Cargando…

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon as a novel therapeutic strategy has been used to treat restenosis in cases of bare metal and drug-eluting stents. However, evidence of its safety and efficacy is scarce in de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Min, Guo, Chen, Lv, Yong-Hui, Zhang, Ming-Bo, Wang, Zhi-Lu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31124941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015622
_version_ 1783427407283224576
author Li, Min
Guo, Chen
Lv, Yong-Hui
Zhang, Ming-Bo
Wang, Zhi-Lu
author_facet Li, Min
Guo, Chen
Lv, Yong-Hui
Zhang, Ming-Bo
Wang, Zhi-Lu
author_sort Li, Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon as a novel therapeutic strategy has been used to treat restenosis in cases of bare metal and drug-eluting stents. However, evidence of its safety and efficacy is scarce in de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies published up to October 17, 2018. Studies comparing the drug-coated balloon with the drug-eluting stent strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease (reference diameter, <3 mm) were identified. The clinical outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac death, all-cause death, target lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were analyzed using the statistical software RevMan (version 5.3). Fixed effects models were performed to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Sensitivity analyses were used to detect potential sources of heterogeneity, while subgroup analyses were implemented to assess the differential effects. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials and 3 nonrandomized controlled studies were identified. Six studies including a total of 1800 patients compared the differences between the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent strategies in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. The results indicated that the drug-coated balloon strategy was associated with a significant reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.90, P = .02) compared with the drug-eluting stent strategy, while insignificant inter-strategy differences were observed in cardiac death (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.73–3.33, P = .25), all-cause death (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25–1.23, P = .15), target lesion revascularization (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.73–2.1, P = .43), and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59–1.52, P = .84). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that the drug-coated balloon strategy is noninferior to the drug-eluting stent strategy, delivering a good outcome in nonfatal myocardial infarction, and can be recommended as an optimal treatment strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. Larger randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to further confirm the benefits of the drug-coated balloon strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65713992019-07-22 Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Min Guo, Chen Lv, Yong-Hui Zhang, Ming-Bo Wang, Zhi-Lu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon as a novel therapeutic strategy has been used to treat restenosis in cases of bare metal and drug-eluting stents. However, evidence of its safety and efficacy is scarce in de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies published up to October 17, 2018. Studies comparing the drug-coated balloon with the drug-eluting stent strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease (reference diameter, <3 mm) were identified. The clinical outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac death, all-cause death, target lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were analyzed using the statistical software RevMan (version 5.3). Fixed effects models were performed to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Sensitivity analyses were used to detect potential sources of heterogeneity, while subgroup analyses were implemented to assess the differential effects. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials and 3 nonrandomized controlled studies were identified. Six studies including a total of 1800 patients compared the differences between the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent strategies in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. The results indicated that the drug-coated balloon strategy was associated with a significant reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.90, P = .02) compared with the drug-eluting stent strategy, while insignificant inter-strategy differences were observed in cardiac death (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.73–3.33, P = .25), all-cause death (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25–1.23, P = .15), target lesion revascularization (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.73–2.1, P = .43), and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59–1.52, P = .84). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that the drug-coated balloon strategy is noninferior to the drug-eluting stent strategy, delivering a good outcome in nonfatal myocardial infarction, and can be recommended as an optimal treatment strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. Larger randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to further confirm the benefits of the drug-coated balloon strategy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6571399/ /pubmed/31124941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015622 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Min
Guo, Chen
Lv, Yong-Hui
Zhang, Ming-Bo
Wang, Zhi-Lu
Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31124941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015622
work_keys_str_mv AT limin drugcoatedballoonversusdrugelutingstentindenovosmallcoronaryvesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guochen drugcoatedballoonversusdrugelutingstentindenovosmallcoronaryvesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lvyonghui drugcoatedballoonversusdrugelutingstentindenovosmallcoronaryvesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangmingbo drugcoatedballoonversusdrugelutingstentindenovosmallcoronaryvesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzhilu drugcoatedballoonversusdrugelutingstentindenovosmallcoronaryvesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis