Cargando…
The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute stroke: A prospective randomized control trial
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain if dexmedetomidine has more favorable pharmacokinetic profile than the traditional sedative drug propofol in patients who undergo endovascular therapy for acute stroke. We conducted a prospective randomized control trial to compare the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidi...
Autores principales: | Wu, Bin, Hu, Hongping, Cai, Ailan, Ren, Chunguang, Liu, Shengjie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31124948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015709 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The efficacy of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine-propofol in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: A retrospective trial
por: Zhang, Hongquan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Evaluation of efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
por: Kamal, Kirti, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Transnasal Transsphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Resection
por: Abdallah, Maha Younis Youssef, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of cerebral hemodynamic variables in hemorrhagic stroke using dexmedetomidine–propofol versus dexmedetomidine–midazolam
por: Perez-Rada, FJ, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil during fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
por: Wu, Bin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)