Cargando…
Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method
BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002237 |
_version_ | 1783427394979233792 |
---|---|
author | Magnusson, Mark R. Connell, Tony Miroshnik, Michael Layt, Craig Ashton, Mark Deva, Anand K. Farrow, Hamish Januszkiewicz, Janek |
author_facet | Magnusson, Mark R. Connell, Tony Miroshnik, Michael Layt, Craig Ashton, Mark Deva, Anand K. Farrow, Hamish Januszkiewicz, Janek |
author_sort | Magnusson, Mark R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast implant selection in Australia and New Zealand based on practice patterns in those countries. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus from experts in breast augmentation surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Panelists anonymously completed an initial questionnaire on current considerations in implant selection, discussed a summary of their responses in a live meeting, and completed a final consensus survey based on their live recommendations. RESULTS: Seven panelists completed the final consensus survey. Consensus recommendations included ensuring consideration of proper surgical technique (pocket formation, positioning of implant) and patient tissue and anatomical characteristics, weighing relative expected results of various surface textures, sizes, and degrees of cohesivity, and careful contemplation of the migration risk. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi exercise provided consensus recommendations on the key factors involved in implant selection from the perspective of plastic surgeons with practices in Australia and New Zealand. A primary recommendation was that the choice of implant for each patient should be individualized to patient tissue and anatomical characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6571346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65713462019-07-22 Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method Magnusson, Mark R. Connell, Tony Miroshnik, Michael Layt, Craig Ashton, Mark Deva, Anand K. Farrow, Hamish Januszkiewicz, Janek Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Geographical differences in breast implant selection approaches exist, and clinical data to guide the process are limited. Developing knowledge of implant-related risk factors further complicates the process. This analysis aimed to establish expert consensus on considerations for breast implant selection in Australia and New Zealand based on practice patterns in those countries. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus from experts in breast augmentation surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Panelists anonymously completed an initial questionnaire on current considerations in implant selection, discussed a summary of their responses in a live meeting, and completed a final consensus survey based on their live recommendations. RESULTS: Seven panelists completed the final consensus survey. Consensus recommendations included ensuring consideration of proper surgical technique (pocket formation, positioning of implant) and patient tissue and anatomical characteristics, weighing relative expected results of various surface textures, sizes, and degrees of cohesivity, and careful contemplation of the migration risk. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi exercise provided consensus recommendations on the key factors involved in implant selection from the perspective of plastic surgeons with practices in Australia and New Zealand. A primary recommendation was that the choice of implant for each patient should be individualized to patient tissue and anatomical characteristics. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6571346/ /pubmed/31333962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002237 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Magnusson, Mark R. Connell, Tony Miroshnik, Michael Layt, Craig Ashton, Mark Deva, Anand K. Farrow, Hamish Januszkiewicz, Janek Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method |
title | Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method |
title_full | Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method |
title_fullStr | Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method |
title_short | Breast Implant Selection: Consensus Recommendations Using a Modified Delphi Method |
title_sort | breast implant selection: consensus recommendations using a modified delphi method |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magnussonmarkr breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT connelltony breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT miroshnikmichael breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT laytcraig breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT ashtonmark breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT devaanandk breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT farrowhamish breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod AT januszkiewiczjanek breastimplantselectionconsensusrecommendationsusingamodifieddelphimethod |