS: A total of 1,681 patients who underwent gluteal augmentation with Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) between 2009 and 2018 were selected for this retrospective cohort study. Data collected included demographics, procedures data, and postoperative outcomes. Side effects were calculated and compared using the Student’s t test. RESULTS: A total of 1,681 patients (1,583 women and 98 men) who underwent 2,770 gluteal fillings had their cases retrospectively analyzed. They were injected with 540,751.00 mL of PMMA injected. The patients’ mean age was 39 years, and the mean volume injected in each section was 237 mL during the first procedure and 147 mL during the second procedure. The authors observed 52 cases presenting side effects, representing a rate of 1.88% of 2,770 procedures carried out. The statistically significant (P = 0.02) presence of side effects was detected in relation to the total filling volume. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that gluteal augmentation with PMMA is one of the best options for this type of procedure. In addition, the findings suggest that the guidelines concerning gluteal augmentation must include PMMA filler as an option because PMMA proved to cause few side effects, as demonstrated by this patient cohort. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6571318/ /pubmed/31333932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002193 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chacur, Roberto Sampaio Menezes, Honório Maria Bordin da Silva Chacur, Nívea Dias Alves, Danuza Cadore Mafaldo, Rodrigo Dias Gomes, Leandro dos Santos Barreto, Gisele Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study |
title | Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study |
title_full | Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study |
title_short | Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study |
title_sort | gluteal augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate: a 10-year cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chacurroberto glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy AT sampaiomenezeshonorio glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy AT mariabordindasilvachacurnivea glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy AT diasalvesdanuza glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy AT cadoremafaldorodrigo glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy AT diasgomesleandro glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy AT dossantosbarretogisele glutealaugmentationwithpolymethylmethacrylatea10yearcohortstudy |