Cargando…
A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty
The risk for minor local complications for abdominoplasty remains high despite advances in strategies in recent years. The most common complication is the formation of seroma with reported rates ranging from 15% to 40%. The use of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) on closed surgical...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002141 |
_version_ | 1783427392863207424 |
---|---|
author | Abesamis, Gerald M. Chopra, Shiv Vickery, Karen Deva, Anand K. |
author_facet | Abesamis, Gerald M. Chopra, Shiv Vickery, Karen Deva, Anand K. |
author_sort | Abesamis, Gerald M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The risk for minor local complications for abdominoplasty remains high despite advances in strategies in recent years. The most common complication is the formation of seroma with reported rates ranging from 15% to 40%. The use of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) on closed surgical sites has been shown to decrease the infection, dehiscence, and seroma rates. Thus, this article aims to determine whether an iNPWT dressing, Prevena Plus, is able to reduce postoperative drainage and seroma formation in patients who undergo abdominoplasty. Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent abdominoplasty by a single surgeon were dressed with standard dressings and iNPWT dressings. Total drain output, day of drain removal, and adverse events were compared between cohorts with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The iNPWT group demonstrated a significantly less amount of fluid drainage with a mean total fluid output of 370 ± 275 ml compared to 1269 ± 436 ml mean total drainage from controls (P < 0.001). Time before removal of both drains was almost halved in the iNPWT group with an average of 5.3 ± 1.6 days, which was significantly less than the average time of 10.6 ± 2.9 days seen in control patients (P < 0.001). No observed adverse events were recorded in either group. Our findings show that iNPWT for a closed abdominoplasty incision decreases the rate of postoperative fluid accumulation and results in earlier drain removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6571337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65713372019-07-22 A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty Abesamis, Gerald M. Chopra, Shiv Vickery, Karen Deva, Anand K. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ideas and Innovations The risk for minor local complications for abdominoplasty remains high despite advances in strategies in recent years. The most common complication is the formation of seroma with reported rates ranging from 15% to 40%. The use of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) on closed surgical sites has been shown to decrease the infection, dehiscence, and seroma rates. Thus, this article aims to determine whether an iNPWT dressing, Prevena Plus, is able to reduce postoperative drainage and seroma formation in patients who undergo abdominoplasty. Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent abdominoplasty by a single surgeon were dressed with standard dressings and iNPWT dressings. Total drain output, day of drain removal, and adverse events were compared between cohorts with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The iNPWT group demonstrated a significantly less amount of fluid drainage with a mean total fluid output of 370 ± 275 ml compared to 1269 ± 436 ml mean total drainage from controls (P < 0.001). Time before removal of both drains was almost halved in the iNPWT group with an average of 5.3 ± 1.6 days, which was significantly less than the average time of 10.6 ± 2.9 days seen in control patients (P < 0.001). No observed adverse events were recorded in either group. Our findings show that iNPWT for a closed abdominoplasty incision decreases the rate of postoperative fluid accumulation and results in earlier drain removal. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6571337/ /pubmed/31333924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002141 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Ideas and Innovations Abesamis, Gerald M. Chopra, Shiv Vickery, Karen Deva, Anand K. A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty |
title | A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty |
title_full | A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty |
title_short | A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty |
title_sort | comparative trial of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy in abdominoplasty |
topic | Ideas and Innovations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abesamisgeraldm acomparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty AT choprashiv acomparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty AT vickerykaren acomparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty AT devaanandk acomparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty AT abesamisgeraldm comparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty AT choprashiv comparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty AT vickerykaren comparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty AT devaanandk comparativetrialofincisionalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinabdominoplasty |