Cargando…

Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method

BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magnusson, Mark R., Connell, Tony, Miroshnik, Michael, Layt, Craig, Ashton, Mark, Deva, Anand K., Farrow, Hamish, Januszkiewicz, Janek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002237
_version_ 1783427394979233792
author Magnusson, Mark R.
Connell, Tony
Miroshnik, Michael
Layt, Craig
Ashton, Mark
Deva, Anand K.
Farrow, Hamish
Januszkiewicz, Janek
author_facet Magnusson, Mark R.
Connell, Tony
Miroshnik, Michael
Layt, Craig
Ashton, Mark
Deva, Anand K.
Farrow, Hamish
Januszkiewicz, Janek
author_sort Magnusson, Mark R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast implant selection in Australia and New Zealand based on practice patterns in those countries. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus from experts in breast augmentation surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Panelists anonymously completed an initial questionnaire on current considerations in implant selection, discussed a summary of their responses in a live meeting, and completed a final consensus survey based on their live recommendations. RESULTS: Seven panelists completed the final consensus survey. Consensus recommendations included ensuring consideration of proper surgical technique (pocket formation, positioning of implant) and patient tissue and anatomical characteristics, weighing relative expected results of various surface textures, sizes, and degrees of cohesivity, and careful contemplation of the migration risk. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi exercise provided consensus recommendations on the key factors involved in implant selection from the perspective of plastic surgeons with practices in Australia and New Zealand. A primary recommendation was that the choice of implant for each patient should be individualized to patient tissue and anatomical characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65713462019-07-22 Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method Magnusson, Mark R. Connell, Tony Miroshnik, Michael Layt, Craig Ashton, Mark Deva, Anand K. Farrow, Hamish Januszkiewicz, Janek Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast implant selection in Australia and New Zealand based on practice patterns in those countries. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus from experts in breast augmentation surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Panelists anonymously completed an initial questionnaire on current considerations in implant selection, discussed a summary of their responses in a live meeting, and completed a final consensus survey based on their live recommendations. RESULTS: Seven panelists completed the final consensus survey. Consensus recommendations included ensuring consideration of proper surgical technique (pocket formation, positioning of implant) and patient tissue and anatomical characteristics, weighing relative expected results of various surface textures, sizes, and degrees of cohesivity, and careful contemplation of the migration risk. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi exercise provided consensus recommendations on the key factors involved in implant selection from the perspective of plastic surgeons with practices in Australia and New Zealand. A primary recommendation was that the choice of implant for each patient should be individualized to patient tissue and anatomical characteristics. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6571346/ /pubmed/31333962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002237 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Magnusson, Mark R.
Connell, Tony
Miroshnik, Michael
Layt, Craig
Ashton, Mark
Deva, Anand K.
Farrow, Hamish
Januszkiewicz, Janek
Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method
title Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method
title_full Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method
title_fullStr Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method
title_full_unstemmed Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method
title_short Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method
title_sort breast implant selection: consensus recommendations using a modified delphi method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002237
work_keys_str_mv AT magnussonmarkr breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT connelltony breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT miroshnikmichael breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT laytcraig breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT ashtonmark breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT devaanandk breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT farrowhamish breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT januszkiewiczjanek breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod